title: Pars 3, Cap. 10

source_text:
<!-- page 238 -->

### Capitulum X. *De origine et qualitate peccatorum poenalium.*

De peccatis autem *poenalibus* hoc tenendum est, quod licet malum culpae et malum poenae sint diversae malorum differentiae; quaedam tamen sic sunt *peccata*, quod etiam sunt *poena*[^p238-8] peccati. *Speciali* namque modo *peccata* et *poenae peccati* dicuntur illa quae habent adiunctum dolorem et moestitiam, sicut invidia, accidia et consimilia. — *Minus specialiter* dicuntur illa quae habent adiunctam vel meram depravationem naturae, vel ignominiam, sicut sunt illa, quantum ad quae dicitur peccator *tradi in reprobum sensum*[^p239-1]. — *Generaliter* autem peccata, quae « sunt inter primam apostasiam et ultimam poenam gehennae, et *peccata* dici possunt et *poena* peccati[^p239-2] », iuxta quod dicit Gregorius, crimina criminibus vindicari. — Licet autem idem dicatur *peccatum* et *poena* peccati, tenendum tamen est, quod omnis poena in quantum *poena* iusta est et a Deo; nulla vero *culpa* iusta nec a Deo, sed tantum a libero voluntatis arbitrio. — Poena vero, quae mere poena est, a Deo est inflicta; quae vero est *culpa*, vel inclinans ad culpam est *contracta*, vel *acta*[^p239-3].

<!-- page 239 -->

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum malum dicat recessum a primo principio, per hoc quod nocet bono; non autem nocet bono nisi aliquid adimendo de bono; bonum autem consistit in modo, specie et ordine: nullum est malum, quod non sit corruptivum modi, speciei et ordinis[^p239-4]. Ordo autem duplex est, scilicet ordo *naturae* et ordo *iustitiae*. Ordo *naturae* est in bono *naturali*, ordo *iustitiae* in bono *morali*; et quia bonum *naturale* est in omni natura, bonum *morale* in voluntate habet consistere: ideo ordo *naturae* est in omni natura, ordo vero *iustitiae* in voluntate electiva consistit. Et quia *voluntas* « est instrumentum se ipsum movens[^p239-5] », *natura* vero minime; hinc est, quod ordo *iustitiae* est ordo non tantum *factus*, sed etiam *factivus*; ordo vero *naturae* est ordo *factus*. Quoniam ergo malum privare potest ordinem *iustitiae* et ordinem *naturae*; hinc est, quod duplex est malum, scilicet *culpae* et *poenae*.

Rursus, quia ordo *iustitiae* est ordo voluntarius; hinc est, quod « malum *culpae* est affectio voluntaria, malum autem *poenae* est affectio involuntaria[^p239-6] ».

Postremo, quia ordo *iustitiae*, qui est in voluntate, est ordo *factivus*; ideo « malum culpae, quod est eius privatio, est malum, quod facimus, et malum poenae est malum, quod patimur ». Et quia passio non est, nisi naturaliter praecedat actio; nec actio, ad quam non sequatur aliqua passio[^p239-7]: hinc est, quod nulla est *poena* sine praecedente merito *culpae*, nulla est etiam *culpa*, quin comitetur aliqua *poena*.

Et quoniam quod facimus a nobis est, quod patimur potest esse a nobis et ab aliis, utpote a causa superiori, vel inferiori: ideo, licet omnis *culpa* sit a nobis, non tamen omnis *poena* est a nobis, immo quaedam a nobis *acta*, quaedam *inflicta*, quaedam *contracta*.

Et quia cum qui facit quod non debet, iustum est pati quod debet; ideo omnis poena in quantum poena iusta est et a divina providentia, quia ordinata ad culpam et ipsius culpae ordinativa.

Quia vero passio illa potest esse per ademptionem boni *naturalis*, vel boni *moralis* cum naturali; hinc est, quod quaedam poena est *mere poena*, quaedam vero est *poena et culpa*; quia bonum *morale*, quod est iustitia, non adimitur nisi per iniustitiam, quae est culpa. — Prima igitur poena est a Deo et secundum quod *poena*, et secundum id quod *est*: a Deo, inquam, non *instituente*, sed *vindicante*. Secunda vero, cum sit culpa, secundum id quod *est*[^p239-8], a Deo non est, sed solum quantum ad *ordinem*. Ipsa vero vel est *acta*, si sequatur ad actuale, vel est *contracta*, si sequatur ad originale.

Si ergo proprie accipiatur malum, secundum quod est privatio boni naturalis et affectio involuntaria et malum, quod patimur; sic non coincidit cum malo *culpae* in idem, licet sit annexum eidem. Si autem accipiatur *large*, ut dicatur malum, quod patimur sive a nobis, sive aliunde, sive in natura, sive in voluntate; sic coincidunt *in idem*, sed non *ad idem*, vel *secundum idem*: quia quod est *culpa* in se dicitur praecedentis[^p239-9] *poena*; vel: *culpa* ratione *actionis* dicitur esse *poena* ratione *passionis*. — Et sic patet, quomodo, pro quanto et quare aliquid simul dicatur *peccatum* et *poena peccati*.

---

english:
### Chapter X. *On the origin and quality of the penal sins.*

Concerning the *penal* sins this is to be held: that although the evil of fault and the evil of penalty are diverse differentiae of evils, some things are nevertheless *sins* in such a way that they are also the *penalty*[^p238-8] of sin. For in a *special* way those things are called *sins* and *penalties of sin* which have sorrow and sadness joined to them, such as envy, sloth and the like. — *Less specially* are called those which have joined to them either the mere depravation of nature, or ignominy — such as those things in respect of which a sinner is said to be *handed over to a reprobate sense*[^p239-1]. — But *generally* are so called the sins which "are between the first apostasy and the last penalty of hell, and can be called both *sins* and the *penalty* of sin[^p239-2]," according to what Gregory says: that crimes are avenged by crimes. — But although *sin* and the *penalty* of sin are called the same, it must nevertheless be held that every penalty, inasmuch as it is a *penalty*, is just and from God; but no *fault* is just, nor from God, but only from the free choice of the will. — And a penalty which is merely a penalty is *inflicted* by God; but the one which is a *fault*, or which inclines to fault, is either *contracted* or *enacted*[^p239-3].

<!-- page 239 -->

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since evil bespeaks a withdrawal from the first principle through this, that it harms a good; and it does not harm a good except by taking something away from the good; and a good consists in mode, species and order: there is no evil which is not destructive of mode, species and order[^p239-4]. But order is twofold, namely the order of *nature* and the order of *justice*. The order of *nature* is in the *natural* good, the order of *justice* in the *moral* good; and because the *natural* good is in every nature, while the *moral* good has to consist in the will: therefore the order of *nature* is in every nature, but the order of *justice* consists in the elective will. And because the *will* "is an instrument moving itself[^p239-5]," but *nature* is by no means such; hence it is that the order of *justice* is an order not only *made* but also *making*; whereas the order of *nature* is an order *made*. Since therefore evil can deprive of the order of *justice* and of the order of *nature*; hence it is that evil is twofold, namely of *fault* and of *penalty*.

Again, because the order of *justice* is a voluntary order; hence it is that "the evil of *fault* is a voluntary affection, but the evil of *penalty* is an involuntary affection[^p239-6]."

Lastly, because the order of *justice*, which is in the will, is a *making* order; therefore "the evil of fault, which is the privation of it, is the evil which we do, and the evil of penalty is the evil which we suffer." And because there is no passion unless naturally an action precede; nor is there an action upon which some passion does not follow[^p239-7]: hence it is that there is no *penalty* without a preceding merit of *fault*, and there is also no *fault* which some *penalty* does not accompany.

And since what we do is from ourselves, while what we suffer can be from ourselves and from others — as, for instance, from a higher or a lower cause: therefore, although every *fault* is from ourselves, not every *penalty* is from ourselves; rather, some is *enacted* by us, some *inflicted*, some *contracted*.

