title: Pars 7, Cap. 5

source_text:
<!-- page 286 -->

### Capitulum V. *De concomitantibus iudicium, sicut est resurrectio corporum.*

De resurrectione autem corporum hoc tenendum est, quod omnium corpora hominum in generali resurrectione resurgent, nulla in eis existente distantia quantum ad ordinem temporis, sed magna quantum ad ordinem dignitatis. — Nam mali surgent cum suis deformitatibus et poenalitatibus, miseriis et defectibus, quos habuerunt in statu viae. In bonis autem « natura servabitur, et vitia detrahentur[^p286-2] », et omnes resurgent integro corpore et plena aetate et debita mensura membrorum; ut sic omnes Sancti occurrant *in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi*. — Surgent autem tam in bonis quam in malis corpora eadem numero, quae prius et ex eisdem partibus constituta, salva totius veritate naturae non solum quantum ad membra principalia et humiditatem radicalem, verum etiam salvis capillis[^p286-3] et ceteris membris, quae faciunt ad decentiam corporis; ita quod « in quascumque auras vel sinus naturae pulvis humani corporis cedat, ad eam animam redibit, quae ipsum primitus, ut viveret et cresceret, animavit ».

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia primum principium, eo ipso quod primum et summum, est *universalissimum* et *sufficientissimum*, ac per hoc principium est naturarum, gratiarum et praemiorum, principium etiam *potentissimum*, *clementissimum* et *iustissimum*; et licet secundum quandam *appropriationem*[^p286-4] sit *potentissimum* in constitutione naturarum et *clementissimum* in collatione gratiarum et *iustissimum* in retributione stipendiorum; tamen singula sunt in singulis, quia summa potentia, clementia et iustitia nullatenus possunt ab invicem separari. Et ideo in opere retributionis necesse est quod ipsa fiat, secundum quod exigit *rectitudo iustitiae* et *reformatio gratiae* et *completio naturae*. Quoniam ergo *iustitia* necessario requirit, ut homo, qui meruit vel demeruit non in anima solum nec in corpore solum, sed in anima simul et corpore, puniatur vel praemietur in utroque; *reformatio* etiam *gratiae* requirit, ut totum corpus assimiletur Christo capiti, cuius corpus mortuum necessarium fuit resurgere, cum unitum esset inseparabiliter Divinitati; *completio* vero *naturae* requirit, ut homo constet simul ex corpore et anima tanquam ex materia et forma, quae mutuum habent appetitum et inclinationem mutuam[^p286-5]: necesse est, resurrectionem esse futuram, exigente hoc *constitutione naturae*, *infusione gratiae* et *retributione iustitiae*, secundum quas tota universitas habet regi. Et ideo ex his tribus omnia clamant hominem resuscitandum, ut omnis tollatur excusatio illis qui contra hanc veritatem fidei obsurdescunt, et merito contra tales universus *pugnet orbis terrarum*[^p286-6].

Primo igitur, quoniam resurrectio debet esse secundum exigentiam ordinis *divinae iustitiae*; et divina iustitia reddit unicuique quod suum est pro loco et tempore; et omnis anima corpori semel[^p286-7] et ad punctum temporis unita vel habet in eo *culpam*, vel *gratiam*: necesse est, quod omnes resurgant. — Et quia distinctus debet esse status retributionis a statu viae, et resurrectio spectat ad statum retributionis; ut non confundatur ordo universi, et ut fides habeat meritum, quae credit quod non videt, et ut certius et clarius appareat aequitas divinae iustitiae, et ut simul fiat consummatio et retributio finalis in Angelis et hominibus: requirit hoc divina iustitia, ut omnes resurgant *simul*, quantum est de lege communi. Quod dico propter Christum et eius beatissimam matrem, gloriosam Virginem Mariam. — Quia vero malis debetur poena et miseria et bonis gloria; ideo, etsi simul resurgant in tempore, valde tamen *dissimiles* erunt in conditione. Nam quia malis resurrectio non est ad vitam, sed ad supplicium[^p286-8]; necesse est, quod ipsi cum infirmitatibus, deformitatibus et defectibus suscitentur.

Rursus, quia resurrectio debet esse secundum exigentiam *consummationis gratiae*; et perfecta gratia facit nos conformes Christo, capiti nostro, in quo nullus fuit defectus membrorum, sed perfecta aetas et statura debita et effigies formosa: opportunum est, quod boni suscitentur in optimis conditionibus; ac per hoc necesse est, quod in eis vitia detrahan-
<!-- page 287 -->
tur, et natura servetur. — Opportunum etiam est, ut, si aliquod membrum deerat, suppleatur; si aliqua erat superfluitas, auferatur; si aliqua membrorum deordinatio, corrigatur; si parvulus erat, ad quantitatem aetatis Christi, quam habebat in resurrectione, licet « non in mole[^p287-1] », divina virtute deducatur; si decrepitus, ad eandem aetatem reducatur; si gigas, si nanus, ad mensuram congruam limitetur; ut sic omnes integri et perfecti occurrant *in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi*.

Postremo, quia resurrectio debet esse secundum exigentiam *perfectionis naturae*; et natura spiritus rationalis exigit, quod vivificet corpus proprium, quia « proprius actus in propria materia habet fieri[^p287-2] »: necesse est, quod idem corpus numero resurgat, alioquin non esset resurrectio vera. Requirit etiam natura animae rationalis et immortalis, quod sicut habet *esse* perpetuum, sic corpus habeat, cui perpetuo influat vitam; ac per hoc corpus, quod animae unitur, ex ipsa unione ordinationem habet ad incorruptionem perpetuam, ita tamen, quod illud, in quo consistit substantia totius corporis, sicut sunt membra principalia et etiam humiditas radicalis et caro *secundum speciem*, habeat ordinationem *necessariam*; alia vero, scilicet caro *secundum materiam*[^p287-3] et partes, quae sunt de *bene esse* corporis, habeant ordinationem *de congruo*: et ideo primae partes sunt ordinatae ad resurrectionem secundum ordinem *necessitatis*, aliae vero omnes secundum ordinem *congruitatis*. Quem quidem ordinem quia Deus impressit naturae; et natura non potest perficere, quia non potest mortuum suscitare; et ipsa divina providentia nihil debuit facere frustra[^p287-4]: necesse est, quod ipsius virtute reparetur corpus *idem numero* et *immortale* et *ex omnibus partibus constitutum*, et salva tota veritate naturae. — Cum autem haec natura non habeat in *potestate*, sed solum in *appetitu*, quia nec *idem* corpus numero destructum reparare potest, cum non possit in totam rei substantiam, nec corpus *immortale* possit efficere, cum omne per naturam generabile sit corruptibile[^p287-5], nec *dispersa* colligere: necesse est, quod resurrectio non *seminalibus* nec *naturalibus* causis, sed *primordialibus* attribuatur, ut fiat secundum cursum mirabilem et supernaturalem et divinae imperium voluntatis.

---

english:
### Chapter V. *On the things concomitant with the judgment, of which sort is the resurrection of bodies.*

Now concerning the resurrection of bodies this must be held: that the bodies of all men will rise again in the general resurrection, no distance existing among them as regards the order of time, but a great one as regards the order of dignity. — For the evil will rise with their deformities and penalties, miseries and defects, which they had in the state of the way. But in the good « nature will be preserved, and the vices taken away[^p286-2] », and all will rise with an entire body and full age and the due measure of their members; so that thus all the Saints may meet *unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ*. — Now there will rise, in the good as in the evil, bodies the same in number as before and constituted out of the same parts, the whole truth of nature being preserved, not only as regards the principal members and the radical moisture, but also with the hair preserved[^p286-3] and the other members which make for the seemliness of the body; so that « into whatever breezes or recesses of nature the dust of the human body may pass, it will return to that soul which first animated it, that it might live and grow ».

Now the reason for the understanding of the aforesaid is this: since the first principle, by that very fact that it is first and highest, is *most universal* and *most sufficient*, and through this is the principle of natures, of graces and of rewards, a principle also *most powerful*, *most clement* and *most just*; and although by a certain *appropriation*[^p286-4] it is *most powerful* in the constituting of natures and *most clement* in the conferring of graces and *most just* in the retribution of wages, nevertheless the several belong to the several, because supreme power, clemency and justice can in no way be separated from one another. And therefore in the work of retribution it is necessary that it come about according as the *rectitude of justice* and the *reformation of grace* and the *completion of nature* require. Since therefore *justice* necessarily requires that man, who merited or demerited not in the soul alone nor in the body alone, but in soul and body together, be punished or rewarded in both; and the *reformation* also *of grace* requires that the whole body be made like to Christ our head, whose dead body had necessarily to rise, since it was inseparably united to the Divinity; and the *completion* indeed *of nature* requires that man consist at once of body and soul as of matter and form, which have a mutual appetite and a mutual inclination[^p286-5]: it is necessary that the resurrection be to come, this being required by the *constitution of nature*, the *infusion of grace* and the *retribution of justice*, according to which the whole universe has to be governed. And therefore out of these three all things cry out that man is to be raised up, so that every excuse may be taken away from those who are deaf against this truth of faith, and that deservedly against such men *the whole world may fight*[^p286-6].

First, therefore, since the resurrection must be according to the requirement of the order of *divine justice*; and divine justice renders to each what is his own according to place and time; and every soul once[^p286-7] united to a body and at a point of time either has in it *fault* or *grace*: it is necessary that all rise again. — And because the state of retribution must be distinct from the state of the way, and the resurrection regards the state of retribution; so that the order of the universe be not confounded, and that faith may have merit, which believes what it does not see, and that the equity of divine justice may appear more certainly and more clearly, and that the consummation and final retribution in Angels and in men may come about together: divine justice requires this, that all rise *together*, as far as the common law goes. And I say this on account of Christ and his most blessed mother, the glorious Virgin Mary. — But because punishment and misery are owed to the evil and glory to the good, therefore, even if they rise together in time, yet they will be very *unlike* in condition. For because for the evil the resurrection is not unto life but unto punishment[^p286-8], it is necessary that they be raised up with infirmities, deformities and defects.

Again, since the resurrection must be according to the requirement of the *consummation of grace*; and perfect grace makes us conformed to Christ, our head, in whom there was no defect of members, but a perfect age and due stature and a comely figure: it is fitting that the good be raised up in the best conditions; and through this it is necessary that in them the vices be taken away,
<!-- page 287 -->
and nature preserved. — It is fitting also that, if any member was lacking, it be supplied; if there was any superfluity, it be removed; if there was any disorder of the members, it be corrected; if he was a little child, that he be brought by divine power to the quantity of the age of Christ, which he had at his resurrection — though « not in bulk[^p287-1] »; if decrepit, that he be brought back to the same age; if a giant, if a dwarf, that he be limited to a fitting measure; so that thus all may meet whole and perfect *unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ*.

Lastly, since the resurrection must be according to the requirement of the *perfection of nature*; and the nature of the rational spirit requires that it give life to its own body, because « the proper act has to come about in its proper matter[^p287-2] »: it is necessary that the same body rise again in number, otherwise it would not be a true resurrection. The nature also of the rational and immortal soul requires that, just as it has perpetual *being*, so it have a body into which it may perpetually pour life; and through this the body, which is united to the soul, has from that very union an ordering toward perpetual incorruption — yet in such wise that that in which the substance of the whole body consists, such as are the principal members and also the radical moisture and the flesh *according to species*, has a *necessary* ordering; but the rest, namely the flesh *according to matter*[^p287-3] and the parts which are of the *well-being* of the body, have an ordering *of fittingness*: and therefore the first parts are ordered to the resurrection according to the order of *necessity*, but all the others according to the order of *fittingness*. And since God impressed this order upon nature; and nature cannot bring it to completion, because it cannot raise the dead; and divine providence itself ought to have made nothing in vain[^p287-4]: it is necessary that by his power the body be repaired *the same in number* and *immortal* and *constituted out of all its parts*, and with the whole truth of nature preserved. — But since this nature does not have this in its *power*, but only in its *appetite*, because it can neither repair the same body in number once destroyed, since it cannot reach to the whole substance of the thing, nor can it make a body *immortal*, since everything generable by nature is corruptible[^p287-5], nor can it gather what is *dispersed*: it is necessary that the resurrection be attributed not to *seminal* nor to *natural* causes, but to *primordial* ones, so that it come about according to a wondrous and supernatural course and the command of the divine will.

