title: Pars 6, Cap. 8

title_alt:
De integritate confirmationis
On the integrity of confirmation

source_text:
<!-- page 272 -->

### Capitulum VIII. *De integritate confirmationis.*

De Sacramento *confirmationis* hoc tenendum est, quod ad ipsius integritatem requiritur forma vocalis, quae secundum morem magis communem haec est: Signo te signo crucis, confirmo te chrismate salutis, in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti. Amen. — Requiritur etiam *chrisma*, quod conficitur ex oleo olivarum et balsamo, de quo cum per manus episcopi signum crucis fronti imprimitur sub praedicta forma verborum confirmationis, suscipitur Sacramentum; per quod confirmatur homo ut *pugil* ad nomen Christi audacter et publice confitendum[^p272-8].

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia reparativum principium nostrum, Verbum scilicet incarnatum, sicut aeternaliter conceptum est in corde Patris et temporaliter in carne sensibiliter apparuit homini, sic neminem reparat, nisi ipsum et corde credendo concipiat et creditum exterius con-
<!-- page 273 -->
fitendo depromat confessione debita; huiusmodi est confessio veridica veritate plena, quae non tantum est veritas speculativa, verum etiam practica. Haec autem est, in qua non tantum est « adaequatio intellectus, sermonis et rei[^p273-1] », verum etiam, in qua totus homo veritati conformatur secundum intelligentiam *rationis*, secundum complacentiam *voluntatis* et secundum adhaerentiam *virtutis*, ut sit *ex toto corde, tota anima et tota mente*[^p273-2], sit *ex corde puro, conscientia bona et fide non ficta*; et talis est confessio *integra, placida* et *intrepida*; ut sit *integra* ratione eius, de quo est; *placida* ratione eius, coram quo fit; *intrepida* ratione eius, a quo fieri habet illa confessio. Quoniam ergo ad hoc homo pusillanimis non est idoneus, nisi per manum supernae gratiae confirmetur; ideo ad hoc Sacramentum confirmationis fuit divinitus institutum tanquam immediate sequens baptismum.

Quia vero « finis imponit necessitatem his quae sunt ad finem[^p273-3] »; ideo integrari debet hoc Sacramentum secundum exigentiam confessionis praedictae et suarum conditionum, trium videlicet praedictarum. Primo ergo, quoniam confessio haec debet esse *integra*; et integritas confessionis non est, nisi quis confiteatur Christum verum hominem pro hominibus crucifixum, eundemque verum Dei Filium incarnatum, in Trinitate Patri et Spiritui sancto per omnia coaequalem: hinc est, quod in forma vocali non tantum fit expressio actus confirmandi, verum etiam ipsius signi crucis et nominis beatissimae Trinitatis.

Amplius, quoniam confessio debet esse *placida* ratione eius, coram quo fit, et fieri habet coram Deo et hominibus[^p273-4]; et Deo non potest placere, nisi adsit *lumen intelligentiae* et *nitor conscientiae*, nec proximo, nisi adsit *odor bonae famae* et *vitae honestae*: ideo ad horum designationem in elemento exteriori commiscetur *oleum* olivarum, quod est nitidum, et *balsamum*, quod est odoriferum; ut per hoc significetur, quod confessio, ad quam hoc Sacramentum ordinat et disponit, coniunctum debet habere *nitorem* conscientiae et intelligentiae cum suavi *odore* tam vitae quam famae, ne contrarietas aliqua sit inter linguam et conscientiam, vel inter linguam et famam, propter quam talis confessio non acceptetur ab homine nec approbetur a Christo.

Postremo, quoniam talis confessio debet esse *intrepida*, ut nec pudore nec timore dimittat quis dicere veritatem, nec[^p273-5] tempore persecutionis ignominiosam mortem Christi in cruce confiteri publice formidet quis vel erubescat, praecipue horrens incidere in consimilem poenam et ignominiam passionis; et huiusmodi timor et pudor potissime apparet in facie et maxime in fronte: ideo ad omnem verecundiam et formidinem propulsandam et *manus potestativa* imponitur, quae confirmet, et *crux* fronti imprimitur, ut non erubescat eam publice confiteri nec formidet pro confessione nominis Christi, si opus fuerit, quantamcumque poenam vel ignominiam sustinere, tanquam verus pugil unctus ad proelium et tanquam miles strenuus, ferens in fronte regis sui signum et crucis eius triumphale vexillum, cum quo paratus sit penetrare hostium cuneos securus. Non enim potest crucis gloria libere praedicari, si crucis poena et ignominia formidetur, iuxta quod sanctus dicebat Andreas: « Ego, si crucis ignominiam expavescerem, crucis gloriam non praedicarem[^p273-6] ».

---

english:
### Chapter VIII. *On the integrity of confirmation.*

Concerning the Sacrament of *confirmation* this must be held: that for its integrity there is required a vocal form, which according to the more common usage is this: I sign thee with the sign of the cross, I confirm thee with the chrism of salvation, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen. — There is required also *chrism*, which is compounded of the oil of olives and of balsam, with which, when through the hands of the bishop the sign of the cross is imprinted upon the forehead under the aforesaid form of the words of confirmation, the Sacrament is received; through which a man is confirmed as a *champion* for confessing the name of Christ boldly and publicly[^p272-8].

Now the reason for the understanding of the aforesaid is this: since our reparative principle, the Word namely incarnate, just as it was eternally conceived in the heart of the Father and temporally appeared to man sensibly in the flesh, so repairs no one unless he both conceive it by believing with the heart and bring forth what he has believed outwardly by con-
<!-- page 273 -->
fessing it with the confession that is due; and of this kind is a truthful confession full of truth, which is not only speculative truth but also practical. And this is that in which there is not only « the adequation of intellect, of speech and of the thing[^p273-1] », but also that in which the whole man is conformed to truth according to the understanding of *reason*, according to the complacency of the *will* and according to the adherence of *virtue*, so that it be *from the whole heart, the whole soul and the whole mind*[^p273-2], be *from a pure heart, a good conscience and faith unfeigned*; and such a confession is *entire, pleasing* and *intrepid*; so that it be *entire* by reason of that of which it is; *pleasing* by reason of him before whom it is made; *intrepid* by reason of him by whom that confession has to be made. Since therefore for this the pusillanimous man is not fit, unless he be confirmed through the hand of supernal grace; therefore for this the Sacrament of confirmation was divinely instituted as immediately following baptism.

But because « the end imposes necessity upon those things which are unto the end[^p273-3] »; therefore this Sacrament ought to be made entire according to the exigency of the aforesaid confession and of its conditions, namely of the three aforesaid. First then, since this confession ought to be *entire*; and there is no integrity of confession unless one confess Christ as true man crucified for men, and the same as true Son of God incarnate, in the Trinity coequal in all things with the Father and with the Holy Spirit: hence it is that in the vocal form there is made not only the expression of the act of confirming, but also of the sign of the cross itself and of the name of the most blessed Trinity.

Further, since the confession ought to be *pleasing* by reason of him before whom it is made, and it has to be made before God and men[^p273-4]; and it cannot please God unless there be present *the light of understanding* and *the brightness of conscience*, nor the neighbour unless there be present *the odor of good repute* and *of an honorable life*: therefore for the designation of these there is mingled in the outward element the *oil* of olives, which is bright, and *balsam*, which is fragrant; that by this it may be signified that the confession, to which this Sacrament orders and disposes, ought to have joined to it the *brightness* of conscience and of understanding together with the sweet *odor* as much of life as of repute, lest there be any contrariety between the tongue and the conscience, or between the tongue and repute, on account of which such a confession would not be accepted by man nor approved by Christ.

Lastly, since such a confession ought to be *intrepid*, so that neither by shame nor by fear may anyone forbear to speak the truth, nor[^p273-5] in the time of persecution may anyone dread or blush to confess publicly the ignominious death of Christ upon the cross, chiefly shuddering to fall into a like penalty and ignominy of the passion; and fear and shame of this kind appear most of all in the face and most especially on the forehead: therefore for the driving away of all bashfulness and dread *a potestative hand* also is imposed, which may confirm, and *the cross* is imprinted upon the forehead, that he may not blush to confess it publicly nor dread, for the confession of the name of Christ, to sustain, if there be need, however great a penalty or ignominy, as a true champion anointed for the battle and as a strenuous soldier, bearing on his forehead the sign of his king and the triumphal standard of his cross, with which he may be ready to penetrate the wedges of the enemy in security. For the glory of the cross cannot freely be preached if the penalty and ignominy of the cross be dreaded, according to what Saint Andrew said: « I, if I dreaded the ignominy of the cross, would not preach the glory of the cross[^p273-6] ».

---

la: Vide IV. Sent. d. 7. per totam. — Aliquanto superius pro *requiritur* E *exigitur*, et pro *communem* A G K Q *communis*. — Forma illa indicata habetur in Pontificali Romano. Post *crucis* aliqui codd. addunt *et*.

en: See IV Sent. d. 7 throughout. — Somewhat above, for *requiritur*, E reads *exigitur*, and for *communem*, A, G, K, Q read *communis*. — That form which is here set down is found in the Roman Pontifical. After *crucis* some codices add *et*.

en: On this definition of truth cf. tom. I, p. 707, note 5.

la: Marc. 12, 30. — Seq. locus est I. Tim. 1, 5. — Pro *ut sit* 1, 2 cum pluribus codd. *ut sic*. Immediate post pro *sit* plures codd. et 2 *sic*.

en: Mark 12:30. — The following passage is I Timothy 1:5. — For *ut sit*, editions 1 and 2 with several codices read *ut sic*. Immediately after, for *sit*, several codices and edition 2 read *sic*.

la: Secundum Aristot., II. Phys. text. 88. seqq. (c. 9.). — Inferius plures codd., inter quos E L M, omittunt *in Trinitate*.

en: According to Aristotle, *Physics* II, text 88 ff. (c. 9). — Below, several codices, among them E, L, M, omit *in Trinitate*.

la: Cfr. Matth. 10, 32. — De significatione olei et balsami cfr. verba Hug. a S. Vict. et Innocent. III. allegata tom. IV. pag. 167, nota 1. et pag. 593, nota 2. seq.

en: Cf. Matthew 10:32. — On the signification of oil and of balsam cf. the words of Hugh of St. Victor and of Innocent III adduced in tom. IV, p. 167, note 1, and p. 593, note 2 f.

la: Ita I K L M, sed edd. cum aliis codd. *et*, qui paulo inferius post *publice* prosequuntur *formidat et erubescit* (C O *formidet et erubescat*). Subinde pro *propulsandam* I M O V *propellendam*, L *repellendam*, et pro *potestativa* P *episcopi*, W *pontificum*.

en: So I, K, L, M; but the editions with the other codices read *et*, and these, a little below, after *publice* continue *formidat et erubescit* (C, O *formidet et erubescat*). Thereafter, for *propulsandam*, I, M, O, V read *propellendam*, L *repellendam*, and for *potestativa*, P reads *episcopi*, W *pontificum*.

la: *Passio S. Andreae*, apud Surium, Histor. seu vit. Sanctor., tom. XI. pag. 745, § 4; et apud Galland. Biblioth. (tom. I. pag. 155, c. 4.). Edd. cum paucis codd.: *Ego, si crucem expavescerem... minime praedicarem.* D H cum Surio *crucis patibulum*. — Superius respicitur 3. ant. I. Noct. festi S. Martini (11. Nov.): Hostium cuneos penetrabo securus (ex libro, cui titulus *Liber responsalis*, inter opera S. Gregorii).