And because it is just that he who does what he ought not should suffer what he ought; therefore every penalty, inasmuch as it is a penalty, is just and from divine providence, because it is ordained to the fault and is ordinative of the fault itself.

But because that passion can be through the taking away of a *natural* good, or of a *moral* good together with the natural; hence it is that some penalty is *merely a penalty*, but some is *penalty and fault*; because the *moral* good, which is justice, is not taken away except through injustice, which is fault. — The first penalty, therefore, is from God both according as it is a *penalty* and according to that which it *is*: from God, I say, not as *instituting* but as *avenging*. But the second, since it is a fault, is not from God according to that which it *is*[^p239-8], but only as regards its *order*. And it is either *enacted*, if it follow upon the actual, or *contracted*, if it follow upon the original.

If, therefore, evil be taken properly, according as it is the privation of a natural good and an involuntary affection and the evil which we suffer; then it does not coincide with the evil of *fault* in one and the same thing, although it is annexed to it. But if it be taken *broadly*, so that whatever we suffer be called evil — whether from ourselves or from elsewhere, whether in nature or in the will — then they coincide *in the same thing*, but not *toward the same*, nor *according to the same*: because what is *fault* in itself is called the *penalty*[^p239-9] of a preceding one; or: *fault* by reason of *action* is said to be *penalty* by reason of *passion*. — And thus it is clear how, to what extent, and why one and the same thing may be called both *sin* and the *penalty of sin*.

---

en: The editions, except edition 2, together with a few codices, have *poenae*.

la: Rom. 1, 28: *Tradidit illos Deus in reprobum sensum, ut faciant ea quae non conveniunt*. Cfr. ibid. v. 24. et 26, ubi dicitur, quod « tradidit illos Deus in desideria cordis eorum, in immunditiam » et « in passiones ignominiae ». — Pro *ignominiam* I P et 2 *ignorantiam*, aliae edd. *ignominiam vel ignorantiam*.

en: Rom. 1:28: *God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient*. Cf. ibid. vv. 24 and 26, where it is said that "God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness" and "unto passions of ignominy." — For *ignominiam*, I P and edition 2 have *ignorantiam*; the other editions, *ignominiam vel ignorantiam*.

la: His verbis complectitur Magister in II. Sent. d. XXXVI. c. 1. sententiam August., Enarrat. in Ps. 57, 9. n. 18. Ibid. c. 1. et 3. habetur etiam sententia Gregorii, quae, si *verba* attenduntur, ab August., I. contra Adversarium Legis et Prophet. c. 24. n. 51, exhibetur in exponendo praenotatum verbum Apostoli (Rom. 1, 26: *Tradidit illos Deus in passiones ignominiae*): « ut crimina criminibus vindicarentur ».

en: In these words the Master, in II *Sent.*, d. XXXVI, c. 1, embraces the opinion of Augustine, *Expositions on the Psalms* 57:9, n. 18. In the same place, cc. 1 and 3, there is also found the opinion of Gregory, which — if the *wording* is attended to — is presented by Augustine, *Against an Adversary of the Law and the Prophets* I, c. 24, n. 51, in expounding the aforenoted word of the Apostle (Rom. 1:26: *God delivered them up to passions of ignominy*): "that crimes might be avenged by crimes."

la: Vide tom. II. pag. 826, nota 4. de hac poenae distinctione verba Praepositivi. — Materia huius cap. exponitur II. Sent. d. 36. per totam. — Superius fide S posuimus *libero* pro *liberae*.

en: See tom. II, p. 826, note 4, for Praepositinus's words on this distinction of penalty. — The matter of this chapter is expounded in II *Sent.*, d. 36, throughout. — Above, on the faith of S, we have put *libero* for *liberae*.

la: Cfr. supra c. 1., et II. Sent. d. 35. per totam, ubi etiam (praecipue a. 2. q. 1.) quae sequuntur fusius declarantur. — Inferius non pauci codd. omittunt *habet consistere*, et pro *consistit*, quod praebent A S et 2, alii codd. et edd. ponunt *habet consistere*.

en: Cf. above, c. 1, and II *Sent.*, d. 35, throughout, where also (especially a. 2, q. 1) what follows is set out more fully. — Below, not a few codices omit *habet consistere*, and for *consistit*, which A S and edition 2 give, the other codices and the editions put *habet consistere*.

la: Ut dicit Anselm., de Concord. grat. et lib. arb. q. 3. c. 11.

en: As Anselm says, *On the Concord of Grace and Free Choice*, q. 3, c. 11.

la: Secundum August., III. de Lib. Arb. c. 9. n. 26. Cfr. tom. II. pag. 825, nota 4. Ibid. nota 3. seq. ipsius sententia seq. ex I. de Lib. Arb. c. 1. n. 1. habetur. — Mox voci *factivus* A praemittit *activus sive*.

en: According to Augustine, *On Free Choice of the Will* III, c. 9, n. 26. Cf. tom. II, p. 825, note 4. In the same place, note 3, the following opinion of his is taken from *On Free Choice of the Will* I, c. 1, n. 1. — Shortly after, before the word *factivus* A places *activus sive*.

la: Gilbert. Porret., de Sex Princip. c. *de Actione*: Omnis enim actio passionis est effectiva, et omne passionem inferens actio est. — Inferius pro *quin* A C E H *quam non*.

en: Gilbert de la Porrée, *On the Six Principles*, the chapter *On Action*: "For every action is productive of passion, and everything inflicting passion is an action." — Below, for *quin*, A C E H have *quam non*.

la: Edd., excepta 2, cum aliquot codd. *quod culpa est*. Pro *vindicante* H M O Q et 2 *iudicante*. Mox pro *sed solum* edd. cum uno alteroque cod. *nisi solum*.

en: The editions, except edition 2, together with some codices, have *quod culpa est*. For *vindicante*, H M O Q and edition 2 have *iudicante*. Shortly after, for *sed solum*, the editions together with one or another codex have *nisi solum*.

la: Edd., excepta 2, *dicitur respectu praecedentis culpae*.

en: The editions, except edition 2, read *dicitur respectu praecedentis culpae*. ---

translators_notes:
**Page span, established positively at both ends.** Cap. X opens **part-way down p. 238's RIGHT column**, under `Cap. X. / De origine et qualitate peccatorum poenalium.`, immediately below Cap. IX's close (`…ex quibus alia manant quam plurima.`) — the same right column, on the band. Its first paragraph runs to the **foot of that column**, breaking at a **word boundary** (`…quod etiam sunt poena⁸ peccati. Speciali` / `namque modo peccata et poenae peccati dicuntur…` at the head of p. 239's LEFT column). It then fills p. 239's left column, crosses that page's gutter mid-word inside the *Postremo* paragraph (`…ideo « malum culpae,` / `quod est eius privatio, est malum, quod facimus…`), and **closes part-way down p. 239's RIGHT column** at `…aliquid simul dicatur peccatum et poena peccati.` **That end is fixed POSITIVELY and only from the `Cap. XI. / De origine peccatorum finalium, quae sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum.` heading, which stands at the HEAD of p. 240's LEFT column**, directly under the running head — p. 240 was extracted and banded for this purpose alone. **No inference was drawn from the white space that stands below Cap. X's last line at the foot of p. 239's right column** — that space is exactly the artefact of a nine-note footer register expanding upward which `bon-brev-p2-c4` was written short on. Cap. X claims no text on p. 237 and none on p. 240.

**★ CAP. XI OPENS A PAGE — the first Pars III capitulum to do so since Cap. I opened p. 231.** Every chapter boundary in Capp. II–X has fallen inside a column. c11's span therefore begins cleanly at the top of p. 240's left column, with no incoming body-text seam to reconstruct — but that says nothing about its footer, which must still be read from n. 1 off the bands.