---

la: August., XXII. de Civ. Dei, c. 17. — Seq. locus est Eph. 4, 13. — Superius Vat., 1 et 3 cum pluribus codd. pro *magna* substituunt *magis*, et cum aliquot codd. bis *ordinationem* ante *temporis* et *dignitatis* pro *ordinem*.

en: Augustine, *On the City of God* XXII, c. 17. — The following passage is Ephesians 4:13. — Above, the Vatican edition, 1 and 3, with several codices, substitute *magis* for *magna*, and with some codices twice read *ordinationem* before *temporis* and *dignitatis* in place of *ordinem*.

la: Luc. 21, 18: Et capillus de capite vestro non peribit. — Seq. sententia est August., Enchirid. c. 88. n. 23. — De hoc cap. vide IV. Sent. d. 43. a. 1. et d. 44. p. I. per totam.

en: Luke 21:18: *And a hair of your head shall not perish.* — The following sentence is Augustine, *Enchiridion* c. 88, n. 23. — On this chapter see IV *Sent.* d. 43, a. 1, and d. 44, part I, in its entirety.

la: Cfr. supra p. I. c. 6. — Inferius pro *stipendiorum* I K L O P V *praemiorum*, D *praemiorum vel stipendiorum*, et post *tamen* edd., excepta 2, addunt *singillatim*.

en: Cf. above, part I, c. 6. — Below, for *stipendiorum* I K L O P V read *praemiorum*, D *praemiorum vel stipendiorum*, and after *tamen* the editions, edition 2 excepted, add *singillatim*.

la: Vide Aristot., I. Phys. text. 81. (c. 9.), et August., XII. de Gen. ad lit. c. 35. n. 68. — Superius pro *reformatio etiam* edd. *reformatio autem*, I M *reformatio autem gratiae etiam*, alii similiter, sed omittentes *autem*.

en: See Aristotle, *Physics* I, text 81 (c. 9), and Augustine, *On Genesis according to the letter* XII, c. 35, n. 68. — Above, for *reformatio etiam* the editions read *reformatio autem*, I M *reformatio autem gratiae etiam*, the others similarly, but omitting *autem*.

la: Sap. 5, 21: Et pugnabit cum illo orbis terrarum contra insensatos.

en: Wisdom 5:21: *And the whole world shall fight with him against the unwise.*

la: F I K L O U V *simul*.

en: F I K L O U V read *simul*.

la: Ioan. 5, 29: Et procedent qui bona fecerunt in resurrectionem vitae, qui vero mala egerunt, in resurrectionem iudicii.

en: John 5:29: *And they that have done good things shall come forth unto the resurrection of life; but they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of judgment.*

la: Ut ait August. XXII. de Civ. Dei, c. 14. — Plures codd. et 2 *non mole*. Inferius verbo *limitetur* K praefigit *reducatur vel*.

en: As Augustine says, *On the City of God* XXII, c. 14. — Several codices and edition 2 read *non mole*. Below, K prefixes *reducatur vel* to the word *limitetur*.

la: Aristot., II. de Anima, text. 26. (c. 2.). — Inferius post *ordinationem* pro *habet* K P et 1 *habeat*.

en: Aristotle, *On the Soul* II, text 26 (c. 2). — Below, after *ordinationem*, in place of *habet* K P and edition 1 read *habeat*.

la: De hac Aristotelica distinctione carnis cfr. tom. II. pag. 734, nota 3. — Superius pro *substantia totius corporis* I K L U *natura totius corporis*.

en: On this Aristotelian distinction of flesh cf. vol. II, p. 734, note 3. — Above, for *substantia totius corporis* I K L U read *natura totius corporis*.

la: Cfr. supra pag. 271, nota 8. — Quod idem numero corpus destructum reparari non possit a natura, docet Aristot.; cfr. tom. IV. pag. 888, nota 2. — Inferius voci *naturae* Vat., 1 et 3 praefigunt *humanae*.

en: Cf. above, p. 271, note 8. — That a body the same in number, once destroyed, cannot be repaired by nature, Aristotle teaches; cf. vol. IV, p. 888, note 2. — Below, the Vatican edition, 1 and 3, prefix *humanae* to the word *naturae*.

la: Vide supra pag. 227, nota 2. — De causis seminalibus etc. vide II. Sent. d. 18. a. 1. q. 2. in corp., ex qua quaedam supra pag. 216, nota 3. — Post *seminalibus* P addit *rationibus*.

en: See above, p. 227, note 2. — On the seminal causes etc. see II *Sent.* d. 18, a. 1, q. 2, in the body, from which certain things [were adduced] above, p. 216, note 3. — After *seminalibus* P adds *rationibus*. ---

translators_notes:
**★★ PAGE SPAN — pp. 286–287, TWO LEAVES, AND THE CLOSE IS FIXED POSITIVELY FROM THE `Cap. VI.` HEADING ON THE PLATE.** `Cap. V.` stands centred in p. 286's **LEFT** column at about **20 %** of the leaf, with a **TWO-line** subtitle `De concomitantibus iudicium, sicut est / resurrectio corporum.`, immediately below Cap. IV's close `…possunt dici omnia innovari et quodam modo praemiari.` — heading, subtitle and opening period all re-set here word by word off the band rather than adopted from the hand-off, which had read the opening only as far as `in generali re-`. The capitulum fills the rest of p. 286's left column and breaks to that leaf's right column **at a paragraph boundary** (`…et completio naturae.` / `Quoniam ergo iustitia necessario requirit`) — the first break of this pars to fall on so clean a seam, and it proves nothing; runs p. 286's right column to the foot and breaks to p. 287 **MID-WORD** (`quod in eis vitia detrahan-` / `tur, et natura servetur`), splitting *detrahantur*; fills p. 287's left column; and **closes three lines down p. 287's RIGHT column at `…et divinae imperium voluntatis.`, immediately above the centred `Cap. VI.` with its TWO-line subtitle `De consequentibus ad iudicium, sicut est / poena infernalis.`** ★ **That heading, read directly off the band, is what closes Cap. V, and nothing else was used.** The index's hypothesis (Cap. VI at p. 287, therefore Cap. V running 286–287) turns out right and **was used for nothing** — the fifth correct index opening in a row in this pars, which remains worth nothing. **The running heads were used for nothing**: p. 286's reads `BREVILOQUII PARS VII. C. V.` although its first six lines are still Cap. IV, and p. 287's reads `PARS VII. C. VI.` although its entire left column and the head of its right column are still Cap. V — **the running head running a unit AHEAD on five consecutive leaves now, and on sixteen of the last eighteen.** ★ **Nor was any break SHAPE treated as evidence**; in particular the paragraph-boundary break at the p. 286 gutter is exactly the shape that would tempt a boundary claim, and it is not one. The `title_la` is taken from the `Cap. V.` heading itself, not from the volume index.

**Gutters — BOTH leaves measured fresh with no constant.**
- **★ p. 286 = 1342, RE-DERIVED rather than adopted, and the predecessor's value confirmed exactly.** `colcrop.py vol5 286` with no constant returns **1342 on a 59 px run**; **thirteen** windows from 15 % to 90 % agree **1340–1343 on runs of 59–64 px**, and the two windows that blow out (5–20 % at 114 px, 10–25 % at 153 px, 70–85 % at 220 px) are discarded on run width alone. The per-column ink profile over body rows settles it independently: the left column's ink dies at **x = 1311** and the right column's resumes at **x = 1373**, so the zero band is **x = 1312–1372, 61 px**, with a **very heavily inked** rule inside it at **x = 1339–1344** (peaking 473 rows against a 3-row floor), sitting almost exactly **centred**. Band midpoint **1342**. `bon-brev-p7-c4`'s **1342** therefore stands, and its diagnosis — that a heavy but centred rule leaves the measurement alone — is **independently confirmed**.
- **★★ p. 287 = 1163, first measured here, and the DEFAULT IS REJECTED.** `colcrop.py vol5 287` with no constant returns **1160 on a 55 px run** — under the 60 px floor, and therefore a *quiet* failure of exactly the kind the frozen rule warns about, since it flags nothing and returns a plausible number. **Twelve** windows from 20 % to 75 % agree **1162–1163 on runs of 61–64 px**, with 1163 the modal value; the three upper windows (5–30 %) return 1297–1324 on 333–369 px runs and are discarded. The per-column ink profile over body rows: the left column dies at **x = 1132**, the right resumes at **x = 1194**, band **x = 1133–1193, 61 px**, midpoint **1163**. Inside that band stands **the heaviest centre rule met anywhere in this quire — x = 1158–1164, peaking 1127 rows against a 3-row floor**, more than twice p. 283's 546 and p. 286's 473. ★ **And it sits fractionally LEFT of the band's centre (rule centre 1161 against band centre 1163), which is why the 45–92 % default drifted down to 1160 and lost 6 px of run.** This is the third leaf in four to show that ink weight and displacement are independent variables: p. 286's rule is heavy and centred and costs nothing; p. 287's is heavier still and barely off centre and costs the default six pixels of run and three of value; p. 284's was *faint* and centred and destroyed the run outright. **Only the per-column profile tells you which case you have.**
- ★ **Twenty-four consecutive leaves now measure 1150 · 1422 · 1163 · 1370 · 1186 · 1373 · 1202 · 1326 · 1164 · 1403 · 1145 · 1392 · 1247 · 1351 · 1191 · 1331 · 1231 · 1357 · 1169 · 1386 · 1234 · 1342 · 1163. Parity predicts nothing, proximity predicts nothing** — p. 287 (odd) at 1163 sits within a pixel of p. 267's 1163 twenty leaves back and nowhere near either neighbour.

**Apparatus source.** Vol V's IA OCR renders footnote numerals as punctuation glyphs — anchor POSITIONS survive in the raw, numbers and footer-entry openers do NOT. **All twelve notes here were read off the 450 dpi footer bands** (6 bands at 2.6× for the body, then direct crops of the footer registers at 3.4–5× and single-glyph crops at 8–12× for the digits and sigla); the counts are band-derived. `audit-apparatus-count` is blind to Vol V; `tools/check-vol5-apparatus.py` is the instrument. **p. 286's total of 8 was established by `bon-brev-p7-c4` and is re-confirmed here from the bands; p. 287's total of 9 is established here** and entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`.

**★★ THE INCOMING HAND-OFF WAS A CLAIM AND IT WAS RE-DERIVED IN FULL — AND ONE OF ITS DIGITS IS CORRECTED.** `bon-brev-p7-c4` forwarded p. 286's nn. 2–8 with the block structure and the verbatim text of all seven verified, with n. 1's anchor and column verified (which is how the capitulum split 1/7 was fixed), and **explicitly claimed no anchor word, no column and no digit in any of the seven**. Verification level of every note **as established here**:
- **p. 286 n. 2** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS and SIGLA all established here.** Anchors on `et vitia detrahentur ² »,` in the **LEFT** column, inside *Thesis 2*.
- **p. 286 n. 3** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS all established here.** Anchors on `salvis capillis ³ et ceteris membris` in the **LEFT** column, inside *Thesis 3*.
- **p. 286 n. 4** — text inherited **as two halves and joined here**; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS and SIGLA all established here.** Anchors on `quandam *appropriationem* ⁴ sit` in the **LEFT** column, inside the *Principia* period. **Rendered JOINED above; the gutter test that discovered the join was `p7-c4`'s and is NOT re-logged.**
- **p. 286 n. 5** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, SIGLA established here, and ONE DIGIT CORRECTED — see below.** Anchors on `inclinationem mutuam ⁵:` in the **RIGHT** column.
- **p. 286 n. 6** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS established here.** Anchors on `*pugnet orbis terrarum* ⁶.` in the **RIGHT** column, closing the *Rationes 3* period.
- **p. 286 n. 7** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, SIGLA established here.** Anchors on `omnis anima corpori semel ⁷ et` in the **RIGHT** column.
- **p. 286 n. 8** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS established here.** Anchors on `sed ad supplicium ⁸;` in the **RIGHT** column.
- **p. 287 nn. 1–5** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN, ANCHOR WORD, OWNERSHIP, EXTENT, DIGITS and SIGLA **all verified here.** n. 1 on `licet « non in mole ¹ »,`; n. 2 on `habet fieri ² »:`; n. 3 on `caro *secundum materiam* ³ et partes`; n. 4 on `nihil debuit facere frustra ⁴:`; n. 5 on `generabile sit corruptibile ⁵, nec` — **all five in p. 287's LEFT column. p. 287's nn. 6–9 are Cap. VI's and are forwarded.**