en: The *Passion of St. Andrew*, in Surius, *Histories or Lives of the Saints*, tom. XI, p. 745, § 4; and in Galland, *Bibliotheca* (tom. I, p. 155, c. 4). The editions with a few codices read: *Ego, si crucem expavescerem... minime praedicarem* [I, if I dreaded the cross... I would by no means preach]. D, H with Surius read *crucis patibulum*. — Above, reference is had to the third antiphon of the first Nocturn of the feast of St. Martin (11 November): "I shall penetrate the wedges of the enemy in security" (from the book entitled *Liber responsalis*, among the works of St. Gregory). ---

translators_notes:
**★★ PAGE SPAN — pp. 272–273, AND BOTH ENDS ARE FIXED POSITIVELY FROM HEADINGS.** `CAP. VIII.` with the **ONE-line** subtitle `De integritate confirmationis.` stands centred in p. 272's RIGHT column about **40 %** down the leaf, two lines below Cap. VII's closing `…quominus habeat finem suum.` — where `bon-brev-p6-c7` said it stood, and re-set here line by line off the band rather than adopted. **The title is taken from THIS heading, never from the volume index**, whose Pars VI titles are OCR-garbled throughout the block (the index prints `De integritatc confirmationls`). Cap. VIII fills the rest of p. 272's right column; crosses the leaf **MID-WORD, on a hyphen** (p. 272's right column ends `…et creditum exterius con-` and p. 273's left column opens `fitendo depromat confessione debita`); fills p. 273's left column entire to `…nec approbetur a Christo.`; crosses p. 273's gutter **AT A PARAGRAPH BOUNDARY** — the only clean break of the three; and closes about **45 %** down p. 273's RIGHT column at `…crucis gloriam non praedicarem ⁶ ».`

**★★ THE CLOSE IS ESTABLISHED FROM THE `CAP. IX.` HEADING AND FROM NOTHING ELSE.** `CAP. IX.` with the ONE-line subtitle `De integritate eucharistiae.` stands centred in p. 273's RIGHT column, with Cap. IX's opening beneath it in the same column (`De Sacramento *eucharistiae* hoc tenendum est…` beside a fresh `Thesis 1.` gloss). **The volume index's "Cap. IX on p. 273" was a hypothesis on arrival and p. 273's running head `PARS VI. C. IX. 273` was used for nothing** — it names Cap. IX while the whole left column and the top 45 % of the right are Cap. VIII, the same asymmetry the five preceding leaves showed. **The running head has now been an unreliable witness on six consecutive leaves and it is still not evidence.** No inference was drawn from white space at any column foot — and p. 273's left column foot carries a large blank, exactly the shape that wrote `bon-brev-p2-c4` short — and the fact that Cap. VIII's tail (`…crucis gloriam non praedicarem ».`) is a grammatically complete sentence closing a quotation was not treated as evidence of anything; the `CAP. IX.` heading below it is.

**Gutters — one re-derived from the hand-off, one settled fresh with no constant.**
- **p. 272 = 1326, RE-DERIVED rather than re-used.** The hand-off forwarded 1326 as "safe to reuse," and it was measured again from the beginning anyway. `colcrop.py vol5 272` with no constant returns **1326 on a 62 px run**, and **seven of the thirteen windows profiled blow out** (20–40 % → 1401/**223 px** · 25–45 % → 1401/**222 px** · 30–50 % → 1340/**95 px** · 35–55 % → 1333/**246 px** · 40–60 % → 1347/**106 px** · 60–80 % → 1256/**336 px** · 65–85 % → 1224/**271 px** · 70–89 % → 1224/**272 px**). The **five** survivors agree to 4 px: 15–35 % → 1322/65 · 45–65 % → 1326/63 · 50–70 % → 1326/64 · 55–75 % → 1326/64 · 45–92 % → 1326/62. Step 3 reproduces the predecessor exactly: over rows 35–85 % the near-zero band is **x = 1296–1357 (62 px)** and Quaracchi's printed column rule stands inside it at **x = 1323–1328, peaking 220 rows on x = 1327**; band midpoint 1326.5, rule centre 1326. **This reproduces `p6-c7`'s measurement window for window and digit for digit; 1326 confirmed and adopted.**
- **★★ p. 273 = 1164, SETTLED FRESH WITH NO CONSTANT — AND THE DEFAULT WAS REJECTED.** p. 273 had not been imaged; extracted at 450 dpi and profiled with no constant, `colcrop.py vol5 273` returns **1161 on a 54 px run** — **below the 60 px trust floor, and therefore not adopted**, the quiet failure the tool does not flag. Two windows blow out (20–40 % → 1283/**283 px** · 25–45 % → 1241/**201 px**); the **ten** survivors run 15–35 % → 1172/62 · 30–50 % → 1170/63 · 35–55 % → 1169/61 · 40–60 % → 1167/60 · 45–65 % → 1164/59 · 50–70 % → 1164/59 · 55–75 % → 1163/60 · 60–80 % → 1161/59 · 65–85 % → 1159/59 · 70–89 % → 1158/61 — **a 14 px spread on runs of 59–63 px, drifting MONOTONICALLY down the leaf, which is page skew and not disagreement**. Step 3 settles it: the blank band runs **x ≈ 1138–1189** and Quaracchi's printed column rule stands inside it as a **skewed** ink island — x ≈ 1164–1171 in the upper body rows, x ≈ 1156–1161 in the lower, peaking **382 rows** — so the island itself tilts with the leaf. **Band midpoint 1163.5, rule centre ≈ 1164, window consensus 1164 — 1164 adopted**, and the bands cut there read clean edge to edge in both columns. ★ **The rule inked HEAVILY on this leaf (382 rows against p. 272's 220), which is precisely why the default run came back pinched** — the third consecutive leaf on which the default's quality is a reading of the rule's inking and not of the gutter.

**Apparatus source.** Vol V's IA OCR renders footnote numerals as punctuation glyphs — anchor POSITIONS survive in the raw, numbers and footer-entry openers do NOT. **All seven notes here were read off the 450 dpi footer bands** (9 bands at 3.2×, then 14 bands at 4.6× for the digit and siglum work); the counts are band-derived. `audit-apparatus-count` is blind to Vol V; `tools/check-vol5-apparatus.py` is the instrument. **p. 272's total of 8 was established by `bon-brev-p6-c7` and is already in `KNOWN_TOTALS`; p. 273's total of 7 is established here and entered**, with n. 7 forwarded as a legitimate PENDING.

**★★ THE INCOMING HAND-OFF WAS RE-DERIVED IN FULL AND HELD IN EVERY PARTICULAR — AND ITS ONE OPEN DISAGREEMENT IS NOW SETTLED AGAINST THE RAW.** `bon-brev-p6-c7` forwarded p. 272 from n. 8 onward and stated its verification level precisely: **the BLOCK position, the VERBATIM TEXT, the ANCHOR COLUMN (RIGHT) and the anchor WORD of n. 8 all read off the bands**, with every digit and siglum flagged unverified. Every clause of that is correct, and its narrative summary agrees with its per-note list; **nothing had to be withdrawn.** Verification level of every note as established **here**:
- **p. 272 n. 8** — POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified here against the hand-off. Anchors on `audacter et publice confitendum ⁸.` in the **RIGHT** column, closing Cap. VIII's *Thesis 3*. Footer entry **last** in p. 272's right block, complete, with blank paper beneath it — which is what closes the p. 272 → p. 273 test from this side.
- **p. 273 n. 1** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `sermonis et rei ¹ »` in the **LEFT** column, inside the *Ratio* period. Footer entry opens p. 273's left block, NUMBERED.
- **p. 273 n. 2** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `tota anima et tota mente ², sit ex corde puro` in the **LEFT** column, in the *Triplex conformatio* clause. Footer entry second in the left block.
- **p. 273 n. 3** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `sunt ad finem ³ »; ideo integrari debet` in the **LEFT** column, opening the *Pro thesi 1* period. Footer entry third in the left block.
- **p. 273 n. 4** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `coram Deo et hominibus ⁴; et Deo non potest placere` in the **LEFT** column, inside *Pro thesi 2*. Footer entry fourth in the left block.
- **p. 273 n. 5** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `dicere veritatem, nec ⁵ tempore persecutionis` in the **RIGHT** column, in the *Postremo* period. Footer entry last in the left block and **breaks off mid-clause** at `Subinde pro *propulsandam* I M O V`, continuing unnumbered at the head of the right block with `*propellendam*, L *repellendam*…`. ★ **Its ENTRY is in the left block while its ANCHOR is in the right column — a note whose block and column disagree, on this leaf the only one.**
- **p. 273 n. 6** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: anchors on `crucis gloriam non praedicarem ⁶ ».` in the **RIGHT** column, closing Cap. VIII. Footer entry second in the right block, complete.

**★ p. 272's SPLIT MAP — the leaf is now fully consumed.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 — n. 5 straddling the gutter. Right footer block: n. 5's unnumbered continuation, then nn. 6, 7, 8. **Anchors:** nn. 1–5 in the LEFT column, nn. 6–8 in the RIGHT. **Total 8.** nn. 1–7 are Cap. VII's (`p6-c7`'s), n. 8 is mine. **The block split is 5/3 and the anchor split is 5/3 and they coincide, while the capitulum break falls two notes lower, inside the right block between nn. 7 and 8** — as `p6-c7` established; re-read here from the far side and confirmed.

**★★ p. 273's SPLIT MAP — THE BLOCK SPLIT IS 5/3 AND THE ANCHOR SPLIT IS 4/3, AND THEY DO NOT COINCIDE.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 — n. 5 **straddling** the gutter. Right footer block: n. 5's unnumbered continuation, then nn. 6, 7. **Anchors:** nn. 1–4 in the left column, nn. 5–7 in the right. **p. 273's TOTAL IS 7, established here and entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`**; nn. 1–6 are Cap. VIII's (mine), n. 7 is Cap. IX's and is forwarded. ★ **So the block break falls one note BELOW the column break, and the capitulum break one note below that, between nn. 6 and 7 inside the right block: three different places, and the fifth distinct block-vs-anchor-vs-capitulum arrangement in Pars VI.** p. 272's coincident 5/3 did **not** propagate one leaf. **Read anchors, only anchors.**

**★ SIGLA — SEVEN RUNS ACROSS THE TWO LEAVES, AND `H` IS ADMITTED ONCE MORE, ON STROKE COUNT AND ALPHABETICAL ASCENT TOGETHER.**
1. **`E` and `A G K Q` (p. 272 n. 8)** — **the live disagreement forwarded by `p6-c7` is settled here for the plate.** At 4.6× the sort before *exigitur* carries **three horizontal bars on a single upright** and is `E` beyond question; `L` has only the foot bar. **The raw's `L exigitur` is a raw defect, not a rival reading.** `A G K Q` likewise stands clear against the raw's `A G Iv Q` — the chronic raw `Iv` for `K` — and the run ascends A–G–K–Q.
2. **`E L M` (p. 273 n. 3)** — three ascending sorts, all unmistakable; the raw prints `ELM` unspaced and gets it right.
3. **`I K L M` (p. 273 n. 5)** — four sorts opening with a **single** upright, which is `I` by the one-upright rule; the ascent I–K–L–M confirms it. The raw prints `IKI.M`, mangling the `L`.
4. **`C O` (p. 273 n. 5)** — two unmistakable sorts inside the parenthesis; the raw prints `C 0`, its habitual `0` for `O`.
5. **`I M O V` (p. 273 n. 5, at the break)** — four ascending sorts, again opening on a single upright, and **this run is the last thing printed in the left block before the gutter** — see the runover below. The raw prints `I M 0 V`.
6. **`L`, `P`, `W` (p. 273 n. 5's continuation)** — three single sorts in the right block, each governing its own variant; `W` is the same sort that stood beside `T` on p. 272 n. 4.
7. **`D H` (p. 273 n. 6)** — **the third `H` admitted in Pars VI, and admitted on two independent grounds**: the glyph carries **two** uprights (a single upright there would have to be `I`), and the pair ascends D–H. The raw prints `D II`, flattening it into the roman numeral — **the typeface fact, not an OCR artifact**, exactly as the crossbar-less `H` behaved on pp. 238 and 246.
8. **`E K` and `C I K L M O` (p. 273 n. 7, forwarded)** — read off the band while establishing the leaf's total; `C I K L M O` opens on a single upright after `C` and ascends. Forwarded as band reads that `p6-c9` must re-derive.