**★ THE PAGE MARKER MOVED DOWN AGAIN — third consecutive chunk.** The p. 238/239 break falls inside this chunk's **first** paragraph (at the word boundary `Speciali` / `namque`), so `<!-- page 239 -->` is placed at the nearest paragraph boundary **below** (before `Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum…`) and the true break recorded here. As `bon-brev-p3-c9` predicted, for a capitulum that opens low on a page this is now the standing case, not a branch. **Note also that this chunk's true p. 238/239 break is at a WORD boundary, not mid-word** — c9's break was mid-word (`capi-`/`talia`); one leaf later the same layout yields a clean word break. The mid-word case is not a property of the page shape.

**Gutter.** **p. 238 = 1338** and **p. 239 = 1200** (both already auto-measured by `bon-brev-p3-c9`, both re-used and confirmed visually on the bands read here). **p. 240 was extracted and measured fresh.** `colcrop.py vol5 240` with no constant returned **split_x = 1362 with a 13 px low-ink run** and the tool's own **⚠ WEAK RUN** flag — a FAILED measurement, per the standing rule, and it must not be used. Re-measuring over narrower row windows: rows 45–92 %, 50–85 % and 55–80 % all return the same failed 1362/13 px; rows 30–70 % return **1338 / 60 px**, rows 20–60 % **1338 / 63 px**, rows 15–45 % **1337 / 64 px**. **p. 240 = 1338**, confirmed visually on the re-cropped bands. **★ THE CAUSE IS NEW AND WILL RECUR: on p. 240 the marginal glosses sit in the GUTTER, not the outer margin** (`Thesis 1.`, `Thesis 2.`, `Thesis 3.`, `Ratio.`, `Pro thesi 1.` all print to the LEFT of the left column's text on p. 239, but on p. 240 the gloss column for the RIGHT column of type falls into the inter-column space). The glosses put ink into the low rows of the gutter and choke the blank run there, while the upper body rows stay clean — which is why the default 45–92 % window fails and a 20–60 % window succeeds. **When `colcrop` flags a weak run on a Vol V page, try moving the window UP before assuming a display heading.** The running series is now 1194 · 1337 · 1211 · 1341 · 1210 · 1331 · 1209 · 1338 · 1200 · **1338** — p. 240 lands exactly on p. 238's value, but **parity stays spent; no page may inherit a neighbour's value.**

**Raw-quality verdict, per page AND per region AND per column-run.**
- **p. 238, right column, Cap. X's opener (heading + four lines) — DEGRADED, and a step WORSE than the Cap. IX run above it on the same column.** The heading survives as `C.\p.  X.` (the `AP` small-capital ligature shattered into backslash-p — a worse garble than p. 237's `Cap. LX.`, and of a different kind) with `De  originc  et  qualitatc  peccatorum  poenalium.`; the body prints `De  peecatis  autem  poenalibus` and `quaedam  tamen  sic  sunt  peecata` (**`cc`→`ec` twice in five lines**), `sint  di-versae`. **This is the exact mirror of p. 236, where the run below the `Cap. VIII.` heading was materially cleaner than the run above it. Grade the run you are actually setting from — the heading is not a grade boundary in either direction.**
- **p. 239, left column, body — DEGRADED-BUT-USABLE, roughly level with p. 238's.** `namque  niotlo`, `adiunctuin  dolorein  et  inoestitiam`, `Minus  spe-cialiter`, `habeiit  adiuiictam`, `meram  depravationein  naturae`, `vel  ignoininiam`, `(juantuin  ad  quae`, `in  reproburn  scnsum`, `Gcncraliter  autein  pec-cata`, `« siint  inter  i»rimam  aposlasiain  et  ulti-mam  poenam  gehennac`, `dici  possimt`, `poena  peccali`, `iuxta  quod  dicit  (iregorius`, `crimiiia  criminilms  viiidicaii`, `Licet  aulein  iileni  dicatur`, `pcccaluni`, `leneniium  taincn  cst`, `oinnis  i)oena`, `pocna  iusta  est`, `libero  volunlatis  arbitrio`, `Pocna  vero`, `a  Deo  csl  inflicta`, `vel  inclinans  ad  culpain  est  contracla`, `ad  inlelligeiitiam  praediclorum  liaec`, `pcr  lioc  quod  nocet  bono`, `iiisi  aiiquid  adimendo`, `consislit  in  modo`, `quod  iioii  sit  corruptivum`, `speciei  ct  or-diuis`, `ordo  nalurae`, `et  oruO  iuslituie` (for *et ordo iustitiae* — the worst word on the page), `bonum  nalu-rale`, `bonum  moralc  in  voluntate`, `)<leo  ordo  naturae  Cii  iii  omni  na-tura` (for *ideo … est in omni natura*), `volunlas  «  est  instrumentum  se  ipsum  inovens`, `nalura  vero  niinime`, `ordo  institiae` (for *iustitiae*), `sed  eliam  facli-vus`, `Qiioniam  crgo`, `malum  privarc  potcst`, `ordiiiem  naturae`, `quqd  duplex  est  maluin`, `poenac`, `« malnin  culpac  est  affcctio  voluntaria`, `malum  autcni  poenae  esl  affeclio  involuntaria`, `Postreino`, `ordo  iuslitiae`, `est  ordo  faclivus`, `« maluiu  culpac.` (**a spurious full stop for the printed comma**).
- **p. 239, right column, body — DEGRADED-BUT-USABLE, about level with the left, and carrying the page's one truly destructive garble.** `quod  est  eius  privatio`, `maluin  iioenae  est  maliim,  qiiwl  patiinur`, `passio  non  csf`, `naturaliler  praccedat  actio`, `ad  qiiain  noii  scqiiatiir  ali(|ua  passio`, **`cst,  (|uod  nulla  (\st  poeiia  sinc  praecedcnte  merito`** — where the raw has **DROPPED the words `: hinc est, quod`** at the anchor point of n. 7 and spliced the fragment `est,` straight on (the marginal gloss `hinC Secomitan-/tur iuvicem.` has bled into the line at exactly that place and eaten the text); `nulla  est  ctiam  cul.pa,  (piiii  coiniletur`, `El  (|uoniain  quod  facimus  a  nobis  est,quoil  pa-tiiiiur`, `a  nobis  et  alialiis` (for *et ab aliis*), `vcl  infcriori`, `non  tamen  omnis  poena  est  a  nobisi` (for *a nobis, immo*), `quacdam  inflicia`, `Et  ((uia  cuin  qui  facit`, `iuslum  cst  pati`, `a  divina  providentia`, `(|uia  ordi-nata`, `per  adeinptionem`, `ye[  boni  niorafc  cuin  naturali`, `quaedam  poena  est  mere  poeim`, `cst  poenu  el  culpa`, `qiiae  est  culpa`, `secundum  ([uod  poena`, `non  instilucnle,  sed  vindicante`, `secundum  id  quod^-.sC` (for *quod est*), `sed  solum  quantum  ad  ordiiieni`, `si  scquatur  ad  originale`, `secuiidum  qiiod  est  privatio`, `aflectio  invo-luntaria`, `sic  non  coinci-dit`, `licet  sit  annexum  ci-dem`, `sivcaliunde`, `sic  coincidunt  m  idem`, `non  ad  iilcni`, `secundum  idein`, `dicitur  praecedentis`, `dicitur  cssc  pocna`, `peccatuni  et  poena  peccati`. **★ The n. 7 splice is the reason the whole body was re-set line-by-line from the bands rather than corrected off the raw** — it is a small-scale instance of the cascade-merge class, and no audit would have fired on it.
- **p. 239 footer — FLATTENED in both blocks and worse in the LEFT, which again is where the numeric-citation notes fall** (nn. 1–4 all carry citations; nn. 5–9 carry three more). Left: `nom.  1 , 28` (for *Rom.*), `Traditlil  illos  Deiis  iu  reprobum  sciisiim`, `(il  fodant  ca  qiiau  iion  conveniiint`, `cordis  eoru a` (see below), `in  inimunditiam  j`, `passioiics  ignominiao`, `llis  verbis  complcctitur`, `d.  X.\XVI.`, `sementiam  August.`, `n.  Sl` (for *n. 51*), `cxhibetur  in  e.\i>onendo`, `pracnolatum  vcrbuni`, `Vide  tom.  II.  pag.  826,  nola  4.`, `II.  Sent.  d.  :S6.` (for *d. 36.*), `Superius  flde  S  posuimiis  libei-o`, `II.  Sent.  d.  33.` (**the raw's `33` is WRONG — the plate prints `35`; see below**). Right: `(praecipue  a.  2.  q.  I.)` (for *q. 1.*), `alii  codd.  et  edd.  ponunt`, `Anselm.,  de  Coiicord.  gral.  et  lib.  arb.  q.  3.  c.  II.` (for *c. 11.*), `tecundum  August.`, `fag.  823` (**the raw's `823` is WRONG — the plate prints `825`; see below**), `c.  I.  n.  1.`, `Mox  voci  factinis`, `A  pracmittit  activus  sice`, `do  Sex  Princip.`, `Omnis  cniin  actio  passionis  est  cflcctiva`, `i)ro  quin  A  C  li  II  quam  non` (for *A C E H*), `cum  aliquof  codd.`, `H  M  0  Q  ct  2  iudicante`, `cxccpla  2,  dicitur  respectu  praecedentis  citlpae`.