**★★ A DIGIT OF THE HAND-OFF'S IS CORRECTED: p. 286 n. 5 reads `I. Phys. text. 81.`, NOT `text. 84.`** The hand-off transcribed `text. 84. (c. 9.)` while claiming no digit, and the correction is made here on three independent grounds. **(a) The glyph.** At a direct 12× crop the second sort is a plain upright carrying a small top-left flag and a broad foot serif — the same sort as the `1` of `a. 1.` in p. 286 n. 3 and quite unlike the closed-triangle `4` standing beside it there in `d. 43.` and `d. 44.` **(b) A second witness.** The raw prints `I. Pliys. text. 81. (c. 9.)` at `doctorisseraphic05bona_djvu.txt` L≈51882 — one of the few places in this register where the raw is legible on a digit, and it agrees. **(c) Sense.** Book I of the *Physics* runs to 83 texts in the Latin numbering, so `84` would fall in Book II; and text 81 sits in c. 9, which the note itself gives, where matter is said to desire form as the female the male — precisely the *mutuum appetitum et inclinationem mutuam* of the anchor. ★ **`text. 84` names nothing in Book I at all, which is the strongest of the three.**

**★ p. 286's SPLIT MAP — re-confirmed, not re-derived from scratch.** Left footer block nn. 1, 2, 3, 4 with **n. 4 straddling the gutter**; right block opens **UNNUMBERED** at n. 4's continuation `O P V *praemiorum*, D…`, then nn. 5, 6, 7, 8, ending complete at `…in resurrectionem iudicii.` with blank paper beneath. **Anchors:** nn. 1–4 **LEFT**, nn. 5–8 **RIGHT**. **Total 8. Block split 4/4, anchor split 4/4, capitulum split 1/7** — the capitulum boundary falling inside the LEFT footer block, between nn. 1 and 2, exactly as `p7-c4` recorded.

**★★ p. 287's SPLIT MAP.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 — **n. 5 straddling the gutter, breaking off MID-WORD at `…in corp., ex qua quae-`** with a blank tail beneath and no printer's signature. Right footer block: n. 5's unnumbered continuation (`dam supra pag. 216, nota 3. — Post *seminalibus* P addit *rationibus*.`), then nn. 6, 7, 8, 9, ending complete at `…et pro *summa* D *divina*, M *sua*.` with blank paper beneath. **Anchors:** nn. 1–5 **LEFT**; nn. 6–9 **RIGHT**. **Total 9. Block split 5/4, anchor split 5/4, capitulum split 5/4** — and here, unusually, all three lines coincide, because the Cap. VI heading falls three lines into the right column and above every one of that column's anchors. ★ **That coincidence is a fact about this leaf and is not a pattern**: p. 286, one leaf back, has block and anchor coinciding at 4/4 while the capitulum splits 1/7.

**★ SIGLA — six runs on these two leaves, and the one-upright rule decides four of them.**
1. **`I K L O P V` (p. 286 n. 4)**, **`I M` (p. 286 n. 5)**, **`F I K L O U V` (p. 286 n. 7)**, **`I K L U` (p. 287 n. 3)** — in every one the sort in question stands on a **SINGLE upright** and is therefore `I`, never a crossbar-less `H`, which needs two; and every run ascends alphabetically, which corroborates. The raw prints `IKL` / `0 P V`, `I M`, `F I K L 0 U V` and `1 K L U`, merging `O` to a zero and `I` to a `1` — the corruption class the frozen rule names — and agrees on the letter in every case.
2. **`K P et 1` (p. 287 n. 2)** — the only place on these leaves where a codex siglum and an EDITION siglum stand touching, and the frozen rule's own trap. `K P` are codices; the following `1` is a serif edition numeral, settled by exhaustion (Vol V has only editions 1, 2, 3 beside `Vat.`) and by the fact that a codex `I` would have to precede `K` in an ascending run, not follow `P`.
3. **`D`, `K`, `P`, `M` singletons** (p. 286 n. 4; p. 287 nn. 1, 2, 5) — unambiguous.
4. **EDITION sigla standing in the same registers as the codex letters:** `Vat., 1 et 3` (p. 286 n. 2; p. 287 n. 4), `edd., excepta 2` (p. 286 n. 4), `edd.` (p. 286 n. 5), `et 2` (p. 287 n. 1).

**Digits settled off the band, each with something independent agreeing** (per the frozen rule). ★ **The `1`/`4` class dominates both leaves and the `3`/`5` class does not appear at all — the mirror of p. 285, whose hard decisions were all scriptural chapter-and-verse pairs.**
- **★★ p. 286 n. 3's `IV. Sent. d. 43. a. 1. et d. 44. p. I.` — three `1`/`4` decisions inside nine characters, settled DECISIVELY by reading the targets.** Vol IV `bon-sent-IV-d43-a1-q1…q6` is *Utrum resurrectio sit futura* / *sit omnium* / *sit omnium simul, an successive* / *sit eorundem secundum numerum* / *sit naturalis, an miraculosa* / *Quae sit causa nostrae resurrectionis* ✓ — and this chapter's *Thesis 1* asserts, in order, that the resurrection will be, that it will be of all men's bodies, that there is no distance of *time* (i.e. it is simultaneous), and that the bodies are *eadem numero*. **The articulus answers the thesis question for question.** And `bon-sent-IV-d44-p1-*` is *De qualitate et conditione resurgentium* — humours, hair and nails, flesh according to species and matter, the deformities of elect and damned ✓ — which is this chapter's *Thesis 3* and the whole *si aliquod membrum deerat* series. `d. 41` / `d. 14` and `d. 41` name nothing of the kind.
- **★★ p. 286 n. 4's `supra p. I. c. 6.` — settled by the target.** `bon-brev-p1-c6` is *De unitate divinae naturae in multiplicitate appropriatorum* ✓ — the *appropriation* chapter, and the anchor is the word *appropriationem* itself. `c. 1` and `c. 4` name nothing of the kind.
- **★★ p. 286 n. 5's `text. 81.` — corrected here; see the paragraph above.** `c. 35. n. 68.` of *De Gen. ad lit.* XII is corroborated by content: XII.35 is the *naturalis appetitus corpus administrandi*, the soul's natural appetite for its body — the anchor's *mutuum appetitum*. Both digits print unambiguously at 3.4×; neither is a `3`/`5` decision, the `3` and the `5` of `35` standing side by side in different shapes.
- **★★ p. 286 n. 2's `XXII. de Civ. Dei, c. 17.` and `Eph. 4, 13.` — settled by each other.** *De Civitate Dei* XXII.17 is the chapter on the resurrection of the female sex, and it turns on Eph. 4:13 *in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi* ✓ — the very verse the note gives as *Seq. locus* and the very words the body quotes at the anchor. `c. 47` is out of range; XXII has 30 chapters.
- **★ p. 286 n. 3's `Luc. 21, 18` — settled by its own quotation** (*Et capillus de capite vestro non peribit* ✓, against the anchor's *salvis capillis*), **and `Enchirid. c. 88. n. 23.`** by content: the *Enchiridion*'s treatment of the resurrection of hair and nails stands there under Migne's dual caput/numerus division, which is the form the note uses.
- **★ p. 286 n. 6's `Sap. 5, 21` and n. 8's `Ioan. 5, 29` — both settled by the verses the notes themselves print**, verbatim Vulgate ✓, and both matching their anchors (*pugnet orbis terrarum*; *non est ad vitam, sed ad supplicium*).
- **★★ p. 287 n. 1's `XXII. de Civ. Dei, c. 14.` — a `1`/`4` decision with both classes' glyphs in the same numeral, settled by the target.** *De Civ. Dei* XXII.14 is *De infantibus qui in parvula aetate moriuntur* — whether those who die as little children rise in the stature they would have had — and it is the source of the *non in mole* the note itself flags as a variant. **The anchor is `si parvulus erat` ✓.** `c. 11` and `c. 44` name nothing of the kind, and c. 44 is out of range.
- **★ p. 287 n. 2's `II. de Anima, text. 26. (c. 2.)`** — *De Anima* II.2, 414a25, is where the proper act is said to come to be in its proper matter ✓, quoted verbatim at the anchor.
- **★★ p. 287 n. 5's `II. Sent. d. 18. a. 1. q. 2.` — a `1`/`4` decision settled by the target.** `bon-sent-II-d18-a1-q2` is *Utrum mulier formata fuerit de costa viri secundum rationem seminalem* ✓ — the *seminal reasons* question, which is exactly what the note sends the reader to (*De causis seminalibus etc.*), against an anchor that denies the resurrection to *seminales causae*. `d. 48` of Book II is the last distinction and treats no such thing.
- **★ p. 287 nn. 3, 4, 5's page references** `tom. II. pag. 734`, `supra pag. 271`, `tom. IV. pag. 888`, `supra pag. 227`, `supra pag. 216` — all read unambiguously at 4–5×; Vol IV p. 888 falls inside d. 43, the resurrection distinction whose a. 1 the previous leaf's n. 3 has just cited, and Vol V pp. 216 and 227 fall in Pars I and Pars II respectively, both of which this work has already translated.

**Runover tests — TWO RUN, ONE POSITIVE, ONE NEGATIVE, each closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter, p. 287's own — **POSITIVE**, logged as `p.287 n.5:gutter`.* p. 287's left footer block ends **MID-WORD** at n. 5's `… vide II. Sent. d. 18. a. 1. q. 2. in corp., ex qua quae-`, with a blank tail beneath and no printer's signature; and p. 287's right block opens **UNNUMBERED** at `dam supra pag. 216, nota 3. — Post *seminalibus* P addit *rationibus*.`, before n. 6's numbered `De quibus in hoc et seq. cap.` **The note is rendered JOINED in the apparatus above.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 286 → p. 287 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 286's right block ends **complete** at n. 8's `…in resurrectionem iudicii.` with blank paper beneath (the upper side, read by `p7-c4` and re-read here); and **p. 287's left block opens NUMBERED** at `¹ Ut ait August. XXII. de Civ. Dei, c. 14.` Nothing logged. ★ **This is the crossing `p7-c4` deliberately left to this chunk, and it is closed here.**
- *NOT run here, and forwarded:* the **p. 287 → p. 288 page-crossing**. p. 287's right block ends complete at n. 9's `…et pro *summa* D *divina*, M *sua*.` with blank paper beneath and no printer's signature, so the upper side is done; but n. 9 is Cap. VI's note and p. 288 is off this chunk's leaves. **The test is `bon-brev-p7-c6`'s to close from both sides.**
- *NOT re-logged here, and NOT re-run:* **p. 286's own gutter test** (`p7-c4`, POSITIVE, logged as `p.286 n.4:gutter` on the standing rule that a leaf's gutter test belongs to the chunk that FIRST reaches the leaf — this chunk owns n. 4 and renders it joined, which is a different act from logging it); **`p.285 n.4:gutter`** (`p7-c4`, POSITIVE) and the **p. 285 → p. 286 page-crossing** (`p7-c4`, NEGATIVE); p. 284's own gutter test and the p. 284 → p. 285 test (both `p7-c3`, both NEGATIVE); `p.283 n.4:gutter` (`p7-c2`, POSITIVE) and the p. 283 → p. 284 test (`p7-c2`, NEGATIVE); `p.281 n.3:gutter` and `p.282 n.4:gutter` (both `p7-c1`, both POSITIVE), the p. 281 → p. 282 and p. 282 → p. 283 tests (both `p7-c1`, both NEGATIVE); the p. 280 → p. 281 test, p. 280's own gutter test and the p. 279 → p. 280 test (all three `p6-c13`, all NEGATIVE); `p.279 n.3:gutter`, `p.278 n.2:gutter`, `p.277 n.7:page` (all three `p6-c12`, all POSITIVE) and the p. 278 → p. 279 test (`p6-c12`, NEGATIVE); p. 277's own gutter test and the p. 276 → p. 277 test (both `p6-c11`, both NEGATIVE); `p.276 n.3:gutter` and the p. 275 → p. 276 test (both `p6-c10`); `p.274 n.5:gutter`, `p.275 n.4:gutter`, the p. 273 → p. 274 and p. 274 → p. 275 tests (all four `p6-c9`); `p.273 n.5:gutter` and the p. 272 → p. 273 test (both `p6-c8`); `p.272 n.5:gutter` and the p. 271 → p. 272 test (both `p6-c7`); `p.270 n.4:gutter`, the p. 270 → p. 271 test and p. 271's own gutter test (all three `p6-c6`); `p.269 n.4:gutter` and the p. 269 → p. 270 test (both `p6-c5`); `p.268 n.4:gutter` and the p. 268 → p. 269 test (both `p6-c4`); `p.267 n.4:gutter` and the p. 267 → p. 268 test (both `p6-c3`); `p.266 n.3:gutter` and the p. 266 → p. 267 test (both `p6-c2`); p. 265's own gutter test and the p. 265 → p. 266 test (both `p6-c1`); the p. 264 → p. 265 test, p. 264's own gutter test and the p. 263 → p. 264 test (all `p5-c10`); and everything on the earlier do-not-re-log lists. Corpus-wide runover and chunk totals are **not written here** — derive them with `tools/check-vol5-census.py`.