**Digits settled off the band, each with something independent agreeing** (per the frozen rule). ★ **The `3`/`5` class dominates this leaf's footer four times over, and the raw is wrong in three of them — so it is no witness:**
- **★ p. 273 n. 2's `I. Tim. 1, 5` — a `3`/`5` decision settled by the quoted text itself** (the tier-B channel of the index QA rule). **The raw prints `I. Tim. 1,3`**; the plate's digit is flat-topped with a single bowl. **I Timothy 1:5 is *caritas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta*, which is word for word the body's `sit ex corde puro, conscientia bona et fide non ficta`; 1:3 is Paul's charge to remain at Ephesus.** Decisive. **`Marc. 12, 30`** in the same note is confirmed the same way: Mark 12:30 is *ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua*, verbatim the clause its anchor sits on.
- **★ p. 273 n. 4's `tom. IV. pag. 167, nota 1. et pag. 593, nota 2.` — a `1`/`4` decision and a `3`/`5` decision in one clause, and BOTH targets were checked to exist and to match the subject the note gives them.** **The raw prints `pag. 393`**; the plate's first digit is flat-topped with one bowl, and Vol IV's p. 593 is `bon-sent-IV-d23-a1-q3` *Quae sit materia extremae unctionis* — **the matter of extreme unction, which is the oil** ✓, while p. 167 is `bon-sent-IV-d7-a1-q2` *Utrum materia confirmationis sit necessaria* and `q3` — **the matter of confirmation, which is the chrism of oil and balsam** ✓. The note says *de significatione olei et balsami* and both pages are exactly that. `nota 1.` is a flag-and-stem `1`, the same sort as the `1` of `167` and of `10, 32`, and plainly not the entry numeral `⁴` eight characters to its left.
- **p. 273 n. 4's `Matth. 10, 32`** — confirmed by its own subject: Matthew 10:32 is *omnis ergo qui confitebitur me coram hominibus, confitebor et ego eum coram Patre meo*, which is the `fieri habet coram Deo et hominibus` its anchor sits on ✓. The raw prints it correctly.
- **★ p. 273 n. 1's `tom. I. pag. 707, nota 5.` — checked to EXIST and to match.** Vol I's p. 707 is `bon-sent-I-d40-a2-q1`, whose body prints **`Est enim *veritas adaequatio rei et intellectus*`** with a Quaracchi note on it — **the definition of truth, which is precisely what this note says it is going to find there**, and which the body here quotes as *adaequatio intellectus, sermonis et rei* ✓. The raw prints `nota '6` and is worthless.
- **p. 273 n. 3's `II. Phys. text. 88. seqq. (c. 9.)`** — *Physics* II c. 9 is the chapter on necessity in natural things, the locus of *finis imponit necessitatem his quae sunt ad finem* which the note is annotating ✓. The raw reproduces this one correctly.
- **★ p. 273 n. 6's `(11. Nov.)` — a `1`/`4` decision settled by an external fact.** The raw prints `(H. Nov.)`, flattening the two uprights into an `H` exactly as it does the siglum. **St Martin of Tours' feast is 11 November**, and the note is citing the third antiphon of that feast's first Nocturn ✓. In the same note `§ 4` and `c. 4.` carry the closed triangular counter and crossing horizontal of a true `4` against those uprights, and `pag. 745`, `pag. 155` and `tom. XI.` stand clear at 4.6×. The raw prints `$ l`, `c. i.` and `pag. 1SS` — **wrong in both classes inside one entry.**
- **p. 272 n. 8's `IV. Sent. d. 7. per totam` — checked to EXIST and to match the subject.** `bon-sent-IV-d7-*` exists as twelve chunks and **is the distinction on confirmation** (*Utrum in confirmatione sit necessaria forma verborum*, *Utrum materia confirmationis sit necessaria*, *Utrum quilibet possit dispensare confirmationem*, …) ✓ — so *per totam* has something to name, and this chapter's *forma vocalis*, *chrisma* and *manus episcopi* are its three articles in order. The `7` sits in no confusion class and both witnesses agree on it.

**⚠ TWO `[?]` FLAGS TRAVEL FORWARD, NEITHER RESOLVED, NEITHER RE-FLAGGED, AND NO NEW ONE IS RAISED HERE.**
1. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 271 n. 2, `E F G H minus, aptae ponunt et`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c6`, whose entry carries it; `p6-c6` flagged it, `p6-c7` re-examined it and recorded **no disposition**). **p. 271 is off this chunk's leaves entirely, nothing read here bears on it, and it is neither resolved nor re-flagged.** It stands as `p6-c6` left it and is forwarded to `p6-c9` unchanged.
2. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 272 n. 6, `Respicitur Col. 6, 12.`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c7`, whose entry carries it). **This chunk's own band pass over p. 272's right register — the same block that holds this chunk's n. 8 — read the entry again at 4.6× and reached `Col. 6, 12` exactly as `p6-c7` did**, in the same three sorts the same footer uses for the genuine `Col. 1, 13` one entry above. That **confirms the plate reading a second time but settles nothing about the emendation**, since Colossians still has four chapters and the sense still requires Ephes. 6:12. **No disposition is recorded: it is neither resolved nor re-flagged as new**, and `build-citations.py`'s QA line on it remains expected behaviour, not a defect. Forwarded to `p6-c9`.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order): p. 272 right column — "Thesis 1." — "Thesis 2." — "Thesis 3." — "Ratio."; p. 273 left column — "Triplex conformatio ad veritatem." — "Proprietates 3 confessionis." — "Pro thesi 1." — "Confessio sit integra." — "Pro thesi 2." — "Sit placida."; p. 273 right column — "Sit intrepida." ★ **Eleven glosses, and the form BREAKS the one-to-one answering series that Cap. VII and Cap. VI both used.** Cap. VIII sets three theses and a *Ratio*, but only **two** `Pro thesi` glosses follow, and the third member is answered by a bare `Sit intrepida.` with no `Pro thesi 3.` at all; meanwhile two free topical glosses (`Triplex conformatio ad veritatem.`, `Proprietates 3 confessionis.`) and two more predicate glosses (`Confessio sit integra.`, `Sit placida.`) run alongside. **So the series is `Pro thesi 1.` + `Confessio sit integra.`, `Pro thesi 2.` + `Sit placida.`, and then `Sit intrepida.` standing alone — a pairing that decays across the chapter.** Nothing was inferred from Cap. VII or Cap. VI in advance; this is the count after the fact, and it is the fourth consecutive chapter with a different gloss shape. Glosses stand in the outer margin of each column — left of column 1, right of column 2 — and the raw's rendering (`Propriei.i[os .1 cojifessio- uf».`, `Pro ihesi i.`, `sit inirepi.`, `wia/iiw poteslatioa`) is unusable; all eleven are band reads.

**★ p. 273 CARRIES A PRINTER'S SIGNATURE AND IT IS DUE.** `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` stands at the foot of p. 273's left footer block, immediately below n. 5's broken-off last line, and the quire number **`35`** stands at the foot of the right block below n. 7. The last was p. 265's (`S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` with quire `34`), so **the eight-leaf cadence holds exactly**. Neither line was mistaken for a footer entry, and neither is transcribed into the apparatus.

**Raw-quality grade, per page and per region** (the raw was a cross-check only, never the base): **p. 272 body (right column, the Cap. VIII portion) — good**, readable continuously with the usual ligature damage (`Cap. VIH.`, `Dc intcjjritate confirmatimiis.`, `requirilur`, `coramuncm`, `Sigiio`, `clirismate`, `balsarao`, `verliorum`, `re[iarativum`); this is a **better** grade than `p6-c7` gave the same leaf's LEFT column, so the two columns of p. 272 grade differently in opposite directions from its two footer blocks. **p. 272 footer — as `p6-c7` graded it, the worst of that leaf**, and it is wrong here too: `L exigitur` for `E exigitur`, `A G Iv Q` for `A G K Q`, `iiig,` for `nis.`, `^Somano` for `Romano`. **p. 273 body — the left column is the worse** (`lilpndo (lcprnmnt mnfc^sinnc ilcliitn`, `a(lac(|uatio`, `ralunivi`, `voutnfaUi`, `mtiiUis`, `consciciilia buna el, p.de non ficla`, `coneqiinlcm`, `piisillanimis`, `taiuplam`), the right column noticeably cleaner (`intrepida`, `verecundiam`, `triiimpbnle vexillum`, `praedicarem`) — **grade the columns separately on this leaf too.** **p. 273 footer — wrong in four digits** (`nota '6`, `Tim. 1,3`, `pag. 393`, `$ l` / `pag. 1SS, c. i.`), **flattened in one siglum** (`D II`) and mangled in another (`IKI.M`), while reproducing nn. 3, 5 and 7 substantially right — **grade per block, not per page.**

**Runover tests — TWO RUN, ONE POSITIVE, ONE NEGATIVE; both closed from BOTH sides.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 272 → p. 273 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 272's right block ends **complete** at n. 8's `…Post *crucis* aliqui codd. addunt *et*.`, with blank paper beneath it, and **p. 273's left block opens NUMBERED** at `¹ De hac veritatis definitione cfr. tom. I. pag. 707, nota 5.`
- *p. 273's own gutter — **POSITIVE**, and logged as `p.273 n.5:gutter`.* The left block's last entry, n. 5, **breaks off mid-clause inside a siglum run's variant** at `Subinde pro *propulsandam* I M O V`, and **p. 273's right block opens UNNUMBERED** with `*propellendam*, L *repellendam*, et pro *potestativa* P *episcopi*, W *pontificum*.` — the sigla `I M O V` stranded from the very word they govern. Rendered joined in the `p273-5` entry. ★ **The straddling note is Cap. VIII's own, so the test is closed and logged here rather than forwarded** — and note that the printer's signature line `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` sits between the break and the foot, which is exactly the kind of intervening line that could be mistaken for the entry's end.
- *NOT re-logged here:* **`p.272 n.5:gutter` (`p6-c7`, POSITIVE) and the p. 271 → p. 272 page-crossing test (`p6-c7`, NEGATIVE)**; `p.270 n.4:gutter`, the p. 270 → p. 271 test and p. 271's own gutter test (all three `p6-c6`); `p.269 n.4:gutter` and the p. 269 → p. 270 test (both `p6-c5`); `p.268 n.4:gutter` and the p. 268 → p. 269 test (both `p6-c4`); `p.267 n.4:gutter` and the p. 267 → p. 268 test (both `p6-c3`); `p.266 n.3:gutter` and the p. 266 → p. 267 test (both `p6-c2`); p. 265's own gutter test and the p. 265 → p. 266 test (both `p6-c1`); the p. 264 → p. 265 test, p. 264's own gutter test and the p. 263 → p. 264 test (all `p5-c10`); and everything on `p6-c1`'s through `p6-c7`'s own do-not-re-log lists. Corpus-wide runover and chunk totals are **not written here** — derive them with `tools/check-vol5-census.py`.