**Apparatus (10 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** This chunk owns **p. 238 n. 8** and **p. 239 nn. 1–9**. Every anchor was read on the band; none was inferred from page coverage, from raw anchor glyphs, or from which footer block holds a note.
- p. 238 n. **8** on `quod etiam sunt poena`⁸ *peccati* — **RIGHT** column, three lines below the `Cap. X.` heading. **Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c9`, and the anchor re-verified on the band before adoption.** With it rendered, p. 238's eight-note register is fully consumed by c9 + c10.
- p. 239 n. **1** on `tradi in reprobum sensum`¹ — **left** column.
- p. 239 n. **2** on `et poena peccati`² » — **left** column, inside the Gregorian quotation, *before* the closing guillemet.
- p. 239 n. **3** on `vel acta`³ — **left** column, on the last word of Thesis 3.
- p. 239 n. **4** on `modi, speciei et ordinis`⁴ — **left** column.
- p. 239 n. **5** on `est instrumentum se ipsum movens`⁵ » — **left** column, again *before* the closing guillemet.
- p. 239 n. **6** on `est affectio involuntaria`⁶ » — **left** column, third time before a closing guillemet.
- p. 239 n. **7** on `ad quam non sequatur aliqua passio`⁷ — **RIGHT** column, fifth line.
- p. 239 n. **8** on `secundum id quod est`⁸ — **right** column.
- p. 239 n. **9** on `dicitur praecedentis`⁹ *poena* — **right** column, in the closing paragraph.

**★ FOOTER-BLOCK LAYOUT — p. 239 is a ONE-NOTE OVERRUN whose split falls INSIDE a note.** p. 239's **left** block holds nn. **1–4**, with n. 4 broken off at a word boundary at `…II. Sent. d. 35. per totam, ubi etiam`; the **right** block opens with n. 4's **unnumbered continuation** (`(praecipue a. 2. q. 1.) quae sequuntur fusius declarantur…`) and then carries nn. **5–9**. But **nn. 1–6 all anchor in the LEFT column** — so n. 5 and n. 6 anchor left and print right, a **one-note overrun** on top of the broken note. That is the p. 236 shape and the p. 233 shape at once, and it is a **fifth** distinct page configuration in Pars III. **Read anchors, only anchors.** Only one footnote series runs on p. 239: the ordinals ascend in reading order across both columns, none falls out of column order, and every entry is reachable by an anchor in the body above it. **No printer's signature line falls on p. 239 or p. 240** (the last was `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` on p. 233; the next is due around p. 249).

**Runover findings — ONE POSITIVE, two negative.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 239 — **POSITIVE**, and it is this chunk's to render and to log.* p. 239's left block ends at n. 4's `Cfr. supra c. 1., et II. Sent. d. 35. per totam, ubi etiam`, and the right block's first line opens **UNNUMBERED** with `(praecipue a. 2. q. 1.) quae sequuntur fusius declarantur. —`. n. 4 is rendered joined above. Both ends read at 450 dpi and re-checked under direct zoom. `bon-brev-p3-c9` flagged this as likely-positive from the left side alone; it is confirmed here from both sides. **The break is at a WORD boundary this time, not mid-word as on p. 238** — a runover is not detectable by hyphenation. **Ledger: `p3-c10  p.239 n.4:gutter`.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 239 → p. 240 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 239's last entry, n. 9, closes complete (`Edd., excepta 2, dicitur respectu praecedentis culpae.`), **and p. 240's left footer block opens with a numbered entry `¹`** (`Matth. 12, 32: Qui autem dixerit contra Spiritum sanctum, non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro (ibid. mentio fit peccati contra Filium hominis). — De hoc cap. cfr. II. Sent. d. 43. per totam.`) — no unnumbered fragment stands at its head. p. 240 was extracted and banded to perform this half of the test.
- *Page-crossing, p. 238 → p. 239* was closed NEGATIVE by `bon-brev-p3-c9` and is **not re-logged**; it was nonetheless re-confirmed here from p. 238's side (n. 8 closes complete).