**★ THE PRINTER'S SIGNATURE.** Neither p. 286 nor p. 287 carries `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` or a quire number; all four column feet were checked at 2.6× and again at direct crop, and all four are blank paper. (p. 286's feet were also checked by `p7-c4`.) The eight-leaf cadence puts quire 34 on p. 265, quire 35 on p. 273 and quire 36 on p. 281, so **the next is due around p. 289** — inside Cap. VI or Cap. VII on the index's showing, and therefore a live hazard for `bon-brev-p7-c6` and after. Nothing of the kind was transcribed into the apparatus, and no note's foot was mistaken for one.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order; glosses stand in the outer margin of each column): p. 286 left column — "Thesis 1." — "Thesis 2." — "Thesis 3." — "Ratio." — "Principia."; p. 286 right column — "Rationes 3 pro thesi 1." — "Arguitur ex 1. ratione." — "Resurgent omnes." — "Simul." — "Pro thesi 2." — "Item, ex 2. ratione." — "Vitia detrahentur."; p. 287 left column — "Defectus supplebuntur." — "Item, ex ratione 3. pro thesi 3." — "Corpus idem immortale, ex omnibus partibus constitutum." — "Virtute supernaturali."; p. 287 right column — none (the three lines of Cap. V on that column carry no gloss). ★ **Sixteen glosses, and Cap. V is the FOURTEENTH distinct form in fourteen consecutive chapters.** It returns to **THREE** theses after Cap. IV's two, but it does not return to Cap. III's shape either: it runs a *double* series, announcing `Rationes 3 pro thesi 1.` as a header and then discharging the three reasons by `Arguitur ex 1. ratione.` / `Item, ex 2. ratione.` / `Item, ex ratione 3. pro thesi 3.` — **with the word order of the third inverted (`ex ratione 3.`, not `ex 3. ratione.`)** — while interleaving content glosses (`Resurgent omnes.`, `Simul.`, `Vitia detrahentur.`, `Defectus supplebuntur.`) and pinning the second and third theses to their reasons in passing (`Pro thesi 2.`, `pro thesi 3.`). **No previous chapter has run a reason-series and a thesis-series simultaneously.** ★ **Infer NOTHING from it; fourteen chapters, fourteen forms.** ★ **The `Thesis N.` and `pro thesi N.` numerals are all `1`/`4` decisions settled by the SERIES** — there are exactly three theses, `2` and `3` print unambiguously in both series, so the opening member of each can only be 1. ★ **The raw prints the fifth right-column gloss `Pro ihcsi 3.`; the band prints `Pro thesi 2.` and the band wins** — the sense agrees, since the passage it stands beside (*malis resurrectio non est ad vitam, sed ad supplicium… cum infirmitatibus, deformitatibus et defectibus suscitentur*) is Thesis 2's *mali surgent cum suis deformitatibus* and nothing else. ★ **`p7-c4` forwarded no gloss list for these leaves, having claimed no span past p. 286's sixth line; all sixteen are first reads.**

**Raw-quality grade, per page, per region and per column-run** (the raw was a cross-check only, never the base). **p. 286 body — moderate and even in both columns**, the chronic bracket-and-ligature class confined to single letters (`niilitudinem`, `[Mssunt`, `coqMra`, `universalis.nmv.m`, `iii collatione`, `necessurio`, `tan(iuam`, `ap[)elitum`, `fulei`); **p. 286 footer — moderate, and better than its body on the one digit that mattered**, printing `text. 81.` correctly where the hand-off had 84, and `d. 43. a. I. et d. 44. p. I.` correctly, while garbling `Enchirid. c. 88. ii. 23.`, `loan. S, 29` and `simut` for *simul*. **★ p. 286's MARGIN is the region that fails on this leaf, and it fails on a digit: `Pro ihcsi 3.` for `Pro thesi 2.`** — a region-level verdict that neither the body's nor the footer's would have predicted. **p. 287 body — moderate, and DEGRADING down the left column** (clean through `Opportunum etiam esst`, then `ordinatipneni`, `perti-cere`, `totain`, and at the foot of the run a spurious `e\,` inserted into `constitutum, et salva tota veritate naturae`, which the band settles); **p. 287 footer — moderate and notably good**, reproducing `d. 18. a. 1. q. 2.`, `pag. 734`, `pag. 271`, `pag. 888`, `pag. 227` and `pag. 216` all correctly, and failing only on `c. 1 i.` for `c. 14.` and `73i` for `734`. ★ **On these two leaves the footer graded better than the body on both, which is the reverse of p. 285's verdict two leaves back — the grade moves within the run and the page-level verdict was never the same as the region-level one.**

**⚠ NO NEW `[?]` FLAG IS RAISED HERE.** Nothing on the two leaves was found to be ambiguous after the band work. The one digit corrected against the hand-off (`text. 81` for `text. 84`) is settled by three independent witnesses and is not a flag; the one place raw and band disagree on a gloss numeral (`Pro thesi 2.` against the raw's `3`) is settled by the band and by sense and is not a flag either.

**⚠ THREE INHERITED `[?]` FLAGS TRAVEL FORWARD, NONE RESOLVED, NONE RE-FLAGGED.**
1. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 271 n. 2, `E F G H minus, aptae ponunt et`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c6`). **p. 271 is off this chunk's leaves entirely.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c6` unchanged.
2. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 272 n. 6, `Respicitur Col. 6, 12.`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c7`). Colossians still has four chapters and the sense still requires Ephes. 6:12; **no disposition is recorded, and `build-citations.py`'s QA line on it remains expected behaviour, not a defect.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c6`.
3. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 282 n. 4's lemma `Pro *quibus sufficienter purgatis*` against the body's `expurgatis`** (raised and owned by `bon-brev-p7-c2`). **p. 282 is off this chunk's leaves and this chunk brings nothing new to it.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c6`.
★ **Flags that are DISCHARGED or CLOSED and are NOT resurrected here: `p6-c10`'s `d. 23.`, the `c. 13.` flag on p. 277 n. 7, and p. 280 n. 6's `homo non separe`.** ★ **And two readings that are NOT flags and must not be "fixed": p. 284's `de Cura pro mortuis agenda` for the received *gerenda* (Cap. III's text, transcribed as printed by `p7-c3`), and the faded scan streak on p. 283's right column, which is photographic and has six determinate readings.** ★ **One QA line that is not a defect: `bon-brev-p6-c8`'s `apparatus:p273-6` dangling `tom. I. pag. 155` is GALLAND's *Bibliotheca*, a parser limitation.**

**Register — the RESURRECTION-OF-THE-BODY vocabulary was CONSULTED from Vol IV and FOLLOWED, not innovated; the eschatological, purgatorial, suffrages, conflagration and world-renewal settlements from `p7-c1` through `p7-c4` are carried unchanged.** ★ **The apparatus named its own targets and they were read.** **Vol IV chunks consulted:** **`bon-sent-IV-d43-a1-q1…q6`** — the resurrection in general, entire, the first target of p. 286 n. 3 and the source of *Thesis 1* article for article; **`bon-sent-IV-d44-p1-a1-q1`, `a1-q2`, `a2-q1`, `a2-q2`, `a3-q1`, `a3-q2`** — the quality and condition of the risen, entire, the second target of that note and the source of *Thesis 3* and of the whole *si aliquod membrum deerat* series; and, more briefly, `bon-sent-IV-d43-a1-q4` again for the *sinus naturae* passage, which it renders. **Carried from that settlement, not re-decided:** ***resurrectio* → "resurrection"** throughout, never "rising again", but ***resurgere / surgere* → "rise again"** as d. 43 a. 1 sets them; ***idem numero / eadem numero* → "the same in number"**, d. 43 a. 1 q. 4's own phrase (*Utrum resurrectio sit eorundem secundum numerum* → "Whether the resurrection will be of the same bodies according to number"); ***membra principalia* → "principal members"** and ***humiditas radicalis* → "radical moisture"**, both straight from d. 44 p. I a. 1 q. 1; ***caro secundum speciem / secundum materiam* → "flesh according to species / according to matter"**, d. 44 p. I a. 2 q. 1's controlling pair, kept in that exact form because that question turns on it; ***superfluitas* → "superfluity"**, d. 44 p. I a. 1 q. 2's own word (*quae spectant ad superfluitatem*); ***deformitates* → "deformities"**, d. 44 p. I a. 3's title word for both the elect and the damned; ***sinus naturae* → "recesses of nature"**, exactly as `bon-sent-IV-d43-a1-q4` renders Augustine's *occultissimos sinus naturae*; ***rationes seminales / causae seminales* → "seminal reasons / seminal causes"**, the standing corpus rendering. **Fixed here for this capitulum:** *ordo temporis* / *ordo dignitatis* → "the order of time" / "the order of dignity", the pair *Thesis 1* turns on; *integro corpore et plena aetate et debita mensura membrorum* → "with an entire body and full age and the due measure of their members", keeping *integer* → "entire" distinct from p. 287's *omnes integri et perfecti* → "all whole and perfect", where the adjective is predicated of persons; *in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi* → "unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ", the Douay-Rheims Eph. 4:13 the note itself names, and printed identically at both its occurrences because Bonaventure repeats it to close the member he opened with it; *decentia corporis* → "the seemliness of the body" against *effigies formosa* → "a comely figure"; *pulvis humani corporis* → "the dust of the human body"; *non in mole* → "not in bulk", following Augustine's own contrast of *moles* with *aetas*; *parvulus / decrepitus / gigas / nanus* → "a little child / decrepit / a giant / a dwarf"; *deordinatio membrorum* → "disorder of the members" against *ordinatio* → "ordering", kept cognate because the *ordinatio necessaria / de congruo* pair two paragraphs later depends on hearing the same root; *ordo necessitatis / ordo congruitatis* → "the order of necessity / the order of fittingness", and *de congruo* → "of fittingness" with it; *de bene esse corporis* → "of the well-being of the body", the standing scholastic pair with *esse*; *appropriatio* → "appropriation" (Breviloquium P. I c. 6's own term, which the note cites); *universalissimum / sufficientissimum / potentissimum / clementissimum / iustissimum* → "most universal / most sufficient / most powerful / most clement / most just", the fivefold superlative series kept uniform in English because the *singula sunt in singulis* clause depends on it; *retributio stipendiorum* → "the retribution of wages" against *praemium* → "reward"; *resurrectio ad vitam / ad supplicium* → "the resurrection unto life / unto punishment", and John 5:29's *resurrectio vitae / resurrectio iudicii* → "the resurrection of life / the resurrection of judgment", the two deliberately kept apart because the note gives the verse and the body paraphrases it; *primordiales causae* → "primordial causes", kept audibly distinct from *seminales* and *naturales*, since the whole last clause turns on the three being three. Quaracchi's em-dash articulations are preserved throughout, and Bonaventure's *quia/cum/ideo* chains are kept as one English sentence — the *Ratio* period (which runs unbroken across the p. 286 column break), and the *Primo igitur*, *Rursus* and *Postremo* periods each run as a single sentence.


site: bonaventure

collection: Breviloquium

title: Pars 7, Cap. 6

author: St. Bonaventure

languages: en la

title: Opera Omnia (Quaracchi critical edition)

publisher: Collegii S. Bonaventurae

source_text:
<!-- page 287 -->

### Capitulum VI. *De consequentibus ad iudicium, sicut est poena infernalis.*

Consequenter de *consequentibus* ad iudicium est dicendum; quae sunt duo, scilicet *poena infernalis* et *gloria caelestis*[^p287-6].