**★ WHAT THIS CHUNK FORWARDS TO `bon-brev-p6-c9`.** p. 272 is **fully consumed** — eight notes, eight anchors, nothing left. **p. 273's register was band-read IN FULL and its total of 7 is entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`**; this chunk owns nn. 1–6, and **n. 7 anchors in Cap. IX in the RIGHT column and is `p6-c9`'s.** Stated with its verification level, claiming nothing more: **the BLOCK position, the VERBATIM TEXT, the ANCHOR COLUMN (RIGHT) and the anchor WORD of n. 7 were all read off the bands** (`super panem scilicet: Hoc est ⁷ corpus meum`, in Cap. IX's *Thesis 1*).
- n. **7** `E K addunt *enim*. Inferius post *sanguinis mei* K addit *etc.*, et pro *in quarum* C I K L M O *sub quarum*. Subinde post *circumscriptibiliter* Vat., 1 et 3 addunt *nec localiter*.`
★ **EVERY DIGIT AND SIGLUM IN n. 7 IS UNVERIFIED**, notwithstanding that it was read carefully: the edition sigla `1 et 3` sit squarely in the `3`/`5` class, and the runs `E K` and `C I K L M O` come off a single band pass, with `K` the chronic raw-corruption sort. **Re-derive all of it. A hand-off is a claim to re-derive, never a fact to adopt** — and check the narrative summary above against the per-note list it sits beside, never the reverse. `bon-brev-p6-c9` owns p. 273 from n. 7 onward, **must NOT re-log p. 273's own gutter test (closed POSITIVE and logged here as `p.273 n.5:gutter`) nor the p. 272 → p. 273 test (closed NEGATIVE here)**, owes **the p. 273 → p. 274 page-crossing test and p. 274's own gutter test**, and must extract p. 274 fresh with no constant. Cap. IX (`De integritate eucharistiae`) opens ~45 % down p. 273's RIGHT column with a ONE-line subtitle and a `Thesis 1.` gloss; **its end must be set from the `Cap. X.` heading on the band and from nothing else** — and note that the index gives Cap. X's opening as p. 275, i.e. **Cap. IX runs two printed pages on the index's own showing**, which is a hypothesis and not a span. **Both `[?]` flags travel forward unresolved: p. 271 n. 2's `minus, aptae` and p. 272 n. 6's `Col. 6, 12`.**

**Register — the confirmation vocabulary was CONSULTED from the Vol IV settlement, not coined here, and Pars VI's own vocabulary was FOLLOWED, not re-decided.** `p6-c1`'s sacramental core, `p6-c2`'s historical-dispensation vocabulary, `p6-c3`'s seven sacrament names, `p6-c4`'s institution vocabulary, `p6-c5`'s dispensation-and-minister vocabulary, `p6-c6`'s iteration-and-character vocabulary and `p6-c7`'s *integritas* vocabulary all stand unchanged. **Vol IV chunks consulted for this chapter (all of d.7, which p. 272 n. 8 cites *per totam*):** `bon-sent-IV-d7-divisio`, `bon-sent-IV-d7-littera`, `bon-sent-IV-d7-a1-q1` (*Utrum in confirmatione sit necessaria forma verborum* — where the very form `confirmo te chrismate salutis, in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti, Amen` is set out), `bon-sent-IV-d7-a1-q2` (*Utrum materia confirmationis sit necessaria* — the chrism of oil and balsam, and the target of p. 273 n. 4), `bon-sent-IV-d7-a1-q3` and `a2-q1` (the bishop as minister), `bon-sent-IV-d7-a2-q2`–`q3` and `a3-q1`–`q3` (the *robur* and the *pugil*), and `bon-sent-IV-d23-a1-q3` (*Quae sit materia extremae unctionis*, the second target of p. 273 n. 4). **Carried from that settlement:** *chrisma* → "chrism", *unctio / ungere* → "unction / to anoint", *balsamum* → "balsam", *frons* → "forehead", *episcopus* → "bishop" and *Pontifex / pontificalis* → "Pontiff / pontifical" kept distinct, *impositio manuum* → "the imposition of hands", *robur* → "strength", **and *pugil* → "champion"** (Vol IV d.7 a.3: *ut pugil inungitur homo ad proeliandum*), *character* untranslated, *forma / materia* → "form / matter". **Also carried, from the corpus at large:** *complacentia* → "complacency" (Vol I d.1 / d.10) and *potestativa* → "potestative" (Vol III), so `manus potestativa` reads "a potestative hand" rather than being flattened to "powerful". **Fixed here for the rest of the per-sacrament run:** *integer / integra* → "entire" (with *integritas* → "integrity" and *integrari* → "to be made entire", per `p6-c7` — the three must answer each other, since this chapter turns on *confessio integra* / *integritas confessionis* / *integrari debet hoc Sacramentum* in one paragraph); *placida* → "pleasing" (not "placid" — the text glosses it *Deo non potest placere*); *intrepida* → "intrepid"; *nitor / nitidus* → "brightness / bright" against *odor* → "odor" and *odoriferus* → "fragrant", so Bonaventure's light-and-scent pair survives; *fama* → "repute" throughout (so *odor bonae famae* and *tam vitae quam famae* answer each other); *pusillanimis* → "pusillanimous"; *verecundia* → "bashfulness" against *pudor* → "shame" and *formido* → "dread"; *cunei* → "wedges" (the military sense the antiphon in n. 6 confirms); *vexillum* → "standard". Quaracchi's em-dash articulations are preserved, and Bonaventure's *quia/cum/ideo* chains are kept as one English sentence throughout — the *Ratio* period runs as a single sentence across the page break, as do the *Quia vero*, *Amplius* and *Postremo* periods.


site: bonaventure

collection: Breviloquium

title: Pars 6, Cap. 9

title_alt:
De integritate eucharistiae
On the integrity of the eucharist

author: St. Bonaventure

languages: en la

title: Opera Omnia (Quaracchi critical edition)

publisher: Collegii S. Bonaventurae

source_text:
<!-- page 273 -->

### Capitulum IX. *De integritate eucharistiae.*

De Sacramento *eucharistiae* hoc tenendum est, quod in hoc Sacramento verum Christi corpus et verus sanguis non tantum significatur, verum etiam veraciter continetur sub duplici specie, panis scilicet et vini, tanquam sub uno, non sub duplici Sacramento; hoc autem est post consecrationem sacerdotalem, quae fit in prolatione vocalis formae a Domino institutae; super panem scilicet: Hoc est[^p273-7] corpus meum; super vinum vero: Hic est calix sanguinis mei. Quibus verbis cum intentione conficiendi a sacerdote prolatis, transsubstantiatur utrumque elementum secundum substantiam in corpus et sanguinem Iesu Christi; remanentibus speciebus sensibilibus, in quarum utraque continetur *totaliter*, non *circumscriptibiliter*, sed *sacramentaliter* totus Christus. — In quibus etiam proponitur nobis ut cibus, quem qui digne accipit, non solum sacramentaliter, verum etiam per fidem et caritatem spiritualiter manducando, corpori Christi mystico magis incorporatur et in se ipso
<!-- page 274 -->
reficitur et purgatur; qui vero indigne accedit *iudicium sibi manducat et bibit, non diiudicans* sanctissimum *corpus Christi*[^p274-1].

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia principium nostrum reparativum, Verbum scilicet incarnatum, et *sufficientissimum* est in virtute et *sapientissimum* in sensu; ideo sic nobis contulit Sacramenta, secundum quod exigit *sapientia et sufficientia* sua[^p274-2]. — Et quia *sufficientissimum* est, ideo in largiendo medicamenta morborum et charismata gratiarum non tantum instituit Sacramentum, quod nos in *esse* gratiae *generaret*, ut baptismum, et genitos *augmentaret* et roboraret, ut confirmationem, verum etiam quod genitos et augmentatos *enutriret*, ut Sacramentum eucharistiae; propter quod haec tria Sacramenta omnibus dantur, qui accedunt ad fidem. Quoniam ergo nutrimentum nostrum quantum ad *esse* gratuitum attenditur in unoquoque fidelium per conservationem *devotionis* ad Deum, *dilectionis* ad proximum et *delectationis* intra se ipsum; et *devotio* ad Deum exercetur per sacrificii oblationem, *dilectio* ad proximum per unius Sacramenti communionem, et *delectatio* intra se ipsum per viatici refectionem: hinc est, quod principium nostrum reparativum istud Sacramentum eucharistiae dedit in *sacrificium* oblationis et *Sacramentum* communionis et *viaticum* refectionis.

Quia vero principium nostrum reparativum non tantum est sufficientissimum, verum etiam *sapientissimum*, cuius est omnia agere ordinate; ideo sic dedit et disposuit nobis *sacrificium, Sacramentum* et *viaticum* exhibere, secundum quod competit *tempori gratiae revelatae, statui viae* et *capacitati nostrae*. — Primo igitur, quoniam *tempus gratiae revelatae* requirit, quod iam non offeratur *oblatio* qualiscumque, sed *pura, placida* et *plenaria*[^p274-3]; et nulla alia est talis, nisi illa quae fuit in cruce oblata, scilicet Christi corpus et sanguis: hinc est, quod necessario oportet in hoc Sacramento non tantum figurative, verum etiam veraciter corpus Christi tanquam *oblationem* huic tempori debitam contineri. — Similiter, quia *tempori gratiae* consonat, quod *Sacramentum* communionis et dilectionis non tantum sit communionem et dilectionem significans, verum etiam ad illam inflammans, ut « efficiat quod figurat[^p274-4] »; et quod maxime nos inflammat ad dilectionem mutuam et maxime unit membra est unitas capitis, a quo per vim amoris diffusivam, unitivam et transformativam manat in nos dilectio mutua: hinc est, quod in hoc Sacramento continetur verum Christi corpus et caro immaculata ut se nobis diffundens et nos invicem uniens et in se transformans per ardentissimam caritatem, per quam se nobis dedit, se pro nobis obtulit et se nobis reddidit et nobiscum existit usque ad finem mundi[^p274-5]. — Per hunc etiam modum *refectio* competens *statui gratiae* est refectio *spiritualis, communis* et *salutaris*. Refectio autem spiritus est verbum vitae[^p274-6], ac per hoc refectio spiritualis *spiritus in carne* est Verbum incarnatum seu caro Verbi, quae cibus est *communis* et *salutaris*, quia, licet sit una, omnes tamen salvantur per ipsam. Quia ergo non est dare alium cibum *spiritualem, communem* et *salutiferum* nisi ipsum verum Christi corpus; hinc est, quod necesse est, ipsum in hoc Sacramento veraciter esse contentum, exigente hoc perfectione *sacrificii* placativi, *Sacramenti* unitivi et *viatici* refectivi; quae debent esse in tempore novi testamenti et gratiae revelatae et veritatis Christi.

Rursus, quia *statui viae* non competit Christum aperte videre, propter velamen aenigmatis et propter meritum fidei; nec convenit Christi carnem dentibus attrectare et propter horrorem cruditatis[^p274-7] et immortalitatem ipsius corporis: ideo necesse fuit, corpus et sanguinem Christi tradi velatum sacratissimis symbolis et similitudinibus congruis et expressis. Et quoniam nihil magis est idoneum ad *refectionem* quam cibus panis et potus vini; nihil est etiam magis idoneum ad *significationem* unitatis corporis Christi veri et mystici, quam panis factus de mundissimis granis et vinum expressum de purissimis acinis in unum collectis[^p274-8]: ideo sub his speciebus magis quam sub aliis debuit Sacramentum istud exhiberi. Et quia Christus sub illis speciebus esse debebat non secundum mutationem factam in *ipso*, sed potius in *eis*; ideo ad prolationem duplicis verbi praedicti, in quo insinuatur existentia Christi sub speciebus illis, fit conversio substantiae utriusque in corpus et sanguinem, remanentibus solis accidentibus tanquam signis ipsius corporis contentivis et etiam expressivis.

Quia vero corpus Christi beatum et gloriosum non potest dividi in partes suas nec separari ab anima neque a Divinitate summa; ideo sub utraque specie est unus Christus et totus et indivisus, scilicet corpus et anima et Deus; ac per hoc utrobique est *unum* et simplicissimum Sacramentum continens totum Christum. Et quoniam quaelibet pars speciei significat corpus Christi; hinc est, quod totum sic
<!-- page 275 -->
est in tota specie, quod in qualibet eius parte, sive sit integra, sive divisa; ac per hoc non est ibi ut circumscriptum, ut occupans locum, ut[^p275-1] habens situm, ut perceptibile per aliquem sensum corporeum et humanum, sed omnem latens sensum, ut fides habeat locum et meritum. Propter quod etiam, ut non deprehendatur, accidentia illa habent omnem operationem, quam etiam habebant prius, licet sint praeter subiectum, quamdiu intra se continent Christi corpus; quod quidem est, quamdiu durant in suis proprietatibus naturalibus et sunt idonea ad cibandum.