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands** (450 dpi bands throughout; both of p. 239's footer blocks and p. 240's opening re-read under direct high-factor zoom of the 450 dpi page).
- **★ `II. Sent. d. 35. per totam` in n. 4 — the raw's `d. 33.` is WRONG.** The plate's second digit is the old-style `5` (flat top bar over a bowl), plainly distinct from the double-bowl `3` printed two lines earlier in the same block (`nota 3.`, n. 2). Independently right in sense: Lombard's II *Sent.* **d. 35** is *de malo culpae et poenae* and **d. 36** is where *peccatum est poena peccati* is argued — and n. 3 on the same page cites **d. 36** as the exposition of *this* chapter's matter, so n. 4's cross-reference to d. 35 (`ubi etiam … quae sequuntur fusius declarantur`) is the neighbouring distinction, not a repeat. Read **`d. 35.`**
- **★ `tom. II. pag. 825, nota 4.` in n. 6 — the raw's `pag. 823` is WRONG.** Same `3`/`5` discrimination, same page: the final glyph is the old-style `5`, and the `3` of `nota 3. seq.` five words later is a clear double bowl. **Note that n. 3 on this same page cites `tom. II. pag. 826` — two adjacent Vol II pages cited in one footer register, which is exactly the configuration that invites a silent harmonisation. Both were read separately; neither was inferred from the other.**
- **★ THE `II`→`H` FLATTENING — ELEVENTH ATTESTATION, and p. 239 repeats p. 238's proof that both sorts print on one page.** n. 7's `Inferius pro *quin* A C ⟨E⟩ ⟨two bare uprights⟩ *quam non*` (raw `A C li II`) is the crossbar-less sort: read **`A C E H`** — A, C, E and H are all standing Breviloquium sigla and there is no codex `II`. **But n. 8, eight lines below in the same right-hand block, prints `Pro vindicante H M O Q et 2 iudicante` with a perfectly formed, crossbarred `H`.** Two sorts of the one letter in one footer register, for the second consecutive page. **Resolve every instance from the siglum set, every time.**
- **★ THE `1` vs `I` SPLIT AGAIN, both sorts inside p. 239's register.** (i) n. 1's `Pro *ignominiam* I P et 2 *ignorantiam*` is the **fully serifed roman `I`** — symmetric head and foot serifs, standing beside the codex siglum P — read the **codex** siglum `I` (standing: p. 236 n. 6's `I L M V`, p. 238 n. 3's `ut I L`). (ii) n. 2's `ab August., I. contra Adversarium Legis et Prophet.` is the same roman form, here a **book number**. (iii) n. 4's `(praecipue a. 2. q. 1.)` and n. 5's `c. 11.` and n. 6's `c. 1. n. 1.` are all the **flagged serif upright** = the digit `1`; the raw flattens every one of them to `I`. **The distinction is now attested on four consecutive leaves and should be treated as permanent.**
- **Serif-1 corrections in the numeric citations.** n. 1 `Rom. 1, 28` and `v. 24. et 26.` (the `1` is the flagged form; `28` and `26` are clean). n. 2 `Enarrat. in Ps. 57, 9. n. 18.` (raw `n. 48`), `Ibid. c. 1. et 3.` (raw `c. I. et 3.`), `c. 24. n. 51` (raw `n. Sl` — the plate prints a clean old-style `5` followed by a flagged `1`), `(Rom. 1, 26 …)` (raw `Rom. I, 26`). n. 5 `q. 3. c. 11.` (raw `c. II.`) — and **independently right in sense: Anselm, *De concordia praescientiae et praedestinationis nec non gratiae Dei cum libero arbitrio*, q. III c. 11 is where the will is called `instrumentum se ipsum movens`, the very phrase quoted in the body.** n. 6 `c. 9. n. 26` and `ex I. de Lib. Arb. c. 1. n. 1.` (raw `c. I. n. 1.`).
- **Siglum strings.** n. 4's `A S et 2` reads clean. n. 8's `H M O Q` (raw `H M 0 Q`, a zero for the letter O — the same substitution as p. 238 n. 6's `L M 0 V`).
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Preserved as printed, not harmonised.**
- **`Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia,` carries a COLON here**, as in Cap. IX — confirming that p. 237's full stop (Cap. VIII) was a one-off and that the colon is the practice. Checked on the band.
- **The three *Speciali / Minus specialiter / Generaliter* members are punctuated SYMMETRICALLY** with Quaracchi's ` — ` before the second and third, and so are the two *Licet autem* / *Poena vero* theses. **This is the opposite of Cap. IX's asymmetric *appetit*/*refugit* division; the em-dash articulation is not uniform across capitula and must be transcribed, not regularised.**
- **`« malum culpae, quod est eius privatio, est malum, quod facimus, et malum poenae est malum, quod patimur ».`** The opening guillemet stands at the foot of p. 239's left column and the closing one in the right column, so the quotation is the unit that crosses the gutter; **the plate carries NO footnote on it**, although the parallel Augustinian quotations at nn. 5 and 6 both carry one. Not an omission to be repaired — no anchor is printed.
- **Three of this page's six anchors sit BEFORE the closing guillemet** (nn. 2, 5, 6: `…poena peccati² »`, `…movens⁵ »`, `…involuntaria⁶ »`), not after it. The markers are placed at those exact positions in both languages.
- **`in desideria cordis eorum` in n. 1 — a BATTERED SORT, not a plate error.** The plate's final `m` at the line end has broken into a detached blob and the 450 dpi image reads `eoru a,`; the raw agrees (`cordis eoru a`). This is physical damage to a single sort, not a compositor's reading (contrast `delectactione` on p. 238, which is a genuine error and stands as printed). The word is rendered **`eorum`**, which is also the Vulgate reading at Rom. 1:24. **Recorded rather than silently mended; a polish pass should not treat it as a variant.**
- **`et poena peccati` inside the Gregorian quotation is set in ROMAN while the surrounding `peccata` and `poena` in the same sentence are ITALIC** — Quaracchi italicise the two terms as technical vocabulary but drop the italic inside the quoted matter. Preserved as printed.

**Enumerations preserved exactly.** The **threefold** division of how sins are called penalties of sin (*specialiter / minus specialiter / generaliter*); the **three theses** of the summary (identity of *peccatum* and *poena peccati*; every penalty just and from God, no fault from God; the *inflicta / contracta / acta* split), which the *Ratio* answers as *Pro thesi 1 / 2 / 3* in the margin; the **twofold** order (*naturae / iustitiae*) and consequent twofold evil (*culpae / poenae*); and the closing **threefold** penalty (*acta, inflicta, contracta*). None was renumbered or reordered, and the English keeps the Latin's order in every list.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 238 R — "Thesis 1." p. 239 L — "Hoc dicitur tripliciter." · "Thesis 2." · "Thesis 3." · "Ratio." · "Pro thesi 1." · "Duplex ordo et malum." · "Culpa est voluntaria, poena involuntaria." p. 239 R — "Se comitantur invicem." · "Triplex poena." · "Pro thesi 2." · "Pro thesi 3." · "Distinctio." · "Corollarium."

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c9`:* **p. 238 footer note 8 — ONE entry**, `Edd., excepta 2, cum paucis codd. *poenae*.` c9's anchor location (`quod etiam sunt poena`⁸ *peccati*, p. 238 right column, three lines below the `Cap. X.` heading) was treated as a hint and **re-verified on the band before adoption**; it is correct. c9's four other recorded orientations were likewise re-checked: the p. 238/239 **word-boundary** break at `Speciali` / `namque` is confirmed; **p. 239's gutter of 1200 is confirmed visually**; **p. 239's left block does open numbered `¹`**; and the **likely-positive p. 239 gutter runover at n. 4's `ubi etiam` is confirmed POSITIVE** from both sides. Of c9's provisional readings of p. 239's nn. 1–4, relayed from the raw and explicitly flagged as unsettled, **one was corrected**: n. 4's `II. Sent. d. 35.` (raw `d. 33.`), settled from the plate and from Lombard's own distinction sequence.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c11` (Cap. XI, *De origine peccatorum finalium, quae sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum*):* **NOTHING. c10 forwards no note.** pp. 238 and 239 are both fully consumed (p. 238 by c9 + c10, p. 239 entirely by c10). This is the fourth Breviloquium chunk to forward nothing (cf. `p2-c10`, `p3-c6`, `p3-c8`). **Do not read "nothing forwarded" as "nothing to check" — read p. 240's footer off the bands from n. 1.**
- *Recorded for `bon-brev-p3-c11`, from bands read here but not owned here:* **Cap. XI opens at the HEAD of p. 240's LEFT column**, directly beneath the running head `240 · BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. XI.`, under `Cap. XI. / De origine peccatorum finalium, quae sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum.`, and its first paragraph (`De peccatis autem finalibus sive irremissibilibus, cuiusmodi sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum, haec tenenda sunt…`) runs on beneath it. **p. 240's bands already exist** (`raw/vision/vol5/p-240.png`, gutter **1338**, measured here over rows 20–60 % after the default window FAILED at 13 px — see the gutter note above; do not re-derive it from the default window and conclude 1362). **p. 240's footer register was NOT read in full here and is NOT in `KNOWN_TOTALS` — c11 must read it and feed it.** What was seen of the LEFT block while closing the page-crossing test, orientation only: it opens numbered `¹` and holds at least nn. 1–3 — n. 1 `Matth. 12, 32: Qui autem dixerit contra Spiritum sanctum, non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro (ibid. mentio fit peccati contra Filium hominis). — De hoc cap. cfr. II. Sent. d. 43. per totam.`; n. 2 `Edd., excepta 2, Filii, ratione rationis; Spiritus sancti, ratione voluntatis. Pro insigne plures codd. imaginem.`; n. 3 `Cfr. supra p. I. c. 6. — De triplici peccato, scil. ex in-` **(broken off in the reading, NOT necessarily at the block foot — c11 must find the block's true last entry itself).** **Every digit there is a serif `1`/`4`, `3`/`5` candidate — none is settled by this note.**


site: bonaventure

collection: Breviloquium

title: Pars 3, Cap. 11

author: St. Bonaventure

languages: en la

title: Opera Omnia (Quaracchi critical edition)

publisher: Collegii S. Bonaventurae

source_text:
<!-- page 240 -->

### Capitulum XI. *De origine peccatorum finalium, quae sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum.*

De peccatis autem *finalibus* sive irremissibilibus, cuiusmodi sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum, haec tenenda sunt, quod licet omne peccatum *generaliter* sit contra Deum trinum et unum, *appropriate* tamen dicitur aliquod peccatum esse *in Patrem*, aliquod *in Filium*, aliquod *in Spiritum sanctum*. — Hoc autem peccatum in Spiritum sanctum *irremissibile* dicitur in hoc saeculo et in futuro[^p240-1], non quia in hoc saeculo non possit dimitti, sed quia raro dimittitur aut vix in hoc saeculo quantum ad *culpam*, modicum autem et quasi nihil fiet sibi remissio in futuro quantum ad *poenam*. — Huius autem peccati sex sunt differentiae, scilicet *invidia fraternae gratiae, impugnatio veritatis agnitae, desperatio, praesumtio, obstinatio mentis* et *impoenitentia finalis*.