De *poena* igitur *infernali* hoc tenendum est, quod poena infernalis est in loco corporali deorsum, in quo aeternaliter affligentur omnes reprobi, tam homines quam spiritus mali. — Affligentur autem eodem igne corporali, qui concremabit et affliget spiritus et etiam corpora — nec tamen corpora illa consumet, sed semper affliget — alios plus, alios minus secundum exigentiam meritorum. — Huiusmodi autem afflictioni ignis coniuncta erit afflictio secundum omnes sensus, coniuncta erit poena vermis et carentia visionis Dei, ita quod in his poenis erit *varietas* et cum varietate *acerbitas* et cum acerbitate *interminabilitas*, ut ad reproborum supplicium *tormentorum fumus ascendat in saecula saeculorum*[^p287-7].

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum primum principium, eo ipso quod primum, sit summum, quidquid habet habet in summo; ideo necesse est, ipsum esse *rectissimum*. Cum ergo in retribuendo agat secundum rectitudinem; sicut contra se facere non potest nec *se negare*[^p287-8] nec suam iustitiam impugnare: sic necessario, sua rectitudine exigente, oportet, quod peccatum puniatur secundum quantitatem culpae, in his maxime, qui, legem misericordiae contemnentes, per impoenitentiam impegerunt in severitatem iustitiae. Quoniam ergo severitatis iustitiae est considerare culpam non solum quantum ad *radicem*, verum etiam quantum ad *circumstantias aggravantes*; congruentissimum est, ut iudex iustus poenas debitas ab impiis exigat usque ad ultimum quadrantem[^p287-9], ut sic non remaneat « dedecus peccati sine decore iustitiae »; et sicut manifesta est *potestas* in creando et *sapientia*
<!-- page 288 -->
in gubernando et *clementia* in reparando, sic manifestetur summa *iustitia* in puniendo. Quoniam ergo divina iustitia peccatorem impium debet punire secundum exigentiam culpae; et culpa mortalis, ad quam succedit finalis impoenitentia, ipsa habet rationem deordinationis *perpetuae*, deordinationis *libidinosae*, deordinationis *multimodae*: necesse est, quod ipsa puniatur poenarum *aeternitate, acerbitate* et *multiformitate*.

Primo igitur[^p288-1] deordinationis *perpetuae* poena debet esse *perpetua*, quia peccatum, quod quis committit et de quo nunquam poenitet, perpetuo in anima durat et a vita perpetua, scilicet Deo, separat et a voluntate procedit, quae in peccato vellet perpetuo delectari. Et licet *delectatio* illa transiens sit momentanea, quia tamen *deordinatio* tenet rationem perpetuitatis; poena *deordinationi* respondens debet habere carentiam finis; ut, sicut *homo* in suo perpetuo[^p288-2] finem non apposuit a peccato recedendo, sic *Deus* in suo perpetuo non desistat a puniendo; et sicut contra infinitum peccavit, sic poenam habeat infinitam; et quia non potest habere poenam infinitam *intensione*, habeat saltem *duratione*; et sicut voluntas eius post mortem semper malo adhaeret sine susceptione poenitentiae, sic Deus semper affligat sine immutatione sententiae, requirente hoc *perpetuitate deordinationis* in impiis damnatis.

Rursus, quoniam deordinationis *libidinosae* poena debet esse *afflictiva*, quia delectatio punitur per tristitiam contrariam; et spiritus rationalis in peccando convertit se ad bonum proprium et *ut nunc* et partiale[^p288-3] libidinose amandum, et ex hoc contemnit divinum imperium et dominium: hinc est, quod ad hoc, quod illa delectatio improba perfecte puniatur, in qua simul est delectatio cum contemptu, necesse est, quod ad punitionem illius contemptus et delectationis peccator, sive homo sit, sive spiritus, praecipitetur in *locum infimum* et maxime a statu gloriae longinquum, hoc est in profundissimum infernum. — Necesse est etiam, quod ibi exponatur affligendus *infimae naturae*, ac per hoc non a substantia spirituali patiatur, sed a *corporali et infima*, hoc est a faecibus corporum mundanorum, ut in faecibus defigatur et *igne et sulphure* concremetur[^p288-4]. Et quoniam spiritus, qui per naturam praeponitur corpori et in corpus habet influere et ipsum movere, dignitatem naturae per culpam pervertit et se subiicit quodam modo vilitati et nihilitati peccati; hinc est, quod secundum ordinem iustitiae debet ordinari, ut tam peccator spiritus quam homo igni corporeo alligetur, non ut in illum influat vitam, sed ut divino decreto suscipiat poenam. Cum enim rei, quam *horret* per timorem divinitus immissum et quam *sentit* per vim naturalis sensus, sit inseparabiliter alligatus; necesse est, quod acriter tormentetur. — Et quia ille ignis non agit nisi per dispositionem peccati et reatus et maculae ex improbitate libidinis procedentis; et haec non est aequaliter in omnibus: hinc est, quod ab eodem igne alii cremantur plus, alii vero minus, sicut ab eodem igne aliter uritur palea, et aliter comburitur lignum[^p288-5]. — Quoniam autem illa peccati distinctio et reatus, secundum quam actio ignis moderatur, in eodem est uniformis et nunquam crescit nec decrescit nec mutatur; hinc est, quod divino imperio ordinante, ille sic agit, quod semper urit et non consumit, semper affligit et non interimit, quia non agit ad suae formae multiplicationem, sed ad pacis animae in corpore perturbationem, sive ipsius spiritus in se ipso. Unde non fit nova ademptio, sed ademptae pacis continuatio; ut sic in eadem poena nec acerbitas aeternitatem, nec aeternitas tollat acerbitatem.

Postremo, quoniam deordinationis *multimodae* poena debet esse *multimoda*; et in omni peccato actuali mortali est deordinata aversio a summa luce et bonitate et inordinata conversio ad bonum commutabile et deordinatio voluntatis contra dictamen rationis rectae[^p288-6]: hinc est, quod omnes actualiter peccantes, qui erunt damnati, punientur poena triplici: propter aversionem, *carentia visionis Dei*; propter conversionem, *poena incendii materialis*; propter pugnam voluntatis et rationis, *poena vermis*; ut sic ex hac multiplicitate poenarum afflicti et *varie* et *acerbe* et *aeternaliter* crucientur, et *tormentorum fumus ascendat in saecula saeculorum*. Amen.

---

english:
### Chapter VI. *On the things consequent upon the judgment, of which sort is the punishment of hell.*

Consequently we must speak of the things *consequent* upon the judgment; and these are two, namely the *punishment of hell* and the *glory of heaven*[^p287-6].

Concerning the *punishment of hell*, therefore, this must be held: that the punishment of hell is in a bodily place below, in which all the reprobate will be afflicted eternally, both men and evil spirits. — And they will be afflicted by the same bodily fire, which will burn up and afflict spirits and also bodies — yet it will not consume those bodies, but will always afflict them — some more, some less according to the requirement of their merits. — And to an affliction of this kind by fire there will be joined an affliction according to all the senses; there will be joined the punishment of the worm and the lack of the vision of God, so that in these punishments there will be *variety*, and with variety *bitterness*, and with bitterness *endlessness*, so that unto the torment of the reprobate *the smoke of their torments may ascend for ever and ever*[^p287-7].

Now the reason for the understanding of the aforesaid is this: since the first principle, by that very fact that it is first, is highest, whatever it has it has in the highest degree; therefore it is necessary that it be *most right*. Since therefore in rendering retribution it acts according to rectitude — just as it cannot act against itself nor *deny itself*[^p287-8] nor impugn its own justice — so necessarily, its own rectitude requiring it, it is fitting that sin be punished according to the quantity of the fault, and in these most of all who, despising the law of mercy, have dashed themselves through impenitence against the severity of justice. Since therefore it belongs to the severity of justice to consider the fault not only as to its *root*, but also as to the *aggravating circumstances*, it is most fitting that the just judge exact from the wicked the punishments due even to the last farthing[^p287-9], so that thus there may not remain « the disgrace of sin without the comeliness of justice »; and just as *power* is manifest in creating and *wisdom*
<!-- page 288 -->
in governing and *clemency* in repairing, so may the highest *justice* be made manifest in punishing. Since therefore the divine justice must punish the wicked sinner according to the requirement of his fault; and mortal fault, upon which final impenitence follows, has of itself the character of a *perpetual* disordering, of a *lustful* disordering, of a *manifold* disordering: it is necessary that it be punished by the *eternity, the bitterness* and the *multiformity* of punishments.

First, therefore[^p288-1], the punishment of a *perpetual* disordering must be *perpetual*, because the sin which one commits and of which he never repents endures perpetually in the soul, and separates from the perpetual life, namely from God, and proceeds from a will which would wish to take delight perpetually in sin. And although that passing *delight* is momentary, yet because the *disordering* holds the character of perpetuity, the punishment answering to the *disordering* must have a lack of any end; so that, just as *man* in his own perpetual state[^p288-2] set no end to it by withdrawing from sin, so *God* in his own perpetual state may not desist from punishing; and just as he sinned against the infinite, so may he have an infinite punishment; and because he cannot have a punishment infinite in *intensity*, may he have one at least in *duration*; and just as his will after death always cleaves to evil without any acceptance of repentance, so may God always afflict without any change of sentence — the *perpetuity of the disordering* in the wicked damned requiring this.

Again, since the punishment of a *lustful* disordering must be *afflictive*, because delight is punished by the contrary sorrow; and the rational spirit in sinning turns itself to its own good, and to a good *as of now* and partial[^p288-3], to be loved lustfully, and from this despises the divine command and lordship: hence it is that, in order that that wicked delight may be perfectly punished, in which there is at once delight together with contempt, it is necessary that, for the punishment of that contempt and of that delight, the sinner — whether he be man or spirit — be cast headlong into the *lowest place*, and the place furthest removed from the state of glory, that is, into the deepest hell. — It is necessary also that he be there set forth to be afflicted by a *lowest nature*, and thereby that he suffer not from a spiritual substance but from a *bodily and lowest* one, that is, from the dregs of the world's bodies, so that in the dregs he may be fixed fast and be burned up with *fire and brimstone*[^p288-4]. And since the spirit, which by nature is set over the body and has to pour influence into the body and to move it, has perverted the dignity of nature through fault and has subjected itself in a certain way to the vileness and nothingness of sin: hence it is that according to the order of justice it must be so ordered that both the sinning spirit and man be bound to a bodily fire, not that it may pour life into it, but that by the divine decree it may receive punishment. For since he is inseparably bound to a thing which he *shudders at* through a fear divinely sent upon him, and which he *feels* through the force of natural sense, it is necessary that he be sharply tormented. — And because that fire does not act save through the disposition of the sin and of the guilt and of the stain proceeding from the wickedness of lust; and this is not equally in all: hence it is that by the same fire some are burned more and others less, just as by the same fire straw is burned in one way and wood is consumed in another[^p288-5]. — But since that distinction of sin and that guilt, according to which the action of the fire is measured, is uniform in one and the same person and never grows nor diminishes nor is changed: hence it is that, the divine command ordaining it, that fire so acts that it always burns and does not consume, always afflicts and does not destroy, because it acts not unto the multiplication of its own form, but unto the disturbance of the soul's peace in the body, or of the spirit's own peace in itself. Whence there does not come about a new taking away, but the continuation of a peace already taken away; so that thus in one and the same punishment neither may the bitterness take away the eternity, nor the eternity the bitterness.

Lastly, since the punishment of a *manifold* disordering must be *manifold*; and in every actual mortal sin there is a disordered aversion from the highest light and goodness, and an inordinate conversion to changeable good, and a disordering of the will against the dictate of right reason[^p288-6]: hence it is that all who sin actually, and who will be damned, will be punished with a threefold punishment: for the aversion, the *lack of the vision of God*; for the conversion, the *punishment of material burning*; for the war of will and reason, the *punishment of the worm*; so that thus, afflicted by this multiplicity of punishments, they may be tormented *variously* and *bitterly* and *eternally*, and *the smoke of their torments may ascend for ever and ever*. Amen.