Postremo, quoniam *capacitas nostra* ad Christum efficaciter suscipiendum non est in carne, sed in spiritu, non in ventre, sed in mente; et mens Christum non attingit nisi per cognitionem et amorem, per fidem et caritatem, ita quod fides illuminat ad recogitationem[^p275-2], et caritas inflammat ad devotionem: ideo ad hoc, quod aliquis digne accedat, oportet, quod *spiritualiter* comedat, ut sic per recogitationem fidei masticet, per devotionem amoris suscipiat; per quae non in se transformet Christum, sed ipse potius traiiciatur in eius mysticum corpus. — Propter quod manifeste colligitur, quod qui tepide, indevote et inconsiderate accedit *iudicium sibi manducat et bibit*[^p275-3], quia tanto Sacramento contumeliam facit. Et ideo consilium est his qui se sentiunt minus mundos mente, vel carne, vel etiam indevotos, ut differant, quousque parati ad esum veri Agni mundi, devoti et circumspecti accedant.

Propter quod etiam hoc Sacramentum praeceptum est celebrari cum solemnitate praecipua tam quantum ad *locum* quam etiam quantum ad *tempus* et quantum ad *verba* et *orationes* et quantum ad *vestimenta* in celebratione Missarum; ut tam ipsi sacerdotes conficientes quam etiam suscipientes percipiant[^p275-4] gratiae donum, per quam purgentur, illuminentur, perficiantur, reficiantur, vivificentur et in ipsum Christum per excessivum amorem ardentissime transferantur.

---

english:
### Chapter IX. *On the integrity of the eucharist.*

Concerning the Sacrament of the *eucharist* this must be held: that in this Sacrament the true body of Christ and his true blood are not only signified, but also truly contained under a twofold species, namely of bread and of wine, as under one, not under a twofold Sacrament; and this is after the priestly consecration, which takes place in the utterance of the vocal form instituted by the Lord; over the bread, namely: This is[^p273-7] my body; and over the wine: This is the chalice of my blood. When these words have been uttered by a priest with the intention of consecrating, each element is transubstantiated according to its substance into the body and blood of Jesus Christ; the sensible species remaining, in each of which the whole Christ is contained *totally*, not *circumscriptibly*, but *sacramentally*. — In which he is also set before us as food, and whoever receives it worthily — eating not only sacramentally but also spiritually through faith and charity — is the more incorporated into the mystical body of Christ, and in his own self is
<!-- page 274 -->
refreshed and purged; but he who approaches unworthily *eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning* the most holy *body of Christ*[^p274-1].

Now the reason for the understanding of the aforesaid is this: since our reparative principle, the Word namely incarnate, is both *most sufficient* in power and *most wise* in understanding; therefore he has so bestowed the Sacraments upon us as his *wisdom and sufficiency* require[^p274-2]. — And because he is *most sufficient*, therefore, in the bestowing of the medicines of diseases and of the charisms of graces, he instituted not only a Sacrament which should *beget* us into the *being* of grace, as baptism, and should *augment* and strengthen those begotten, as confirmation, but also one which should *nourish* those begotten and augmented, as the Sacrament of the eucharist; on account of which these three Sacraments are given to all who come to the faith. Since therefore our nourishment, as regards gratuitous *being*, is attended to in each of the faithful through the preservation of *devotion* toward God, of *love* toward the neighbour and of *delight* within himself; and *devotion* toward God is exercised through the oblation of the sacrifice, *love* toward the neighbour through the communion of the one Sacrament, and *delight* within himself through the refection of the viaticum: hence it is that our reparative principle gave this Sacrament of the eucharist as a *sacrifice* of oblation and a *Sacrament* of communion and a *viaticum* of refection.

But because our reparative principle is not only most sufficient but also *most wise*, whose part it is to do all things in an ordered way; therefore he so gave and disposed to set forth for us the *sacrifice, the Sacrament* and the *viaticum* as befits *the time of revealed grace, the state of the wayfarer* and *our capacity*. — First then, since *the time of revealed grace* requires that there be no longer offered *an oblation* of just any kind, but one *pure, pleasing* and *plenary*[^p274-3]; and no other is such except that which was offered on the cross, namely the body and blood of Christ: hence it is that necessarily it behooves the body of Christ to be contained in this Sacrament not only figuratively but also truly, as the *oblation* due to this time. — Likewise, because it accords with *the time of grace* that the *Sacrament* of communion and of love should not only be signifying communion and love, but also enkindling unto it, so that it may « effect what it figures[^p274-4] »; and that which most of all enkindles us to mutual love and most of all unites the members is the unity of the head, from whom, by the diffusive, unitive and transformative power of love, mutual love flows into us: hence it is that in this Sacrament there is contained the true body of Christ and his immaculate flesh, as diffusing itself to us and uniting us to one another and transforming us into itself through that most ardent charity by which he gave himself to us, offered himself for us and restored himself to us and abides with us unto the end of the world[^p274-5]. — In this manner also the *refection* befitting *the state of grace* is a *spiritual, common* and *salutary* refection. But the refection of the spirit is the word of life[^p274-6], and through this the spiritual refection which is *spirit in flesh* is the Word incarnate, or the flesh of the Word, which is food *common* and *salutary*, because, although it is one, yet all are saved through it. Since therefore no other food *spiritual, common* and *salvific* can be given except the true body of Christ itself; hence it is that it is necessary that it be truly contained in this Sacrament, this being required by the perfection of the propitiatory *sacrifice*, of the unitive *Sacrament* and of the refective *viaticum*; which ought to be in the time of the new testament and of revealed grace and of the truth of Christ.

Again, because it does not befit *the state of the wayfarer* to see Christ openly, on account of the veil of the enigma and on account of the merit of faith; nor is it fitting to handle the flesh of Christ with the teeth, both on account of the horror of rawness[^p274-7] and on account of the immortality of that body: therefore it was necessary that the body and blood of Christ be handed over veiled under most sacred symbols and under congruous and expressive likenesses. And since nothing is more suited to *refection* than the food of bread and the drink of wine; nothing also is more suited to the *signification* of the unity of the body of Christ, the true and the mystical, than bread made of the purest grains and wine pressed out of the cleanest berries gathered into one[^p274-8]: therefore under these species rather than under others ought this Sacrament to be set forth. And because Christ had to be under those species not according to a change made in *himself*, but rather in *them*; therefore, at the utterance of the aforesaid twofold word, in which the existence of Christ under those species is intimated, there takes place a conversion of the substance of each into his body and blood, only the accidents remaining, as signs both containing and also expressing that body.

But because the blessed and glorious body of Christ cannot be divided into its parts nor separated from the soul nor from the supreme Divinity; therefore under each species there is one Christ, whole and undivided, namely body and soul and God; and through this in both there is *one* and most simple Sacrament containing the whole Christ. And since any part whatever of the species signifies the body of Christ; hence it is that the whole is so
<!-- page 275 -->
in the whole species that it is in any part of it whatever, whether it be entire or divided; and through this he is not there as circumscribed, as occupying a place, as[^p275-1] having position, as perceptible through any bodily and human sense, but as lying hidden from every sense, that faith may have place and merit. On account of which also, that he may not be detected, those accidents have every operation which they had before, although they are without a subject, so long as they contain the body of Christ within themselves; which indeed is so long as they endure in their natural properties and are fit for feeding.

Lastly, since *our capacity* for receiving Christ efficaciously is not in the flesh but in the spirit, not in the belly but in the mind; and the mind does not attain Christ except through knowledge and love, through faith and charity, so that faith illumines unto recollection[^p275-2], and charity enkindles unto devotion: therefore, for this, that anyone may approach worthily, it is required that he eat *spiritually*, so that thus through the recollection of faith he may chew, and through the devotion of love receive; by which things he does not transform Christ into himself, but he himself is rather translated into Christ's mystical body. — On account of which it is manifestly gathered that whoever approaches tepidly, undevoutly and inconsiderately *eats and drinks judgment to himself*[^p275-3], because he does an outrage to so great a Sacrament. And therefore the counsel is given to those who feel themselves less clean in mind, or in flesh, or even undevout, that they defer, until, prepared for the eating of the true Lamb of the world, they approach devout and circumspect.

On account of which also this Sacrament is commanded to be celebrated with a special solemnity as much as regards *place* as also as regards *time* and as regards *words* and *prayers* and as regards *vestments* in the celebration of Masses; that both the priests themselves who consecrate and also those who receive may take[^p275-4] the gift of grace, through which they may be purged, illumined, perfected, refreshed, vivified, and through excessive love most ardently transferred into Christ himself.

---

la: E K addunt *enim*. Inferius post *sanguinis mei* K addit *etc.*, et pro *in quarum* C I K L M O *sub quarum*. Subinde post *circumscriptibiliter* Vat., 1 et 3 addunt *nec localiter*.

en: E, K add *enim*. Below, after *sanguinis mei*, K adds *etc.*, and for *in quarum*, C, I, K, L, M, O read *sub quarum*. Thereafter, after *circumscriptibiliter*, the Vatican edition and editions 1 and 3 add *nec localiter*.

la: Epist. I. Cor. 11, 29. Ed. 1 cum Vulgata *corpus Domini*. — De eucharistia agitur IV. Sent. d. 8-13.

en: Epistle I Corinthians 11:29. Edition 1, with the Vulgate, reads *corpus Domini*. — The eucharist is treated in IV *Sent.* d. 8–13.

la: Vat. *efficientia sua*.

en: The Vatican edition reads *efficientia sua*.

la: Cfr. Hebr. 9, 10.

en: Cf. Hebrews 9:10.

la: Quo loquendi modo utitur secundum Augustinum Magister Sent., in lit. IV. Sent. d. IV. c. 1.

en: Which manner of speaking the Master of the Sentences uses, following Augustine, in the text of IV *Sent.* d. IV, c. 1.

la: Matth. 28, 20: Et ecce, ego vobiscum sum etc. Tit. 2, 14: Qui dedit semetipsum pro nobis, ut nos redimeret etc. — Pro *ad finem* plures codd. *in finem*. Superius pro *diffundens* B melius *infundens*.

en: Matthew 28:20: "And behold, I am with you" etc. Titus 2:14: "Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us" etc. — For *ad finem*, several codices read *in finem*. Above, for *diffundens*, B reads, better, *infundens*.

la: Cfr. Ioan. 6, 69.

en: Cf. John 6:69.

la: Cfr. IV. Sent. lit. Magistri, d. XI. c. 3. — Codd. et 2 *crudelitatis*.

en: Cf. IV *Sent.*, the text of the Master, d. XI, c. 3. — The codices and edition 2 read *crudelitatis*.

la: Secundum August., in Ioan. Evang. tr. 26. n. 17. Cfr. IV. Sent. lit. Magistri, d. VIII. c. 7. — Inferius pro *in quo* Vat., 1 et 3 cum uno alteroque cod. *in qua*.

en: According to Augustine, *On the Gospel of John*, tract 26, n. 17. Cf. IV *Sent.*, the text of the Master, d. VIII, c. 7. — Below, for *in quo*, the Vatican edition and editions 1 and 3, with one or another codex, read *in qua*.

la: Edd., excepta 2, *vel*. Pro *ut perceptibile* 1 *aut perceptibile*. Aliquanto inferius pro *idoneae* cum E substituimus *idonea*.

en: The editions, edition 2 excepted, read *vel*. For *ut perceptibile*, edition 1 reads *aut perceptibile*. Somewhat below, for *idoneae*, we have substituted, with E, *idonea*.

la: Ed. 2 cum pluribus codd. *recognitionem* (sed vide IV. Sent. d. 9. a. 1. q. 2.), Vat., 1 et 3 *recognitionem vel recordationem*. Idem recurrit inferius, ubi pro *ut sic per recogitationem*, quod exhibent B M, alii codd. et edd. substituunt *ut sic* [Vat., 1 et 3 addunt *Christum*] *per recordationem*. Superius pro *in carne* permulti codd. et 2 *a carne*, ac pro *in spiritu* E P T W et 2 *a spiritu*.