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum peccatum dicat recessum a primo principio trino et uno, omne peccatum imaginem Trinitatis deformat et ipsam animam foedat quantum ad triplicem potentiam, scilicet irascibilem, rationalem et concupiscibilem; et a libero arbitrio procedit, quod gerit in se insigne Trinitatis: Patris, ratione *facultatis*; Filii, quia *rationis*; Spiritus sancti, quia *voluntatis*[^p240-2].

Licet autem haec tria concurrant simul ad omnem culpam, quaelibet tamen harum per suum defectum potest esse ratio deordinandi alias. Defectus autem circa *facultatem* est impotentia, circa *rationem* est ignorantia, circa *voluntatem* est malitia. Et hinc est, quod cum quaedam sint peccata ex *impotentia*, quaedam ex *ignorantia*, quaedam ex *malitia*; et potentia attribuatur Patri, sapientia Filio et voluntas Spiritui sancto[^p240-3]; quod quaedam dicuntur esse *in Patrem*, quaedam *in Filium*, quaedam *in Spiritum sanctum*. Et quoniam nihil magis est in voluntate quam ipsa voluntas[^p240-4]; et voluntas ipsa est origo peccati: nullum peccatum est adeo voluntarium et mere, sicut illud quod provenit ex corruptione existente in *voluntate*. — Cum enim dupliciter dicatur involuntarium, scilicet per *violentiam* et per *ignorantiam*: primum per defectum potentiae, secundum per defectum scientiae[^p240-5]; quando voluntas sola corruptione sua, licet possit resistere et sciat, hoc malum esse, aliquid eligit; tunc dicitur peccare *ex certa malitia*; et tale peccatum mere procedit ex improbitate voluntatis liberi arbitrii et directe impugnat gratiam Spiritus sancti. — Et quia mere procedit ex libertate arbitrii, ideo non habet colorem excusationis, et propterea modicum et quasi nihil debet ei qui punitur, de *poena*[^p240-6] relaxari. Quia vero directe impugnat gratiam Spiritus sancti, per quam fit remissio peccati; ideo dicitur *irremissibile*, non quia nullo modo possit remitti, sed quia, quantum est de se, directe est impugnativum medicamenti et remedii, per quod fieri habet remissio peccati.

Et quoniam remissio peccati fit a Deo per gratiam poenitentialem intra ecclesiasticam unitatem; ideo differentiae huius peccati accipiuntur, secundum quod directe impugnant illa tria. Aut enim impugnant ipsam gratiam poenitentialem *in se*; aut *in comparatione ad Deum*, a quo datur; aut *in comparatione ad Ecclesiam*, in qua suscipitur. Si *in comparatione ad unitatem Ecclesiae*; sic, quia unitas Ecclesiae consistit in fide et caritate, sive in *gratia et veritate*[^p240-7]: sic est duplex peccatum, scilicet *invidia fraternae gratiae* et *impugnatio veritatis agnitae*. — Si in *comparatione ad Deum* dantem; cum *universae viae eius* quantum ad iustificationem maxime sint *misericordia et veritas*[^p240-8], sic est duplex peccatum: unum scilicet, quod impugnat misericordiam, et hoc est *desperatio*; aliud, quod impugnat iustitiam, et hoc est *impunitatis praesumtio*. — Si vero impugnat ipsam gratiam poenitentialem *in se* vel *secundum se*, sic est duplex: quia gratia poenitentialis facit *resilire* a commissis[^p240-9] et *praecavere* a committendis. Contra primum est *obstinatio mentis*, contra secundum est *impoenitentia finalis*, secundum quod *finalis impoenitentia* dicitur propositum non poenitendi; sic enim est species peccati in Spiritum sanctum. Secundum autem quod *finalis impoenitentia* dicit continuationem peccati usque in finem; sic est sequela omnium mortalium, quae in hac vita non remittuntur, et maxime omnium specierum peccati in Spiritum sanctum.

<!-- page 241 -->

Et sic omne peccatum *initium* sumit a superbia[^p241-1] et *consummationem* sive finem habet in finali impoenitentia; in quam qui pervenerit corruit in gehennam, a qua nullus peccans mortaliter potest liberari, nisi interveniat gratia mediatoris Christi. Et ideo incarnationem ipsius desiderabat universitas salvandorum, cui mediatori Domino nostro omnis *honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum. Amen*[^p241-2].

---

english:
### Chapter XI. *On the origin of the final sins, which are the sins against the Holy Spirit.*

Now concerning the *final* or irremissible sins, of which sort are the sins against the Holy Spirit, these things are to be held: that although every sin is *generally* against God three and one, nevertheless *by appropriation* some sin is said to be *against the Father*, some *against the Son*, some *against the Holy Spirit*. — But this sin against the Holy Spirit is called *irremissible* in this world and in the world to come[^p240-1] — not because it cannot be remitted in this world, but because it is rarely remitted, or scarcely, in this world as regards *fault*, while little and almost no remission will be made for it in the world to come as regards *penalty*. — Now of this sin there are six differentiae, namely *envy of a brother's grace, impugning of the acknowledged truth, despair, presumption, obstinacy of mind* and *final impenitence*.

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since sin bespeaks a withdrawal from the first principle, three and one, every sin deforms the image of the Trinity and defiles the soul itself as regards its threefold power, namely the irascible, the rational and the concupiscible; and it proceeds from free choice, which bears in itself the mark of the Trinity — of the Father, by reason of *faculty*; of the Son, because of *reason*; of the Holy Spirit, because of *will*[^p240-2].

But although these three concur together in every fault, nevertheless each of them through its own defect can be the ground of disordering the others. Now the defect concerning *faculty* is impotence, that concerning *reason* is ignorance, that concerning *will* is malice. And hence it is that, since some sins are from *impotence*, some from *ignorance*, some from *malice*; and since power is attributed to the Father, wisdom to the Son and will to the Holy Spirit[^p240-3]; therefore some are said to be *against the Father*, some *against the Son*, some *against the Holy Spirit*. And since nothing is more in the will than the will itself[^p240-4]; and the will itself is the origin of sin: no sin is so voluntary and so purely voluntary as that which comes forth from a corruption existing in the *will*. — For since the involuntary is said in two ways, namely by *violence* and by *ignorance* — the first through a defect of power, the second through a defect of knowledge[^p240-5] — when the will, by its own corruption alone, although it is able to resist and knows this to be evil, chooses something; then it is said to sin *from settled malice*; and such a sin proceeds purely from the wickedness of the will of free choice, and directly impugns the grace of the Holy Spirit. — And because it proceeds purely from the liberty of choice, therefore it has no color of excuse, and on that account little and almost nothing ought to be relaxed of the *penalty*[^p240-6] for him who is punished. But because it directly impugns the grace of the Holy Spirit, through which the remission of sin comes about; therefore it is called *irremissible*, not because it can in no way be remitted, but because, so far as lies in itself, it is directly destructive of the medicine and the remedy through which the remission of sin has to come about.