---

la: De quibus in hoc et seq. cap. — I K L O U V brevius: *Consequentia ad iudicium sunt duo* etc.

en: Of which [we treat] in this and the following chapter. — I K L O U V more briefly: *The things consequent upon the judgment are two*, etc.

la: Apoc. 14, 11. — De hoc cap. vide IV. Sent. d. 44. p. II. per totam et d. 50. p. II. a. 2. (de verme).

en: Apocalypse 14:11. — On this chapter see IV *Sent.* d. 44, part II, in its entirety, and d. 50, part II, a. 2 (on the worm).

la: Epist. II. Tim. 2, 13: Negare se ipsum non potest. — Superius Vat., 1 et 3 cum aliquot codd. omittunt *eo ipso quod primum*.

en: Second Epistle to Timothy 2:13: *He cannot deny himself.* — Above, the Vatican edition, 1 and 3, with some codices, omit *eo ipso quod primum*.

la: Respicitur Matth. 5, 26: Non exies inde, donec reddas novissimum quadrantem (F *novissimum quadrantem*). — Seq. sententia est August. supra pag. 224, nota 8. allegata. — Inferius pro *manifesta est* P *manifestata est*, I K L O U V *manifestatur*, et pro *summa* D *divina*, M *sua*.

en: Reference is made to Matthew 5:26: *Thou shalt not go out from thence till thou repay the last farthing* (F *novissimum quadrantem*). — The following sentence is Augustine's, cited above, p. 224, note 8. — Below, for *manifesta est* P reads *manifestata est*, I K L O U V *manifestatur*, and for *summa* D reads *divina*, M *sua*.

la: B H addunt *ratione*. Mox pro *anima*, quod habent plures codd., inter quos B E M, edd. *animo*.

en: B H add *ratione*. Shortly after, in place of *anima*, which several codices have, among them B E M, the editions read *animo*.

la: Libero arbitrio seu voluntate semper peccandi. Cfr. tom. IV. pag. 922, nota 1. — Superius voci *momentanea* G H et 1 praefigunt *et*. Inferius pro *habere* I L O U V *portare*.

en: By free choice, that is, by a will always [set on] sinning. Cf. vol. IV, p. 922, note 1. — Above, G H and edition 1 prefix *et* to the word *momentanea*. Below, for *habere* I L O U V read *portare*.

la: G P et 2 *particulare* (P et 2 omittunt cum F L M *et ut nunc*), M *speciale*, qui etiam subinde cum E I K L O P substituit *amando* pro *amandum*.

en: G P and edition 2 read *particulare* (P and edition 2, with F L M, omit *et ut nunc*), M *speciale*, which also thereupon, with E I K L O P, substitutes *amando* for *amandum*.

la: Apoc. 14, 10: Cruciabitur igne et sulphure. Soph. 1, 12: Visitabo super viros defixos in faecibus suis. Cfr. supra c. 2. — Superius pro *affligendus* K L O *puniendus*, et *natura* pro *substantia*. Inferius post *decreto* M addit *ab eo*.

en: Apocalypse 14:10: *He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone.* Sophonias 1:12: *I will visit upon the men that are settled on their lees.* Cf. above, c. 2. — Above, for *affligendus* K L O read *puniendus*, and *natura* for *substantia*. Below, after *decreto* M adds *ab eo*.

la: Cfr. I. Cor. 3, 12. seqq. — Superius pro *procedentis* T U et 1 *praecedentis* (vide tamen II. Sent. d. 31. a. 2. q. 3. in corp.), et pro *sicut ab eodem* plures codd., inter quos A L M P V, et 2 *sicut sub eodem*. Inferius pro *ordinante* M *moderante*.

en: Cf. I Corinthians 3:12 ff. — Above, for *procedentis* T U and edition 1 read *praecedentis* (see however II *Sent.* d. 31, a. 2, q. 3, in the body), and for *sicut ab eodem* several codices, among them A L M P V, and edition 2 read *sicut sub eodem*. Below, for *ordinante* M reads *moderante*.

en: See above, p. 180, note 6, and p. 224, note 8. ---

translators_notes:
**★★ PAGE SPAN — pp. 287–288, TWO LEAVES, AND THE CLOSE IS FIXED POSITIVELY FROM THE `Cap. VII.` HEADING ON THE PLATE.** `Cap. VI.` stands centred **three lines down p. 287's RIGHT column**, with a **TWO-line** subtitle `De consequentibus ad iudicium, sicut est / poena infernalis.`, immediately below Cap. V's close `…et divinae imperium voluntatis.` — heading, subtitle and opening period all re-set here word by word off the band rather than adopted from the hand-off, which had read only as far as `tam homines quam spiritus mali.` The capitulum fills the rest of p. 287's right column and breaks to p. 288 **at a word boundary mid-sentence** (`…et sicut manifesta est *potestas* in creando et *sapientia*` / `in gubernando et *clementia* in reparando`), stranding the second member of a three-member correlative; fills p. 288's left column; breaks to p. 288's right column **between a pair of governing genitives and the noun they depend on** (`…quodam modo vilitati et nihilitati` / `peccati; hinc est`), stranding both datives from *peccati*; and **closes at about 60 % of p. 288's RIGHT column at `…tormentorum fumus ascendat in saecula saeculorum. Amen.`, immediately above the centred `Cap. VII.` with its ONE-line subtitle `De gloria paradisi.`** ★ **That heading, read directly off the band, is what closes Cap. VI, and nothing else was used.** The index's hypothesis (Cap. VII at p. 288, therefore Cap. VI running 287–288) turns out right and **was used for nothing** — the sixth correct index opening in a row in this pars, which remains worth nothing. **The running heads were used for nothing**: p. 287's reads `PARS VII. C. VI.` although its whole left column and the head of its right column are still Cap. V, and p. 288's reads `BREVILOQUII PARS VII. C. VII.` although the whole leaf down to 60 % of its right column is still Cap. VI — **the running head running a unit AHEAD on six consecutive leaves now, and on seventeen of the last nineteen.** ★★ **AND CAP. VI SPRINGS THE SHARPEST FORM YET OF THE "NEVER FROM A GRAMMATICALLY COMPLETE TAIL" RULE: its tail is `Amen.`** — a doxological close, the most boundary-looking end any unit in this work can have — and it still proves nothing, because Cap. VII's own tail will have to be closed the same way, against whatever follows it. It is the heading below the `Amen.`, not the `Amen.`, that closed this chapter. The `title_la` is taken from the `Cap. VI.` heading itself, not from the volume index.

**Gutters — BOTH leaves measured fresh with no constant.**
- **★ p. 287 = 1163, RE-DERIVED rather than adopted, and `p7-c5`'s value confirmed exactly.** `colcrop.py vol5 287` with no constant returns **1160 on a 55 px run** — the same quiet sub-60 failure `p7-c5` rejected. Twelve windows from 20 % to 75 % agree **1162–1163 on 61–64 px runs**; the ink profile over body rows puts the band at **x = 1133–1193**, midpoint **1163**, with the heaviest centre rule met anywhere in this quire (x = 1158–1164, peaking 1127 rows) sitting **2 px left of the band centre**, which is precisely what dragged the default down. **1163 stands, and so does `p7-c5`'s diagnosis of why the default failed.**
- **★★ p. 288 = 1347, first measured here, AND IT IS THE WORST-BEHAVED LEAF OF THE PARS — step (3) of the three-step method was necessary and step (1) was not adoptable.** `colcrop.py vol5 288` with no constant returns **1348 on a 61 px run**, a run width that flags nothing. But of **fifteen** row windows swept at 15 % height, **eleven blow out to runs of 145–413 px** and only four survive on sound widths: 5–20 % → **1336/64**, 10–25 % → **1346/64**, 15–30 % → **1346/64**, 40–55 % → **1347/65**. **Four survivors spread over 11 px is not a consensus**, so the windows were abandoned for the per-column ink profile, which settles it outright: the left column's ink dies at **x = 1315**, the right column's resumes at **x = 1380**, so the zero band is **x = 1316–1379, 64 px**, midpoint **1347.5**. Standing inside it is the printed centre rule at **x = 1345–1350, peaking 166 rows** against a ~1-row floor — **moderately inked and almost exactly centred (rule centre 1347.5, band midpoint 1347.5)**, which is why the default's *value* is nearly right even though its *provenance* is worthless. **1347 is adopted.** ★ **The lesson this leaf adds: a sound-looking 61 px default run can sit on a page whose windows are in open disorder, and the run width alone would never have told you.** The band is broken into four sub-runs of ≤1 ink (1318–1328, 1333–1344, 1351–1367, 1370–1378) by faint speckle rather than by the rule; the rule itself is the only heavy island. **Print the profile even when the default looks healthy — here it is the only thing that could have decided the leaf.**
- ★ **Twenty-five consecutive leaves now measure 1150 · 1422 · 1163 · 1370 · 1186 · 1373 · 1202 · 1326 · 1164 · 1403 · 1145 · 1392 · 1247 · 1351 · 1191 · 1331 · 1231 · 1357 · 1169 · 1386 · 1234 · 1342 · 1163 · 1347. Parity predicts nothing, proximity predicts nothing** — p. 288 (even) at 1347 sits nowhere near p. 286's 1342 in any principled sense and 184 px from its own neighbour p. 287.

**Apparatus source.** Vol V's IA OCR renders footnote numerals as punctuation glyphs — anchor POSITIONS survive in the raw, numbers and footer-entry openers do NOT. **All ten notes here were read off the 450 dpi footer bands** (6 bands at 2.6× for the body and the registers, then direct crops of the original page at 4–5× per footer line and single-glyph crops at 11–16× for the disputed sorts); the counts are band-derived. `audit-apparatus-count` is blind to Vol V; `tools/check-vol5-apparatus.py` is the instrument. **p. 287's total of 9 was established by `bon-brev-p7-c5` and is re-confirmed here from the bands; p. 288's total of 6 is established here** and entered in `KNOWN_TOTALS`.

**★★ THE INCOMING HAND-OFF WAS A CLAIM AND IT WAS RE-DERIVED IN FULL — AND THIS TIME EVERY PARTICULAR HELD.** `bon-brev-p7-c5` forwarded p. 287's nn. 6–9 with the block structure and the verbatim text of all four verified, with the column of all four verified, and **explicitly claimed no anchor word and no digit in any of the four**. Verification level of every note **as established here**:
- **p. 287 n. 6** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, SIGLA all established here; no digit in the note.** Anchors on `et *gloria caelestis* ⁶.` in the **RIGHT** column, on the last word of Cap. VI's opening period.
- **p. 287 n. 7** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN and ALL FIVE DIGITS established here.** Anchors on `*fumus ascendat in saecula saeculorum* ⁷.` in the **RIGHT** column, closing *Thesis 3*.
- **p. 287 n. 8** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS and SIGLA established here.** Anchors on `nec *se negare* ⁸ nec suam` in the **RIGHT** column, inside the *Ratio*.
- **p. 287 n. 9** — text inherited; **ANCHOR, COLUMN, DIGITS and SIGLA established here.** Anchors on `usque ad ultimum quadrantem ⁹,` in the **RIGHT** column.
- **p. 288 nn. 1–6** — first-read here. POSITION, COLUMN, ANCHOR WORD, OWNERSHIP, EXTENT, DIGITS and SIGLA **all verified here.** n. 1 on `Primo igitur ¹ deordinationis`; n. 2 on `in suo perpetuo ² finem`; n. 3 on `et partiale ³ libidinose`; n. 4 on `*igne et sulphure* concremetur ⁴.` — **all four in p. 288's LEFT column**; n. 5 on `aliter comburitur lignum ⁵.`; n. 6 on `dictamen rationis rectae ⁶:` — **both in p. 288's RIGHT column. ALL SIX anchor inside Cap. VI**, and the four lines of Cap. VII printed beneath its heading on this leaf carry **no anchor at all**, so **nothing is forwarded from p. 288's footer to `bon-brev-p7-c7`.**

**★ p. 287's SPLIT MAP — re-confirmed, not re-derived from scratch.** Left block nn. 1–5 with **n. 5 straddling the gutter**, breaking off MID-WORD at `…in corp., ex qua quae-`; right block opens **UNNUMBERED** at `dam supra pag. 216, nota 3. — Post *seminalibus* P addit *rationibus*.`, then nn. 6, 7, 8, 9, ending complete at `…et pro *summa* D *divina*, M *sua*.` with blank paper beneath. **Anchors:** nn. 1–5 **LEFT**, nn. 6–9 **RIGHT**. **Total 9. Block 5/4, anchor 5/4, capitulum 5/4** — as `p7-c5` recorded, and its warning that the triple coincidence is a fact about that leaf and not a pattern is borne out one leaf later, where the three diverge again.