en: Edition 2, with several codices, reads *recognitionem* (but see IV *Sent.* d. 9, a. 1, q. 2), the Vatican edition and editions 1 and 3 *recognitionem vel recordationem*. The same recurs below, where for *ut sic per recogitationem*, which B, M exhibit, the other codices and the editions substitute *ut sic* [the Vatican edition and editions 1 and 3 add *Christum*] *per recordationem*. Above, for *in carne*, very many codices and edition 2 read *a carne*, and for *in spiritu*, E, P, T, W and edition 2 read *a spiritu*.

la: Epist. I. Cor. 11, 29. — Mox pro *contumeliam* plures codd. *iniuriam*. Subinde pro *ut differant* 2 *ire differant*.

en: Epistle I Corinthians 11:29. — Presently, for *contumeliam*, several codices read *iniuriam*. Thereafter, for *ut differant*, edition 2 reads *ire differant*.

la: I M V *percipientes suscipiant*, qui etiam inferius cum nonnullis aliis codd. pro *excessivum* substituunt *excellentissimum*; 2 legit: *per excellentissimum amorem et excessivum*. Pro *transferantur* P *transformentur*.

en: I, M, V read *percipientes suscipiant*; and these, below also, together with some other codices, substitute *excellentissimum* for *excessivum*; edition 2 reads: *per excellentissimum amorem et excessivum*. For *transferantur*, P reads *transformentur*. ---

translators_notes:
**★★ PAGE SPAN — pp. 273–275, THREE LEAVES, AND BOTH ENDS ARE FIXED POSITIVELY FROM HEADINGS.** `CAP. IX.` with the **ONE-line** subtitle `De integritate eucharistiae.` stands centred in p. 273's RIGHT column about **45 %** down the leaf, two lines below Cap. VIII's closing `…crucis gloriam non praedicarem ⁶ ».` — where `bon-brev-p6-c8` said it stood, and re-set here line by line off the band rather than adopted. **The title is taken from THIS heading, never from the volume index**, whose Pars VI titles are OCR-garbled throughout the block (the index prints `Dc integrilatc cucliaristiae`). Cap. IX fills the rest of p. 273's right column, crossing the leaf **MID-CLAUSE** (p. 273's right column ends `…magis incorporatur et in se ipso` and p. 274's left column opens `reficitur et purgatur`); fills p. 274's left column entire, crossing that leaf's gutter **MID-CLAUSE again** (left column ends `…manat in nos dilectio mutua: hinc` and the right column opens `est, quod in hoc Sacramento continetur`); fills p. 274's right column entire, crossing to p. 275 **MID-CLAUSE a third time** (`…quod totum sic` / `est in tota specie`); and closes about **65 %** down p. 275's **LEFT** column at `…ardentissime transferantur.`

**★★ THE CLOSE IS ESTABLISHED FROM THE `CAP. X.` HEADING AND FROM NOTHING ELSE.** `CAP. X.` with the ONE-line subtitle `De integritate poenitentiae.` stands centred in p. 275's **LEFT** column, with Cap. X's opening beneath it in the same column (`De Sacramento *poenitentiae* hoc tenendum est, quod ipsa est « secunda tabula post naufragium ⁵ »…` beside a fresh `Thesis 1.` gloss). **The volume index's "Cap. X on p. 275" turns out to be right, and its silent implication that Cap. IX spans 273–274 turns out to be WRONG by a leaf** — the chapter runs onto p. 275 and consumes two thirds of its left column. That is the index under-reporting a span for the ninth time in this work, exactly as the resume note's caution 2 warned; **the index was used for nothing here and the span was read off the plate from end to end.** The running head was likewise used for nothing: **p. 274's reads `BREVILOQUII PARS VI. C. IX.` and is for once correct, and p. 275's reads `PARS VI. C. X.` while two thirds of its left column is still Cap. IX** — the seventh consecutive leaf on which the running head is an unreliable witness, and a reminder that its being right on one leaf is not evidence about the next. No inference was drawn from white space at any column foot — **p. 274's left column foot carries a large blank of some fifteen lines and it is not a boundary**, exactly the shape that wrote `bon-brev-p2-c4` short — and the fact that Cap. IX's tail (`…ardentissime transferantur.`) is a grammatically complete sentence closing a rhetorical crescendo was not treated as evidence of anything; the `CAP. X.` heading below it is.

**Gutters — one re-derived from the hand-off, two settled fresh with no constant, and all three leaves are SKEWED.**
- **p. 273 = 1164, RE-DERIVED rather than re-used.** The hand-off forwarded 1164 as "safe to reuse," and it was measured again from the beginning anyway. `colcrop.py vol5 273` with no constant returns **1161 on a 54 px run** — below the 60 px trust floor and therefore not adopted on its own showing. Thirteen row windows reproduce `p6-c8`'s measurement window for window: two blow out (20–40 % → 1283/**283 px** · 25–45 % → 1241/**201 px**) and the **ten** survivors run 1158–1172 on runs 59–63 px, **drifting monotonically down the leaf**. Step 3 reproduces the predecessor exactly: the blank band runs **x ≈ 1138–1189** and Quaracchi's printed column rule stands inside it as a **skewed** ink island peaking **382 rows**; band midpoint 1163.5, rule centre ≈ 1164. **1164 confirmed and adopted.**
- **★★ p. 274 = 1403, SETTLED FRESH WITH NO CONSTANT ON A LEAF NEVER BEFORE IMAGED.** `colcrop.py vol5 274` returns **1403 on a 56 px run** — a pinched run, and **the value was therefore not adopted on the default's own showing** even though it proved right. Thirteen windows: **one blows out** (70–89 % → 1261/**341 px**) and the **eleven** survivors run 15–35 % → 1399/64 · 20–40 % → 1399/64 · 25–45 % → 1399/64 · 30–50 % → 1401/60 · 35–55 % → 1403/60 · 40–60 % → 1403/60 · 45–65 % → 1404/62 · 50–70 % → 1405/63 · 55–75 % → 1404/63 · 60–80 % → 1405/60 · 65–85 % → 1404/57 — **a 6 px spread on runs of 57–64 px, drifting MONOTONICALLY UP the leaf**, which is page skew in the opposite direction from p. 273's and is not disagreement. Step 3 settles it: over rows 35–85 % the near-zero band runs **x = 1372–1432** and Quaracchi's printed column rule stands inside it at **x = 1398–1405, peaking 871 rows on x = 1403**. ★ **871 rows is by a wide margin the heaviest inking of the centre rule measured anywhere in Pars VI** (p. 273's was 382, p. 272's 220), and it is exactly why the default's run came back pinched at 56 px: **a narrow run is a reading of how heavily the rule printed, not of how wide the gutter is.** Band midpoint 1402, rule centre 1403, window consensus 1403 — **1403 adopted**, and the bands cut there read clean edge to edge in both columns.
- **★★ p. 275 = 1145, SETTLED FRESH, AND THE DEFAULT WAS REJECTED OUTRIGHT.** `colcrop.py vol5 275` returns **1127 on an 18 px run** — three px above the tool's own 15 px failure flag, and the loudest bad measurement seen in this pars. Thirteen windows fork cleanly in two: the **eight sound** upper windows run 15–35 % → 1156/62 · 20–40 % → 1156/61 · 25–45 % → 1155/60 · 30–50 % → 1154/61 · 35–55 % → 1152/60 · 40–60 % → 1151/60 · 45–65 % → 1148/59 · 50–70 % → 1147/59, again a **monotonic** drift (9 px) on runs of 59–62 px; the **four lower** windows collapse to 1123–1129 on runs of **23, 28, 27 and 26 px** and are discarded. Step 3 explains the fork and settles the value: over the full body rows the blank band runs **x ≈ 1119–1170** and the printed column rule stands inside it as a **skewed** ink island that moves from **x ≈ 1152–1158 in the upper body rows to x ≈ 1138–1150 in the lower**, peaking 372–447 rows — so in the lower rows the rule sits well right of centre, leaving only the left sub-band as a zero run and dragging the pinched windows onto it. **Band midpoint 1144.5, rule centre 1145.5 — 1145 adopted**, and the bands cut there read clean edge to edge in both columns. ★ **Three consecutive leaves, three different skews, and on p. 275 the skew is large enough that the drift alone is not a consensus — the body-band midpoint is what decides it, and is stated as such.**

**Apparatus source.** Vol V's IA OCR renders footnote numerals as punctuation glyphs — anchor POSITIONS survive in the raw, numbers and footer-entry openers do NOT. **All thirteen notes here were read off the 450 dpi footer bands** (6 bands at 2.6× for the body, then 14 bands at 4.6× for the digit and siglum work on each leaf); the counts are band-derived. `audit-apparatus-count` is blind to Vol V; `tools/check-vol5-apparatus.py` is the instrument. **p. 273's total of 7 was established by `bon-brev-p6-c8` and was already in `KNOWN_TOTALS`; p. 274's total of 8 and p. 275's total of 7 are both established here and entered**, with p. 275's nn. 5–7 forwarded as legitimate PENDINGs.

**★★ THE INCOMING HAND-OFF WAS RE-DERIVED IN FULL AND HELD IN EVERY PARTICULAR — INCLUDING THE DIGITS AND SIGLA IT EXPLICITLY DISCLAIMED.** `bon-brev-p6-c8` forwarded p. 273 from n. 7 onward and stated its verification level precisely: the BLOCK position, the VERBATIM TEXT, the ANCHOR COLUMN (RIGHT) and the anchor WORD of n. 7 all read off the bands, with every digit and siglum flagged unverified. Every clause of that is correct, and its narrative summary agrees with its per-note list; **nothing had to be withdrawn.** Verification level of every note as established **here**:
- **p. 273 n. 7** — POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified here against the hand-off, and the DIGITS and SIGLA settled independently (see below). Anchors on `super panem scilicet: Hoc est ⁷ corpus meum` in the **RIGHT** column, inside Cap. IX's *Thesis 1*. Footer entry **last** in p. 273's right block, complete, with the quire number `35` beneath it — which is what closes the p. 273 → p. 274 test from this side.
- **p. 274 nn. 1–5** — all first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: n. 1 anchors on `sanctissimum *corpus Christi* ¹.` closing the opening period; n. 2 on `*sapientia et sufficientia* sua ². —`; n. 3 on `sed *pura, placida* et *plenaria* ³;`; n. 4 on `« efficiat quod figurat ⁴ »;`; n. 5 on `usque ad finem mundi ⁵. —` — **all five in the LEFT column**, and their five footer entries fill the left block in order. n. 5 **breaks off mid-clause** at `…ut nos redimeret etc. —` and continues unnumbered at the head of the right block.
- **p. 274 nn. 6–8** — all first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: n. 6 anchors on `Refectio autem spiritus est verbum vitae ⁶,`; n. 7 on `propter horrorem cruditatis ⁷ et immortalitatem`; n. 8 on `in unum collectis ⁸: ideo sub his speciebus` — **all three in the RIGHT column**, their entries following n. 5's continuation in the right block, the last complete with blank paper beneath it.
- **p. 275 nn. 1–4** — all first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN and OWNERSHIP all verified: n. 1 anchors on `ut occupans locum, ut ¹ habens situm`; n. 2 on `fides illuminat ad recogitationem ²,`; n. 3 on `*iudicium sibi manducat et bibit* ³, quia tanto Sacramento`; n. 4 on `suscipientes percipiant ⁴ gratiae donum` — **all four in the LEFT column**, and their four footer entries fill the left block in order. n. 4 **breaks off mid-clause** at `…qui etiam inferius cum` and continues unnumbered at the head of the right block. ★ **n. 4 is the LAST note of Cap. IX and it is the note that straddles the gutter**, so p. 275's gutter test is mine and is logged here rather than forwarded.

**★ p. 273's SPLIT MAP — the leaf is now fully consumed.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 — n. 5 straddling the gutter. Right footer block: n. 5's unnumbered continuation, then nn. 6, 7. **Anchors:** nn. 1–4 in the LEFT column, nn. 5–7 in the RIGHT. **Total 7.** nn. 1–6 are Cap. VIII's (`p6-c8`'s), n. 7 is mine — as `p6-c8` established; re-read here from the far side and confirmed, block, anchor and capitulum break all falling in three different places exactly as its per-note list (not its neighbours) said.