And since the remission of sin is brought about by God through penitential grace within ecclesiastical unity; therefore the differentiae of this sin are taken according as they directly impugn those three. For either they impugn penitential grace itself *in itself*; or *in comparison to God*, by whom it is given; or *in comparison to the Church*, in which it is received. If *in comparison to the unity of the Church*: then, because the unity of the Church consists in faith and charity, or in *grace and truth*[^p240-7], the sin is twofold, namely *envy of a brother's grace* and *impugning of the acknowledged truth*. — If in *comparison to God* who gives: then, since *all his ways*, as regards justification, are chiefly *mercy and truth*[^p240-8], the sin is twofold — one, namely, which impugns mercy, and this is *despair*; the other, which impugns justice, and this is *presumption of impunity*. — But if it impugns penitential grace itself *in itself* or *according to itself*, it is twofold: because penitential grace makes one *recoil* from things committed[^p240-9] and *beware* of things to be committed. Against the first is *obstinacy of mind*, against the second is *final impenitence* — according as *final impenitence* is called the resolve of not repenting; for so it is a species of the sin against the Holy Spirit. But according as *final impenitence* means the continuation of sin unto the end; so it is the sequel of all mortal sins which are not remitted in this life, and most of all of all the species of the sin against the Holy Spirit.

<!-- page 241 -->

And thus every sin takes its *beginning* from pride[^p241-1] and has its *consummation*, or end, in final impenitence; and whoever comes to that falls headlong into hell, from which no one sinning mortally can be freed unless the grace of the mediator Christ intervene. And therefore the whole company of those to be saved longed for his incarnation — to whom, our Lord and mediator, be all *honor and glory unto the ages of ages. Amen*[^p241-2].

---

la: Matth. 12, 32: *Qui autem dixerit contra Spiritum sanctum, non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro* (ibid. mentio fit peccati contra *Filium* hominis). — De hoc cap. cfr. II. Sent. d. 43. per totam.

en: Matt. 12:32: *But he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come* (in the same place mention is made of the sin against the *Son* of man). — On this chapter cf. II *Sent.*, d. 43, throughout.

la: Edd., excepta 2, *Filii, ratione rationis; Spiritus sancti, ratione voluntatis*. Pro *insigne* plures codd. *imaginem*.

en: The editions, except edition 2, read *Filii, ratione rationis; Spiritus sancti, ratione voluntatis*. For *insigne* several codices have *imaginem*.

la: Cfr. supra p. I. c. 6. — De triplici peccato, scil. ex infirmitate, ignorantia et malitia, eiusque diversa gravitate vide Gregor., XXV. Moral. c. 11. n. 28, et Isidor., II. Sent. sive de Sum. Bono, c. 17. n. 3. seqq., ex quo Magister Sent. quaedam retulit II. Sent. d. XXII. c. 4. in fine.

en: Cf. above, part I, c. 6. — On the threefold sin, namely from infirmity, ignorance and malice, and on its differing gravity, see Gregory, *Moralia* XXV, c. 11, n. 28, and Isidore, *Sentences* II, or *On the Highest Good*, c. 17, n. 3 ff., from which the Master of the Sentences reported certain things in II *Sent.*, d. XXII, c. 4, at the end.

la: August., I. de Lib. Arb. c. 12. n. 26: *Quid enim tam in voluntate quam ipsa voluntas sita est?* Ibid. III. c. 3. n. 7: *Nihil tam in nostra potestate quam ipsa voluntas est.* Cfr. II. Sent. lit. Magistri, d. XLI. c. 4. — Pro *et mere* E H S *et merum* (scil. peccatum).

en: Augustine, *On Free Choice of the Will* I, c. 12, n. 26: *For what is so much placed in the will as the will itself?* In the same work III, c. 3, n. 7: *Nothing is so much in our power as the will itself.* Cf. II *Sent.*, the text of the Master, d. XLI, c. 4. — For *et mere*, E H S have *et merum* (namely, sin).

la: Vide Aristot., III. Ethic. c. 1, et Damasc., II. de Fide orthod. c. 24. Cfr. II. Sent. d. 22. a. 2. q. 3. — Inferius post *Spiritus sancti* Vat., 1 et 3 addunt *per quam fit remissio peccati*.

en: See Aristotle, *Ethics* III, c. 1, and Damascene, *On the Orthodox Faith* II, c. 24. Cf. II *Sent.*, d. 22, a. 2, q. 3. — Below, after *Spiritus sancti*, the Vatican edition and editions 1 and 3 add *per quam fit remissio peccati*.

la: Plures codd., inter quos etiam E L M S, *de culpa*.

en: Several codices, among which also E L M S, have *de culpa*.

la: Ioan. 1, 17: *Lex per Moysen data est, gratia et veritas per Iesum Christum facta est.*

en: John 1:17: *The law was given by Moses; grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.*

la: Psalm. 24, 10: *Universae viae Domini* [ita etiam B] *misericordia* etc. Cfr. IV. Sent. d. 46. a. 2. q. 3.

en: Ps. 24:10: *All the ways of the Lord* [so also B] *are mercy* etc. Cf. IV *Sent.*, d. 46, a. 2, q. 3.

la: Edd. cum aliquot codd. praefigunt *peccatis*.

en: The editions, together with some codices, prefix *peccatis*.

la: Vide supra c. 9. — Inferius post *a qua* edd. addunt *quidem impoenitentia finali*, L M V autem prosequuntur: *nullus moriens in peccato mortali potest liberari, nisi, dum vivit, poeniteat, adiuvante et interveniente gratia mediatoris* etc.

en: See above, c. 9. — Below, after *a qua*, the editions add *quidem impoenitentia finali*, while L M V continue: *nullus moriens in peccato mortali potest liberari, nisi, dum vivit, poeniteat, adiuvante et interveniente gratia mediatoris*, etc.

la: Epist. I. Tim. 1, 17. Ibid. 2, 5: *Unus et mediator Dei et hominum, homo Christus Iesus.*

en: Epistle 1 Timothy 1:17. Ibid. 2:5: *And one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus.* ---

translators_notes:
**★★ PAGE SPAN — Cap. XI RUNS ONTO p. 241, AND THE WHITE SPACE AT THE FOOT OF p. 240's RIGHT COLUMN WOULD HAVE HIDDEN IT.** Cap. XI opens at the **head of p. 240's LEFT column**, directly beneath the running head `240 · BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. XI.`, under `Cap. XI. / De origine peccatorum finalium, quae sunt peccata in Spiritum sanctum.` — the first Pars III capitulum to open a page since Cap. I opened p. 231. It fills that column, crosses p. 240's gutter **MID-WORD** (`— Cum enim dupliciter di-` / `catur involuntarium, scilicet per violentiam…`), fills the right column, and its penultimate paragraph ends at `…et maxime omnium specierum peccati in Spiritum sanctum.` **A clear band of white paper then stands between that line and p. 240's footnote rule** — exactly the artefact `bon-brev-p2-c4` was written short on, and exactly the inference this chunk was forbidden to draw. It is not the end of the capitulum: **the closing paragraph `Et sic omne peccatum initium sumit a superbia…` stands at the head of p. 241, set across BOTH of that page's columns** (four lines left, four lines right), and the chapter — and with it Pars III — closes at `…omnis honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum. Amen².` The end is fixed **POSITIVELY** from the full-width display heading `PARS QUARTA. / De incarnatione Verbi.` which stands immediately below that paragraph, followed by `Cap. I. / De ratione, qua Verbum Dei debuit incarnari vel decuit.` **Nothing here was inferred from white space.**

**★★ THE RUNNING HEAD NAMED THE WRONG *PARS*, NOT MERELY THE WRONG CAPITULUM — the strongest attestation yet of its asymmetry.** p. 241's running head reads `PARS IV. C. I.` although the top eight lines of that page are still **Pars III, Cap. XI**, and note 1 of its footer register belongs to Pars III. After p. 237 and p. 238, where the head named the capitulum that barely reached the page, this is the same defect one order of magnitude up: **the head can confirm that a unit reaches a page; it can never show that one does not, and here it does not even get the part right.** Read it in one direction only.

**★ A PART OPENING DOES NOT ALWAYS OPEN A PAGE.** `PARS QUARTA` begins part-way down p. 241, under the tail of the preceding pars, not at the head of a fresh leaf. The frozen convention folds the part opening into `bon-brev-p4-c1`; that chunk therefore begins mid-page and inherits a page whose first paragraph and first two footnotes are not its own.