**★★ p. 288's SPLIT MAP.** Left footer block: nn. 1, 2, 3, 4 — **n. 4 straddling the gutter, breaking off at a COLON** after `… Soph. 1, 12:`, with a blank tail beneath and no printer's signature. Right footer block: n. 4's unnumbered continuation (`Visitabo super viros defixos in faecibus suis. Cfr. supra c. 2. — Superius pro *affligendus* K L O *puniendus*…`), then nn. 5, 6, ending complete at `…et pag. 224, nota 8.` with a very large blank tail. **Anchors:** nn. 1–4 **LEFT**; nn. 5–6 **RIGHT**. **Total 6. Block split 4/2, anchor split 4/2, capitulum split 6/0** — block and anchor coincide at the gutter while the capitulum boundary falls **below the whole register**, inside the right *column* but beneath its last anchor. ★ **A straddling note that breaks on a COLON, mid-citation between an abbreviation and the verse it introduces, is a break shape not previously met in this pars** — and it is exactly the shape that would read as a completed note if the lower side were not checked. It was checked.

**★ SIGLA — eleven runs across the two leaves, and the one-upright rule decides five of them.**
1. **`I K L O U V` (p. 287 nn. 6 and 9)** and **`I L O U V` (p. 288 n. 2)** — the leading sort stands on a **SINGLE upright** with top and foot serifs and is therefore `I`, never a crossbar-less `H`, which needs two; both runs ascend alphabetically, which corroborates. The raw prints `IKLOUV` and `I L 0 U V`, merging `O` to a zero.
2. **`B H` (p. 288 n. 1)** and **`G H` (p. 288 n. 2)** — here the sort *does* stand on **two uprights** with no crossbar, so it is `H`, and in both runs the alphabetical order (B→H, G→H) corroborates. The raw prints them `1!}|` and `G II`. ★ **The two rules are one rule applied twice: stroke count decides, and the run order confirms.**
3. **`E I K L O P` (p. 288 n. 3)** — six letters ascending; the second is a single upright, `I`. The raw prints `K I K L 0 P`, corrupting the opening `E` to `K` — **the band decides, and the ascending order proves the raw wrong**, since a run cannot open `K … K`.
4. **`G P et 2` (p. 288 n. 3)** — the raw prints `U P ct 2`; the band shows an unmistakable `G`. **A second raw siglum-letter corruption on the same leaf.**
5. **`F L M`, `A L M P V`, `T U`, `K L O`, `B E M` singleton runs and the singletons `M`, `P`, `D`, `F`** — all unambiguous and all ascending.
6. **EDITION sigla standing in the same registers as codex letters:** `Vat., 1 et 3` (p. 287 n. 8), `edd.` (p. 288 n. 1), `et 1` (p. 288 nn. 2 and 5), `et 2` (p. 288 nn. 3 and 5). ★ **The `et 1`s are the frozen trap and were settled at 16×: the glyph carries the flag-topped upper-left serif and narrow foot of the digit `1` of `nota 1.` on the same footer line, and lacks the full top-and-foot cross-serifs of the codex `I` printed four words away in `I L O U V`.** Both are edition 1.

**Digits settled off the band, each with something independent agreeing** (per the frozen rule). ★ **The `1`/`4` class dominates both leaves and the `3`/`5` class appears only once (`d. 50`); the same imbalance `p7-c5` found on pp. 286–287.**
- **★★ p. 287 n. 7's `Apoc. 14, 11.` — four glyphs, two `1`/`4` decisions, settled at 14× and then corroborated by the verse.** The first sort of each pair is a bare flag-topped upright with no diagonal; the second sort of the first pair carries the diagonal and mid-height bar of a `4`, the second sort of the second pair does not. So `14, 11` and not `11, 41`, `14, 44` or `11, 11`. **Apocalypse 14:11 is *et fumus tormentorum eorum ascendet in saecula saeculorum* — the exact words the anchor quotes**, which is the independent agreement the rule demands.
- **★★ p. 287 n. 7's `IV. Sent. d. 44. p. II. per totam et d. 50. p. II. a. 2. (de verme)` — both targets read, and both name themselves.** At 11× the two sorts of `44` both carry the `4`'s diagonal and bar; the `50` is unmistakable (`5` with flat top bar and bowl, `0` an oval). And the targets settle it decisively: `bon-sent-IV-d44-p2-*` is *Utrum sit infernus* / *Ubi sit infernus* / *Utrum ignis inferni sit verus ignis* / *Utrum puniens in inferno sit solus ignis* / *Utrum ignis inferni consumat corpora damnatorum* / *Utrum ignis inferni affligat spiritum* ✓ — **this chapter's Theses 1 and 2, question for question** — and `bon-sent-IV-d50-p2-a2-*` is *Utrum damnati habeant vermem materialem* / *Utrum et qua ratione in damnatis sit vermis spiritualis* / *Utrum vermis ille sit invariabilis* ✓, **which is what the note's own parenthesis `(de verme)` says it is.** `d. 41`, `d. 14` and `d. 30` name nothing of the kind.
- **★ p. 287 n. 8's `II. Tim. 2, 13` and n. 9's `Matth. 5, 26` — both settled by the verses the notes themselves print**, verbatim Vulgate (`Negare se ipsum non potest`; `Non exies inde, donec reddas novissimum quadrantem`) ✓, and both matching their anchors (`nec se negare`; `usque ad ultimum quadrantem`).
- **★ p. 287 n. 9's `supra pag. 224, nota 8.` — read unambiguously at 9×, and corroborated one leaf later**, since p. 288 n. 6 sends the reader to the same `pag. 224, nota 8.` The two independent occurrences agree.
- **★★ p. 288 n. 4's `Apoc. 14, 10` and `Soph. 1, 12` — settled by the verses the note prints and by nothing else being possible.** Apocalypse 14:10 is *cruciabitur igne et sulphure* ✓ and Sophonias 1:12 is *visitabo super viros defixos in faecibus suis* ✓ — **the second is the clause the note's own gutter continuation carries**, so the straddling note settles its own digits from either side of the gutter. ★ **And `Apoc. 14, 10` on p. 288 stands against `Apoc. 14, 11` on p. 287: the same chapter, adjacent verses, on facing leaves — each confirming the other's `14`.**
- **★★ p. 288 n. 5's `I. Cor. 3, 12. seqq.` — settled by the anchor.** I Cor. 3:12–15 is the *ligna, faenum, stipulam* passage and the fire that tries every man's work; the anchor is `sicut ab eodem igne aliter uritur palea, et aliter comburitur lignum` ✓ — straw and wood, in that order, from that verse.
- **★★ p. 288 n. 5's `II. Sent. d. 31. a. 2. q. 3.` — a `1`/`4` decision in `31` settled DECISIVELY by reading the target.** `bon-sent-II-d31-a2-q3` is *Utrum caro inficiatur ex propagatione tantum, vel ex propagatione et libidine* ✓ — **the *libido* question**, which is exactly what the note sends the reader to, against a lemma about `maculae ex improbitate libidinis procedentis`. `d. 34` and `d. 3` name nothing of the kind.
- **★ p. 288 n. 2's `tom. IV. pag. 922, nota 1.` and n. 6's `pag. 180, nota 6.`** — both read unambiguously at 4–5×. Vol IV p. 922 falls inside d. 44 p. II, the very distinction n. 7 of the facing leaf has just named for this chapter; Vol V p. 180 falls in *De perfectione evangelica*, a work of this tome not yet translated, so `build-citations.py` will class it **forward, not dangling** — expected behaviour.
- **★ p. 288 n. 3's `et 2` twice and n. 1's `edd.`** — edition sigla, not codex letters; see the sigla list above.

**Runover tests — TWO RUN, ONE POSITIVE, ONE NEGATIVE, each closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter, p. 288's own — **POSITIVE**, logged as `p.288 n.4:gutter`.* p. 288's left footer block ends at n. 4's `… Soph. 1, 12:` — **on a colon, mid-citation, with the verse it introduces still to come** — with a blank tail beneath and no printer's signature; and p. 288's right block opens **UNNUMBERED** at `Visitabo super viros defixos in faecibus suis. Cfr. supra c. 2. — Superius pro *affligendus* K L O *puniendus*…`, before n. 5's numbered `Cfr. I. Cor. 3, 12. seqq.` **The note is rendered JOINED in the apparatus above.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 287 → p. 288 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 287's right block ends **complete** at n. 9's `…et pro *summa* D *divina*, M *sua*.` with blank paper beneath and no printer's signature (the upper side, read by `p7-c5` and re-read here); and **p. 288's left block opens NUMBERED** at `¹ B H addunt *ratione*.` Nothing logged. ★ **This is the crossing `p7-c5` deliberately left to this chunk, and it is closed here.**
- *NOT run here, and forwarded:* the **p. 288 → p. 289 page-crossing**. p. 288's right block ends complete at n. 6's `Vide supra pag. 180, nota 6. et pag. 224, nota 8.` with a very large blank tail and no printer's signature, so the upper side is done; but p. 289 is off this chunk's leaves. **The test is `bon-brev-p7-c7`'s to close from both sides**, together with p. 289's own gutter test and everything beyond.
- *NOT re-logged here, and NOT re-run:* **p. 287's own gutter test** (`p7-c5`, POSITIVE, logged as `p.287 n.5:gutter`) and the **p. 286 → p. 287 page-crossing** (`p7-c5`, NEGATIVE); `p.285 n.4:gutter` and `p.286 n.4:gutter` (both `p7-c4`, both POSITIVE) and the p. 285 → p. 286 test (`p7-c4`, NEGATIVE); p. 284's own gutter test and the p. 284 → p. 285 test (both `p7-c3`, both NEGATIVE); `p.283 n.4:gutter` (`p7-c2`, POSITIVE) and the p. 283 → p. 284 test (`p7-c2`, NEGATIVE); `p.281 n.3:gutter` and `p.282 n.4:gutter` (both `p7-c1`, both POSITIVE), the p. 281 → p. 282 and p. 282 → p. 283 tests (both `p7-c1`, both NEGATIVE); the p. 280 → p. 281 test, p. 280's own gutter test and the p. 279 → p. 280 test (all three `p6-c13`, all NEGATIVE); `p.279 n.3:gutter`, `p.278 n.2:gutter`, `p.277 n.7:page` (all three `p6-c12`, all POSITIVE) and the p. 278 → p. 279 test (`p6-c12`, NEGATIVE); p. 277's own gutter test and the p. 276 → p. 277 test (both `p6-c11`, both NEGATIVE); `p.276 n.3:gutter` and the p. 275 → p. 276 test (both `p6-c10`); `p.274 n.5:gutter`, `p.275 n.4:gutter`, the p. 273 → p. 274 and p. 274 → p. 275 tests (all four `p6-c9`); `p.273 n.5:gutter` and the p. 272 → p. 273 test (both `p6-c8`); `p.272 n.5:gutter` and the p. 271 → p. 272 test (both `p6-c7`); `p.270 n.4:gutter`, the p. 270 → p. 271 test and p. 271's own gutter test (all three `p6-c6`); `p.269 n.4:gutter` and the p. 269 → p. 270 test (both `p6-c5`); `p.268 n.4:gutter` and the p. 268 → p. 269 test (both `p6-c4`); `p.267 n.4:gutter` and the p. 267 → p. 268 test (both `p6-c3`); `p.266 n.3:gutter` and the p. 266 → p. 267 test (both `p6-c2`); p. 265's own gutter test and the p. 265 → p. 266 test (both `p6-c1`); the p. 264 → p. 265 test, p. 264's own gutter test and the p. 263 → p. 264 test (all `p5-c10`); and everything on the earlier do-not-re-log lists. Corpus-wide runover and chunk totals are **not written here** — derive them with `tools/check-vol5-census.py`.