**★★ p. 274's SPLIT MAP — THE BLOCK SPLIT AND THE ANCHOR SPLIT ARE BOTH 5/3 AND THEY COINCIDE, AND THERE IS NO CAPITULUM BREAK ON THE LEAF AT ALL.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 — n. 5 **straddling** the gutter. Right footer block: n. 5's unnumbered continuation, then nn. 6, 7, 8. **Anchors:** nn. 1–5 in the left column, nn. 6–8 in the right. **p. 274's TOTAL IS 8, established here and entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`; all eight are Cap. IX's.** ★ **This is the first leaf in Pars VI that no capitulum boundary touches — the sixth distinct arrangement in nine leaves, and the only one where the question "where does the capitulum break fall" has no answer.** p. 273's non-coincident 5/3-vs-4/3 did **not** propagate one leaf. **Read anchors, only anchors.**

**★★ p. 275's SPLIT MAP — THE BLOCK SPLIT IS 4/3, THE ANCHOR SPLIT IS 5/2, AND THE CAPITULUM BREAK FALLS BETWEEN THEM.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4 — n. 4 **straddling** the gutter. Right footer block: n. 4's unnumbered continuation, then nn. 5, 6, 7. **Anchors:** nn. 1–5 in the LEFT column (n. 5 anchors on Cap. X's `« secunda tabula post naufragium ⁵ »`, which is printed in the left column below the `CAP. X.` heading), nn. 6–7 in the RIGHT. **p. 275's TOTAL IS 7, established here and entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`**; nn. 1–4 are Cap. IX's (mine), nn. 5–7 are Cap. X's and are forwarded. ★ **So the block break falls at 4/3, the column break one note lower at 5/2, and the capitulum break at the block break but for a different reason — the seventh distinct arrangement in ten leaves, and the FIRST in this pars where the anchor split runs LOWER than the block split rather than higher.** Every previous leaf in Pars VI had the block break at or below the column break.

**★ SIGLA — SIX RUNS ACROSS THE THREE LEAVES, AND `I` IS ADMITTED THREE TIMES ON THE ONE-UPRIGHT RULE.**
1. **`E K` and `C I K L M O` (p. 273 n. 7)** — **the hand-off's two flagged runs, settled here off the plate at 4.6× and both confirmed.** `E` carries three horizontal bars on a single upright; `K` is unmistakable. In `C I K L M O` the second sort is a **single bare upright**, which is `I` by the one-upright rule and never `H`, and the run ascends C–I–K–L–M–O — the alphabetical order is the disambiguator, exactly as the frozen rule says. The raw prints `C I K L M 0`, its habitual `0` for `O`, and is otherwise right here.
2. **`B` (p. 274 n. 5's continuation)** — a single clean double-bowl sort. The raw prints `U`, one of its chronic letter corruptions.
3. **`B M` and `E P T W` (p. 275 n. 2)** — `B M` two unmistakable sorts; `E P T W` four ascending sorts, `W` the same doubled-V sort that stood on p. 273 n. 5 and p. 272 n. 4.
4. **`E` (p. 275 n. 1)** — a single sort, three bars on one upright.
5. **`I M V` (p. 275 n. 4)** — three sorts opening on a **single** upright, which is `I`; the ascent I–M–V confirms it, and it is the same run-shape as p. 273 n. 5's `I M O V`.
6. **`P` (p. 275 n. 4's continuation)** — a single sort, governing `transformentur`.
★ **No `H` anywhere in these three leaves' registers, and that is worth remarking rather than assuming**: every single upright met here resolved to `I`.

**Digits settled off the band, each with something independent agreeing** (per the frozen rule). ★ **The `1`/`4` class dominates these leaves — five of the seven decisions — reversing p. 273's footer, where the `3`/`5` class took four. Do not calibrate on the previous page.**
- **★ p. 274 n. 1's `Epist. I. Cor. 11, 29` — a `1`/`4` decision settled by the quoted text itself** (the tier-B channel of the index QA rule). The plate's two uprights are the flagged serif `1`s, and **the raw prints `Coi'. II, 29`, flattening them into a roman numeral**. **I Corinthians 11:29 is *qui enim manducat et bibit indigne, iudicium sibi manducat et bibit, non diiudicans corpus Domini*, which is word for word the clause its anchor sits on.** Decisive. The same citation recurs at p. 275 n. 3 and is settled the same way.
- **★ p. 274 n. 1's `IV. Sent. d. 8-13` — checked to EXIST and to match the subject, and it is this chapter's whole Vol IV precedent.** `bon-sent-IV-d8-*` through `bon-sent-IV-d13-*` exist as sixty-odd chunks and **are the eucharist** ✓ — d.8 the institution and the form, d.9 sacramental and spiritual manducation, d.10 the mode of Christ's presence, d.11 the conversion and the accidents, d.12 the species, d.13 the minister. The `13` is flat-topped with a single bowl (`3`, not `5`); `d. 8-15` would run past the eucharist into d.14's penance, which the note's own `De eucharistia agitur` forbids. The raw prints `d. 8-1.)` and is worthless.
- **★ p. 274 n. 8's `in Ioan. Evang. tr. 26. n. 17` — a `1`/`4` decision settled by an external fact.** The plate prints a flagged upright before the `7`; **the raw agrees at `n. 17`** but the sort reads as `47` at first glance. **Augustine's *Tractatus in Ioannem* 26 has twenty sections, so `n. 47` cannot exist**; and tr. 26 n. 17 is the *unus panis… de multis granis… vinum de multis acinis* passage, which is verbatim what the anchor's `panis factus de mundissimis granis et vinum expressum de purissimis acinis in unum collectis` is drawn from ✓. Decisive twice over.
- **★ p. 275 n. 2's `IV. Sent. d. 9. a. 1. q. 2.` — a `1`/`4` decision settled by the structure of the target itself, and the target checked to EXIST.** The sort after `a.` prints as a flagged upright that reads `4` at a glance, and the raw reproduces it ambiguously. **Vol IV d. 9 has exactly TWO articles** (`bon-sent-IV-d9-a1-q1…q4` and `-a2-q1…q4`), **so `a. 4.` cannot exist** — the reading is `a. 1.` ✓. And `IV-d9-a1-q2` is *Quid sit manducare sacramentaliter*, inside the article *De duplici modo manducandi eucharistiam* — which is precisely the sacramental-vs-spiritual eating this note's *recognitio / recogitatio / recordatio* variant turns on ✓.
- **p. 274 n. 5's `Matth. 28, 20` and `Tit. 2, 14`** — both confirmed by their own quoted words, which the note prints: Matthew 28:20 *ecce ego vobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi* against the anchor's `nobiscum existit usque ad finem mundi` ✓; Titus 2:14 *qui dedit semetipsum pro nobis ut nos redimeret* against `se pro nobis obtulit` ✓. The raw prints `Tit. 2, I i` and mangles the second.
- **p. 274 n. 6's `Ioan. 6, 69`** — confirmed by subject: Vulgate John 6:69 is *Domine, ad quem ibimus? verba vitae aeternae habes*, which is exactly the `Refectio autem spiritus est verbum vitae` its anchor sits on ✓. Both witnesses agree on the digits.
- **p. 274 n. 3's `Hebr. 9, 10`** — confirmed by subject: Hebrews 9:9–10 is the passage on the old *munera et hostiae* that cannot perfect the conscience, *usque ad tempus correctionis impositis*, which is what the anchor's `tempus gratiae revelatae requirit, quod iam non offeratur oblatio qualiscumque` is opposing ✓. The raw reproduces it correctly.
- **p. 274 n. 7's `d. XI. c. 3.` and n. 8's `d. VIII. c. 7.`** — roman numerals in full serif, not digit sorts, and both are Lombard's own chapter divisions in the eucharistic distinctions; the `3` and `7` sit in no confusion class. The raw prints `d. .\I. c. 3.`, shattering the roman numeral only.

**⚠ TWO `[?]` FLAGS TRAVEL FORWARD, NEITHER RESOLVED, NEITHER RE-FLAGGED, AND NO NEW ONE IS RAISED HERE.**
1. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 271 n. 2, `E F G H minus, aptae ponunt et`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c6`, whose entry carries it; `p6-c6` flagged it, `p6-c7` re-examined it and recorded **no disposition**, `p6-c8` left it untouched). **p. 271 is off this chunk's leaves entirely, nothing read here bears on it, and it is neither resolved nor re-flagged.** It stands as `p6-c6` left it and is forwarded to `p6-c10` unchanged.
2. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 272 n. 6, `Respicitur Col. 6, 12.`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c7`, whose entry carries it; the plate confirmed by `p6-c7` and again by `p6-c8` at 4.6×, with no disposition recorded either time). **p. 272 is off this chunk's leaves entirely and nothing read here bears on it either.** Colossians still has four chapters and the sense still requires Ephes. 6:12; **no disposition is recorded, it is neither resolved nor re-flagged as new**, and `build-citations.py`'s QA line on it remains expected behaviour, not a defect. Forwarded to `p6-c10`.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order): p. 273 right column — "Thesis 1." — "Thesis 2." — "Thesis 3"; p. 274 left column — "Ratio." — "Arguitur ex sufficientia pro thesi 1." — "Triplex effectus." — "Triplex modus eucharistiae." — "Item, ex sapientia." — "Triplex congruentia." — "Prima requirit tria." — "Primum." — "Secundum."; p. 274 right column — "Tertium." — "Secunda congruentia requirit velamen congruum." — "Pro thesi 2."; p. 275 left column — "Tertia congruentia." — "Pro thesi 3." — "De indigne communicantibus." — "Corollarium." ★ **Nineteen glosses — by a wide margin the densest register in Pars VI, and a THIRD distinct form again.** Cap. IX sets three theses and a *Ratio* like Cap. VIII, but where Cap. VIII let the answering series decay to nothing, Cap. IX **restores the one-to-one `Pro thesi` series in full** (`Arguitur ex sufficientia pro thesi 1.`, `Pro thesi 2.`, `Pro thesi 3.`) and then hangs a whole second, independent enumerative apparatus beside it — a *triplex effectus / triplex modus / triplex congruentia* skeleton with its own `Prima requirit tria.` and `Primum. / Secundum. / Tertium.` sub-series, plus `Secunda congruentia…` and `Tertia congruentia.`, closing on a `Corollarium.` that no previous chapter in this pars has used. **Two answering series running in parallel is a shape not seen before; it is the fifth consecutive chapter with a different gloss form, and nothing was inferred from any neighbour in advance.** Glosses stand in the outer margin of each column — left of column 1, right of column 2 — and the raw's rendering (`Arcuitar cx &iijticienlia pro tbe*`, `Tcrii,i con-^Tucnlia`, `coromani-caniibns`, `coroiiarinm`, `secuniT reqmrlt"e* gruum.^ °'`) is unusable; all nineteen are band reads.

**★ THE PRINTER'S SIGNATURE IS NOT DUE ON THESE LEAVES AND DOES NOT APPEAR.** p. 273 carried `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` with quire `35` (logged by `p6-c8`); the eight-leaf cadence puts the next around p. 281, which is also where Pars VII opens. **Neither p. 274 nor p. 275 carries a signature line, and their footer blocks end in blank paper** — which is part of what closes both page-crossing tests from the upper side.

**Raw-quality grade, per page and per region** (the raw was a cross-check only, never the base): **p. 273 body (right column, the Cap. IX portion) — good**, continuously readable with the usual ligature damage (`Dc intcf/ritate cuchariMicui.`, `euchariitiac`, `signifieatur`, `sac«rdotal(!in`, `tr.anssubstantiatiir`, `lesn Christi`) — a better grade than `p6-c7`/`p6-c8` gave that leaf's left column, so **p. 273's two columns grade differently for a second reader in the same direction**. **p. 273 footer (n. 7 only) — good**, the one entry it reproduces substantially right. **p. 274 body — the best raw of the three leaves in both columns**, with damage confined to single letters (`relicitur`, `maiubical`, `sulficicnlissimum`, `diarismata`, `dikctionis`, `pro\iinuin`, `tiinc est` for *hinc est*, `irnic est` for the same, `noa` for *non*, `JjuUa` for *nulla*, `deiifibus`, `iihil`); **p. 274 footer — wrong in two digits and one siglum** (`Coi'. II, 29`, `d. 8-1.)`, `Tit. 2, I i`, `diffundcns U` for `B`), while reproducing nn. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 right — **grade per block, not per page.** **p. 275 body — the worst of the three**, degrading sharply in the left column below the `Postremo` paragraph (`L'st in lota spcoie`, `(iiiod iii (|ii;ilili('t ciiis part(j`, `iM!r lioc non osl ibi`, `1'ropter (puNl eliam`, `liahent omiKMn`, `ciijjacilaii no.slra`, `efllcaciter`, `idso ad lioc`, `mdicimn, siln nmnducal`, `conricicntes`, `perficiantnr`) — **so on this leaf the grade moves WITHIN a single column, top to bottom, which is the third distinct within-page pattern the rule names.** **p. 275 footer — surprisingly clean**, its worst being the same flagged-upright ambiguities the plate itself carries.

**Runover tests — FOUR RUN, TWO POSITIVE, TWO NEGATIVE; all four closed from BOTH sides.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 273 → p. 274 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 273's right block ends **complete** at n. 7's `…Vat., 1 et 3 addunt *nec localiter*.`, with the quire number `35` and then blank paper beneath it, and **p. 274's left block opens NUMBERED** at `¹ Epist. I. Cor. 11, 29.`
- *p. 274's own gutter — **POSITIVE**, and logged as `p.274 n.5:gutter`.* The left block's last entry, n. 5, **breaks off mid-sentence at a scriptural quotation's `etc.` and an em-dash** — `…Qui dedit semetipsum pro nobis, ut nos redimeret etc. —` — and **p. 274's right block opens UNNUMBERED** with `Pro *ad finem* plures codd. *in finem*. Superius pro *diffundens* B melius *infundens*.` Rendered joined in the `p274-5` entry. ★ **The break falls on the em-dash that separates the scriptural citations from the variant readings, so both halves read as complete units on their own** — precisely the shape the frozen rule warns is not evidence of an ending.
- *Page-crossing, p. 274 → p. 275 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 274's right block ends **complete** at n. 8's `…cum uno alteroque cod. *in qua*.`, with blank paper beneath it, and **p. 275's left block opens NUMBERED** at `¹ Edd., excepta 2, *vel*.`
- *p. 275's own gutter — **POSITIVE**, and logged as `p.275 n.4:gutter`.* The left block's last entry, n. 4, **breaks off mid-clause at a relative pronoun governing nothing** — `…qui etiam inferius cum` — and **p. 275's right block opens UNNUMBERED** with `nonnullis aliis codd. pro *excessivum* substituunt *excellentissimum*…`, the preposition `cum` stranded from its object across the gutter. Rendered joined in the `p275-4` entry. ★ **The straddling note is Cap. IX's own — the last note of the chapter — so the test is closed and logged here rather than forwarded**, even though the notes immediately below it in the same block belong to Cap. X.
- *NOT re-logged here:* **`p.273 n.5:gutter` (`p6-c8`, POSITIVE) and the p. 272 → p. 273 page-crossing test (`p6-c8`, NEGATIVE)**; `p.272 n.5:gutter` and the p. 271 → p. 272 test (both `p6-c7`); `p.270 n.4:gutter`, the p. 270 → p. 271 test and p. 271's own gutter test (all three `p6-c6`); `p.269 n.4:gutter` and the p. 269 → p. 270 test (both `p6-c5`); `p.268 n.4:gutter` and the p. 268 → p. 269 test (both `p6-c4`); `p.267 n.4:gutter` and the p. 267 → p. 268 test (both `p6-c3`); `p.266 n.3:gutter` and the p. 266 → p. 267 test (both `p6-c2`); p. 265's own gutter test and the p. 265 → p. 266 test (both `p6-c1`); the p. 264 → p. 265 test, p. 264's own gutter test and the p. 263 → p. 264 test (all `p5-c10`); and everything on `p6-c1`'s through `p6-c8`'s own do-not-re-log lists. Corpus-wide runover and chunk totals are **not written here** — derive them with `tools/check-vol5-census.py`.

**★ WHAT THIS CHUNK FORWARDS TO `bon-brev-p6-c10`.** p. 273 and p. 274 are **fully consumed** — p. 273's seven notes and p. 274's eight, nothing left on either. **p. 275's register was band-read IN FULL and its total of 7 is entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`**; this chunk owns nn. 1–4, and **nn. 5, 6 and 7 anchor in Cap. X and are `p6-c10`'s.** Stated with its verification level, claiming nothing more: **the BLOCK position, the VERBATIM TEXT, the ANCHOR COLUMN and the anchor WORD of n. 5 were all read off the bands** (`« secunda tabula post naufragium ⁵ »`, in Cap. X's *Thesis 1*, in the **LEFT** column below the `CAP. X.` heading); **for nn. 6 and 7 the BLOCK position and the VERBATIM TEXT were read off the bands, and their anchors were NOT located — they fall somewhere in p. 275's RIGHT column, which was not set here, and their COLUMN is inferred from that fact alone.**
- n. **5** `Hieron., Epist. 130. (alias 8.) n. 9.`
- n. **6** `De Sacramento poenitentiae agitur IV. Sent. d. 14-22. — Pro *habet* A *habent*; voci *episcopo* F praefigit *solo*, qui etiam superius cum pluribus aliis codd. pro *reunitur* substituit *restituitur*, K R et 2 *remittitur*.`
- n. **7** `A addit *tantum*, Vat., 1 et 3 *solum*; P autem subiungit *tantum* post *bis*. Inferius pro *vertibilis* edd., excepta 2, *convertibilis*.`
★ **EVERY DIGIT AND SIGLUM IN nn. 5–7 IS UNVERIFIED**, notwithstanding that they were read carefully off a 4.6× band: `Epist. 130. (alias 8.)` and `d. 14-22.` both sit in the `1`/`4` class that dominated these three leaves, `n. 9` is a lone digit with nothing agreeing with it yet, and `K R` is the chronic raw-corruption pair. **Re-derive all of it. A hand-off is a claim to re-derive, never a fact to adopt** — and check the narrative summary above against the per-note list it sits beside, never the reverse. `bon-brev-p6-c10` owns p. 275 from n. 5 onward, **must NOT re-log p. 275's own gutter test (closed POSITIVE and logged here as `p.275 n.4:gutter`) nor the p. 274 → p. 275 test (closed NEGATIVE here)**, owes **the p. 275 → p. 276 page-crossing test and p. 276's own gutter test** (and the same pair for p. 277 if the span reaches it), and must extract p. 276 fresh with no constant. Cap. X (`De integritate poenitentiae`) opens ~65 % down p. 275's **LEFT** column with a ONE-line subtitle and a `Thesis 1.` gloss, and **its first two thirds of a column are followed by its whole right column**; **its end must be set from the `Cap. XI.` heading on the band and from nothing else** — the index gives Cap. XI's opening as p. 276, i.e. Cap. X runs one and a bit printed pages on the index's own showing, **which is a hypothesis and not a span, and the index has now under-reported Cap. IX's span by a whole leaf.** **Both `[?]` flags travel forward unresolved: p. 271 n. 2's `minus, aptae` and p. 272 n. 6's `Col. 6, 12`.**

**Register — the eucharistic vocabulary was CONSULTED from the Vol IV settlement, not coined here, and Pars VI's own vocabulary was FOLLOWED, not re-decided.** `p6-c1`'s sacramental core, `p6-c2`'s historical-dispensation vocabulary, `p6-c3`'s seven sacrament names, `p6-c4`'s institution vocabulary, `p6-c5`'s dispensation-and-minister vocabulary, `p6-c6`'s iteration-and-character vocabulary, `p6-c7`'s *integritas* vocabulary and `p6-c8`'s *integer / placida / intrepida* settlement all stand unchanged. **Vol IV chunks consulted for this chapter — d.8 through d.13, which is the eucharist and which p. 274 n. 1 names as such (*De eucharistia agitur IV. Sent. d. 8-13*):** `bon-sent-IV-d8-p1-divisio`, `bon-sent-IV-d8-p1-littera`, `bon-sent-IV-d8-p1-a2-q1` and `-a2-q2` (the *viaticum* triad), `bon-sent-IV-d8-p2-a1-q1` and `-a1-q2` (the form of consecration and the *transsubstantiatio*), `bon-sent-IV-d8-p2-a2-q1` (*Quid in eucharistia sit res, et quid Sacramentum* — where Lombard's *Sacramentum tantum / res et Sacramentum / res tantum* is set out and where *species visibilis*, *corpus Christi verum* and *corpus Christi mysticum* are fixed), `bon-sent-IV-d8-p2-a2-q2`, `bon-sent-IV-d9-divisio`, `bon-sent-IV-d9-a1-q1` (*De duplici modo manducandi eucharistiam*), `bon-sent-IV-d9-a1-q2` (*Quid sit manducare sacramentaliter* — the target of p. 275 n. 2), `bon-sent-IV-d9-a1-q4` (*Quid sit manducare spiritualiter*), `bon-sent-IV-d9-a2-q1`–`q2` (the unworthy receiver), `bon-sent-IV-d10-p1-a1-q1`–`q2` (the mode of containment and the conversion), `bon-sent-IV-d11-p1-a1-q1`–`q2` (the accidents without a subject) and `bon-sent-IV-d12-p1-a1-q1` (the species and their operation). **Carried from that settlement, not re-decided:** *transsubstantiatio / transsubstantiatur* → "transubstantiation / is transubstantiated"; *conversio substantiae* → "conversion of the substance"; *species* → "species" throughout, never "appearances"; *accidentia praeter subiectum* → "accidents without a subject" (Vol IV's own phrase, so the `licet sint praeter subiectum` clause here answers the Vol IV questions rather than drifting from them); *corpus verum / corpus mysticum* → "true body / mystical body"; *manducare sacramentaliter / spiritualiter* → "to eat sacramentally / spiritually" and *sumere* → "to receive"; *viaticum* left untranslated as "viaticum" (Vol IV never Englishes it); *res et Sacramentum* left in Latin where it is a technical triad-member; *panis / vinum* → "bread / wine"; *consecratio* → "consecration" with *consecratio sacerdotalis* → "the priestly consecration"; *forma vocalis* → "the vocal form" and *prolatio* → "utterance" (both from `p6-c7`, and the same words recur here). **Fixed here for the rest of the per-sacrament run:** *totaliter / circumscriptibiliter / sacramentaliter* → "totally / circumscriptibly / sacramentally", the three kept as a triad of adverbs so Bonaventure's contrast survives; *refectio / reficere* → "refection / to refresh" against *cibus* → "food" and *esus* → "eating"; *recogitatio* → "recollection" (with the apparatus variants *recognitio* and *recordatio* left in Latin italics so the three-way variant is not flattened); *charismata gratiarum* → "the charisms of graces"; *cruditas* → "rawness" (the note's own variant *crudelitas* left in Latin, since the two readings are the point); *velamen aenigmatis* → "the veil of the enigma"; *acini* → "berries"; *contumeliam facere* → "to do an outrage" (answering `p6-c6`'s *contumelia Sacramento*); *excessivus amor* → "excessive love" (kept literal against the variant *excellentissimus*, which the apparatus records). Quaracchi's em-dash articulations are preserved throughout, and Bonaventure's *quia/cum/ideo* chains are kept as one English sentence — the *Ratio* period, the *Quia vero* period and the *Rursus* period each run as a single sentence, and the *Quia vero corpus Christi* period runs as one sentence across the p. 274 → p. 275 page break.

method: LLM-assisted translation from the Quaracchi Latin, verified chunk-by-chunk against the printed plates (apparatus roster, cross-references, page/gutter boundaries).

license_source: Public Domain Mark 1.0

license_translation: CC BY-NC 4.0

license_apparatus: CC BY-NC 4.0