**★ THE PRINTER'S SIGNATURE — DUE AROUND p. 289 AND STILL NOT MET.** Neither p. 287 nor p. 288 carries `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` or a quire number; all four column feet were checked at 2.6× and again by direct crop, and all four are blank paper. (p. 287's feet were also checked by `p7-c5`.) The eight-leaf cadence puts quire 34 on p. 265, quire 35 on p. 273 and quire 36 on p. 281, so **quire 37 is due on p. 289 — the very next leaf, and squarely inside `bon-brev-p7-c7`.** Nothing of the kind was transcribed into the apparatus here, and no note's foot was mistaken for one.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order; glosses stand in the outer margin of each column): p. 287 right column — "Thesis 1." — "Thesis 2." — "Thesis 3." — "Ratio." — "Principia generalia."; p. 288 left column — "Deordinatio et poena triplex." — "Pro thesi 1." — "Poena perpetua." — "In loco infimo." — "Pro thesi 2." — "In igne et sulphure."; p. 288 right column — "Gradu diverso." — "Semper urit non consumit." — "Pro thesi 3." — "Poena damni, ignis et vermis." (p. 288's right column carries one further gloss, "Thesis 1.", but it stands beside the first line of **Cap. VII** and belongs to `bon-brev-p7-c7`, not here.) ★ **Fifteen glosses, and Cap. VI is the FIFTEENTH distinct form in fifteen consecutive chapters.** Like Cap. V it runs three theses and a double series, but the two are not the same shape: Cap. V headed its reasons `Rationes 3 pro thesi 1.` and discharged them `Arguitur ex 1. ratione.` / `Item, ex 2. ratione.` / `Item, ex ratione 3. pro thesi 3.`, whereas **Cap. VI has no reason-series header at all, writes `Principia generalia.` where Cap. V wrote the bare `Principia.`, and discharges by a plain `Pro thesi 1.` / `Pro thesi 2.` / `Pro thesi 3.` in strict order** — while interleaving content glosses (`Poena perpetua.`, `In loco infimo.`, `In igne et sulphure.`, `Gradu diverso.`, `Semper urit non consumit.`, `Poena damni, ignis et vermis.`) and opening with a structural one (`Deordinatio et poena triplex.`) that no previous chapter has used. ★ **Infer NOTHING from it; fifteen chapters, fifteen forms.** ★ **The `Thesis N.` and `Pro thesi N.` numerals are all `1`/`4` decisions settled by the SERIES** — there are exactly three theses, `2` and `3` print unambiguously in both series, so the opening member of each can only be 1. ★ **On these two leaves the raw does NOT corrupt a gloss digit** (it prints `Thesis i.`, `Thesis 2.`, `TneBis 3.`, `Baiio.`, `Princinia`), which is the opposite of what it did to p. 286's `Pro ihcsi 3.` — **the margin's grade moves leaf to leaf like every other region's, and one leaf's verdict predicts nothing.**

**Raw-quality grade, per page, per region and per column-run** (the raw was a cross-check only, never the base). **p. 287 right-column body — moderate**, the chronic bracket-and-ligature class confined to single letters (`allligentur`, `Humsmodi`, `variet;ite`, `saecuta`, `severiUitis`, `circum.stantias`, `;ij) iinpiis`, `iuslitiae`); **p. 287 footer — moderate**, reproducing `d. 44. p. II.`, `d. 18. a. 1. q. 2.`, `pag. 216`, `pag. 224` and `Matth.`'s verse correctly and failing only on `.'iO` for `50` and `S, 26` for `5, 26`; **p. 287 margin — good** (three theses plus `Baiio.`/`Princinia`, all recoverable). **p. 288 left-column body — moderate and even** (`dejjet`, `necessc`, `acerhitale`, `multiformilate`, `veliet`, `iwena`, `fmem`, `lial)eat`, `[ler`, `nmc`); **p. 288 right-column body — MODERATE BUT WORSE THAN THE LEFT**, the bracket class becoming continuous (`consiiiiiil`, `sein[ier`, `mnlti[ilicationem`, `[)acis`, `[iertiirbatioiieih`, `adem[)tio`, `[)oena`) and **one substantive error: it prints `divino impeiio ordinanti` where the band prints `divino imperio ordinante,`** — the band wins, and **n. 5 corroborates it independently by recording `Inferius pro *ordinante* M *moderante*`, which presupposes the lemma `ordinante`.** **p. 288 footer — moderate on digits and BAD ON SIGLA**, reproducing `922`, `180`, `224`, `14, 10`, `3,12`, `d. 31. a. 2. q. 3.` and both scriptural verses correctly while corrupting **three siglum letters in three consecutive notes** (`1!}|` for `B H`, `U P` for `G P`, `K I K L 0 P` for `E I K L O P`). **p. 288 margin — good.** ★ **So on p. 288 the footer graded better than the body on digits and worse on letters, and the body graded worse on the right than on the left. Give body, footer AND margin separate verdicts, and grade per column-run — the page-level verdict was again not the region-level one.**

**⚠ NO NEW `[?]` FLAG IS RAISED HERE.** Nothing on the two leaves was found to be ambiguous after the band work. The place where raw and band disagree substantively (`ordinanti` against `ordinante`) is settled by the band and by the note that lemmatises the word, and is not a flag. `(F *novissimum quadrantem*)` in p. 287 n. 9 records F's reading in the same words as the text, which looks like a null variant; **it is transcribed exactly as printed and is deliberately NOT flagged**, on the standing rule that Quaracchi is never silently emended and that an editor's own compression is not our defect to repair.

**⚠ THREE INHERITED `[?]` FLAGS TRAVEL FORWARD, NONE RESOLVED, NONE RE-FLAGGED.**
1. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 271 n. 2, `E F G H minus, aptae ponunt et`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c6`). **p. 271 is off this chunk's leaves entirely.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c7` unchanged.
2. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 272 n. 6, `Respicitur Col. 6, 12.`** (owned by `bon-brev-p6-c7`). Colossians still has four chapters and the sense still requires Ephes. 6:12; **no disposition is recorded, and `build-citations.py`'s QA line on it remains expected behaviour, not a defect.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c7`.
3. **INHERITED, UNRESOLVED, FORWARDED — p. 282 n. 4's lemma `Pro *quibus sufficienter purgatis*` against the body's `expurgatis`** (raised and owned by `bon-brev-p7-c2`). **p. 282 is off this chunk's leaves and this chunk brings nothing new to it.** Forwarded to `bon-brev-p7-c7`.
★ **Flags that are DISCHARGED or CLOSED and are NOT resurrected here: `p6-c10`'s `d. 23.`, the `c. 13.` flag on p. 277 n. 7, and p. 280 n. 6's `homo non separe`.** ★ **And two readings that are NOT flags and must not be "fixed": p. 284's `de Cura pro mortuis agenda` for the received *gerenda* (Cap. III's text, transcribed as printed by `p7-c3`), and the faded scan streak on p. 283's right column, which is photographic and has six determinate readings.** ★ **One QA line that is not a defect: `bon-brev-p6-c8`'s `apparatus:p273-6` dangling `tom. I. pag. 155` is GALLAND's *Bibliotheca*, a parser limitation.**

**Register — the INFERNAL-PUNISHMENT vocabulary was CONSULTED from Vol IV and FOLLOWED, not innovated; the eschatological, purgatorial, suffrages, conflagration, world-renewal and resurrection settlements from `p7-c1` through `p7-c5` are carried unchanged.** ★ **The apparatus named its own targets and they were read.** **Vol IV chunks consulted:** **`bon-sent-IV-d44-p2-a1-q1`, `a1-q2`, `a2-q1`, `a2-q2`, `a3-q1`, `a3-q2`** — hell, its place, the truth and mode of its fire, and whether that fire consumes the bodies and afflicts the spirit: p. 287 n. 7's first target, taken *per totam* as the note directs, and the source of Theses 1 and 2 question for question; **`bon-sent-IV-d50-p2-a2-q1`, `a2-q2`, `a2-q3`** — the material worm, the spiritual worm and its unchangeableness: p. 287 n. 7's second target, `(de verme)`, and the source of Thesis 3's *poena vermis*; and, more briefly, **`bon-sent-IV-d50-p2-a1-q1`** for the separated spirit's suffering and **`bon-sent-IV-d44-p2-a3-q2`** again (already worked by `p7-c2`) for *poena damni*. **Carried from that settlement, not re-decided:** ***poena damni* → "the punishment of loss"** and with it ***carentia visionis Dei* → "the lack of the vision of God"**, on d. 44 p. II a. 3 q. 2's own pairing of *poena damni* with *carentia beatitudinis aeternae* → "the lack of eternal beatitude"; ***vermis* → "the worm"** throughout, never "the gnawing worm", as d. 50 p. II a. 2 sets it; ***ignis infernalis* → "the fire of hell"** with ***infernalis* → "infernal"** where the adjective stands alone, both from `p7-c4`'s conflagration settlement; ***locus infimus* → "the lowest place"**, d. 44 p. II a. 1 q. 2's controlling phrase; ***faeces* → "dregs"**, kept audibly apart from *scoria* → "dross" exactly as `p7-c4` fixed them; ***reprobi* → "the reprobate"** and ***damnati* → "the damned"**, kept as two words for two words; ***acerbitas* → "bitterness"**, `p7-c2`'s rendering, and ***acerbe* → "bitterly"** with it; ***deordinatio* → "disordering"** and ***deordinatus* → "disordered"**, Pars III's own renderings, against ***inordinatus* → "inordinate"**, the pair kept distinct because this chapter's last period sets *deordinata aversio* and *inordinata conversio* one clause apart; ***dedecus peccati / decus iustitiae* → "the disgrace of sin / the comeliness of justice"**, printed as Pars III p. 234 prints the same antithesis. **Fixed here for this capitulum:** *interminabilitas* → "endlessness", kept a noun of the same shape as *varietas* → "variety" and *acerbitas* → "bitterness", because the three are chained (*varietas … cum varietate acerbitas … cum acerbitate interminabilitas*) and the chain is the argument; *multiformitas* → "multiformity" against *multimodus* → "manifold", the two deliberately not levelled since the *multimoda* thesis is answered by a *multiformitas* of punishment; *rectissimum* → "most right" against *rectitudo* → "rectitude", kept cognate because the *sua rectitudine exigente* clause depends on hearing the same root; *impoenitentia finalis* → "final impenitence"; *quantitas culpae* → "the quantity of the fault" and *circumstantiae aggravantes* → "aggravating circumstances"; *carentia finis* → "a lack of any end", audibly the same *carentia* as the *carentia visionis Dei* that closes the chapter; *intensione / duratione* → "in intensity / in duration"; *susceptio poenitentiae* → "acceptance of repentance"; *ut nunc et partiale* → "as of now and partial", left in that order because the note records codices omitting *et ut nunc* as a unit; *vilitas et nihilitas peccati* → "the vileness and nothingness of sin", the coinage *nihilitas* rendered by a coinage; *ademptio / ademptae pacis continuatio* → "a taking away / the continuation of a peace already taken away", kept cognate because the sentence turns on there being no *new* taking away; *poena incendii materialis* → "the punishment of material burning"; *pugna voluntatis et rationis* → "the war of will and reason"; and Apocalypse 14:11's *tormentorum fumus ascendat in saecula saeculorum* → "the smoke of their torments may ascend for ever and ever" (Douay), printed identically at both its occurrences because Bonaventure repeats it to close the chapter he opened it with. Quaracchi's em-dash articulations are preserved throughout, and Bonaventure's *quia/cum/ideo* chains are kept as one English sentence — the *Ratio* period (which runs unbroken across the p. 287 → p. 288 page break), and the *Primo igitur*, *Rursus* and *Postremo* periods.

method: LLM-assisted translation from the Quaracchi Latin, verified chunk-by-chunk against the printed plates (apparatus roster, cross-references, page/gutter boundaries).

license_source: Public Domain Mark 1.0

license_translation: CC BY-NC 4.0

license_apparatus: CC BY-NC 4.0