**Gutter.** **p. 240 = 1338**, re-measured here rather than adopted: `colcrop.py vol5 240` with no constant returns **1362 on a 13 px run with the tool's own ⚠ WEAK RUN flag — a FAILED measurement**, reproduced exactly. Re-profiling over narrower row windows gives rows 30–70 % → **1338 / 60 px**, rows 20–60 % → **1338 / 63 px**, rows 25–65 % → **1339 / 61 px**, rows 15–45 % → **1337 / 64 px**. **1338** is confirmed visually on the bands read here, and independently reproduces `bon-brev-p3-c10`'s value. **p. 241 was extracted and auto-measured fresh**: the default window returns **1218 on a 39 px run** — above the 15 px failure threshold, so not flagged, but rows 20–60 %, 25–65 % and 30–70 % all return **1228 on a 60 px run**, and rows 15–45 % return 1175 on a 144 px run (that window straddles the blank paper around the `PARS QUARTA` display heading and is worthless). **p. 241 = 1228**; the bands here were cut at 1218 and the 10 px difference is absorbed by `colcrop`'s overlap, but **1228 is the value the next chunk should use.** **★ NOTE FOR `bon-brev-p4-c1`: the full-width `PARS QUARTA` heading crossing p. 241's gutter did NOT destroy the measurement, because the default window (rows 45–92 %) sits below it.** The failure mode CLAUDE.md warns about at a part opening (pp. 201, 219) requires the heading to fall *inside* the measured rows; here it falls above them. The running series is now 1194 · 1337 · 1211 · 1341 · 1210 · 1331 · 1209 · 1338 · 1200 · 1338 · **1228**. **Parity remains spent; measure every page.**

**★ A WEAK-BUT-PASSING RUN IS STILL WORTH RE-MEASURING.** p. 240's failure was loud (13 px, flagged). p. 241's default measurement was *quiet* — 39 px, no flag — and still 10 px off the value three independent higher windows agree on. **The tool's flag is a floor, not a warrant: when a Vol V run comes in well under the ~60 px the volume usually gives, re-profile before trusting it.**

**Raw-quality verdict, per page AND per region.**
- **p. 240, left column, heading + body — GOOD, the cleanest run in Pars III since p. 236.** The chapter heading survives intact as `Cap. XI. / De origine peccatorum finaUum, qiiae sunl peccata in Spirilum sanclum.` — **the first Pars III chapter heading the raw has not shattered** (contrast p. 237's `Cap. LX.` and p. 238's `C.\p. X.`). Scattered garbles only: `Tuesis 1.`/`Tiesis 3.` (the marginal glosses), `De i^eccalis`, `Banctum`, `Irinum`, `ijeccatum`, `Pu-trem`, `Spirilum san-clum`, `lloc`, `irremissihile`, `lioc saeculo`, `culpuni`, `au-tein`, `vcritatis`, `praesumtio`, `impoenilenlia`, `liaec`, `priucipio`, `concupiscibileni`, `»-ai«onjy` (for *rationis* — the worst word on the page), `vohmtatis`, `dcfectus potcst essc`, `facuUatem`, `ratio-nem-`, `ignoranlia`, `voluntalem`, `quaedacn`, `quacdam ex mali-`, `potenlia`, `qiiaedam`, `Filiuni`, `in.` (for *in*), `Spirilum .sanctum`, `nuUum`, `volunlate`.
- **p. 240, right column, body — GOOD, level with the left.** `mvoluntarium, scdicet per violentmn`, `Bnpie»  mvo-lontarium` (gloss), `tgnoranliam.`, `primnm per detectnm`, `delectum`, `corrnptione`, `hoe malum`, `ellgit`, `'Joiiisiipcc-catura iii Spi-riium s.` (gloss), `ex eerla malitia`, `etdirecte`, `gratiain`, `halwt`, `Aepoena`, `irremissibilc`, `qnia`, `quantnm`, `rle se`, `dilTerentiae`, `accipiunlur`, `qiiod`, `impugoant` (gloss), `sciUcet`, `agnilae`, `uniuersae`, `maxinie`, `verilas`, `peccatnm: uimm`, `ahud`, `iustitiam,et`, `praesumlio`, `ce tenio` (gloss), `focit`, `lis` (for *mentis*), `imnoenitenlia`, `DupiMim-poeuitentra` (gloss), `fi.nalis`, `antem`.
- **p. 240 footer — FLATTENED, and the numeric-citation notes are again the worst of it.** `Malili. 12, 32`, `dixcrit coiilra`, `remilteUir`, `sauculo ncque`, `ScnL d. 43.`, `e.xcepta i` (for *excepta 2* — a digit turned into a letter), `rationis-;`, `ratioM voluniatis`, `imagimm`, `stipra p. 1. c. 6.` (for *p. I. c. 6.*), `ciusque`, `XXV. Moral. c. II. n. 28` (for *c. 11.*), `de Sum. Bon9, c. 1-7. n. 3.` (for *c. 17.*), `d. XXII. c. 4. in llne`, `Quld enim lam`, `Ibid. 111. c. 3. n. 7`, `Cfi'. II. Sent. lit. Maglsui, d. XLl. c. 4.`, `Pi-o el mere E U S et merum` (for *E H S*), `Aristot., 111. Etliic. c. 1`, `Damasc, U. de Fide orlhod. c. 24`, `Vol., I el 3 addunt` (for *Vat., 1 et 3*), `mnissio pecmti`, `ELMS`, `loan. I , 17` (for *Ioan. 1, 17*), `Lex |)er Moysen datn es(`, `[ila etiam IJ]` (for *[ita etiam B]*), `mi-scricordia eic.`, `IV. Sent. d. 46. a. 2. q. 3,`, `Edd. e\im aliquot codd. praeflgunt peccalis`.
- **p. 241, both columns of Cap. XI's closing paragraph — DEGRADED, a clear step down from p. 240 and inside a single paragraph.** `omnc peccatiini iidliuin siimil a siipcr-bia` (for *initium sumit*), `conmmmalionem sivc fiiicm iiahct in linali inipociiitentia`, `in qnam qni iiervenerit`, `geiieiinam, a qna nnllus [K'ccans niortaliter`, `ineiliatoris Cliristi. Kt`, `ipsiiis (lcsiilerahat iiniversitas .sal-vandoram`, `cni rnediatori`, `hoiiov cl (/loria in saeciila ■saecxlorum`. **Eight printed lines, and the raw mangles a word in nearly every one.** The whole paragraph was re-set from the bands.
- **p. 241 footer, nn. 1–2 — FLATTENED.** `Infcrius po.st a qwi edtl. ntldiint iiuiilrm intpoenitmtin finali`, `prosei|tniiittir`, `nvlliis moriens in peccito mortali`, `nki, dura lioil, poenitcfit`, `inlerceniente gratia mediuloris cto`, `lipist. I. Tim. 1 , 17. Ibid. 2, o:` (for *2, 5*), `mcdialor`, `liominiim, liomo Christtis lesus`.

**Apparatus (11 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** This chunk owns **p. 240 nn. 1–9** (the page's entire register) and **p. 241 nn. 1–2**. Every anchor was read on the band; none was inferred from page coverage, from raw anchor glyphs, or from which footer block holds a note.
- p. 240 n. **1** on `in hoc saeculo et in futuro`¹ — **left** column, Thesis 2.
- p. 240 n. **2** on `quia voluntatis`² — **left** column, closing the *Ratio*'s first member.
- p. 240 n. **3** on `voluntas Spiritui sancto`³ — **left** column.
- p. 240 n. **4** on `quam ipsa voluntas`⁴ — **left** column.
- p. 240 n. **5** on `per defectum scientiae`⁵ — **RIGHT** column, third line.
- p. 240 n. **6** on `de poena`⁶ — **right** column.
- p. 240 n. **7** on `sive in gratia et veritate`⁷ — **right** column.
- p. 240 n. **8** on `misericordia et veritas`⁸ — **right** column.
- p. 240 n. **9** on `facit resilire a commissis`⁹ — **right** column.
- p. 241 n. **1** on `sumit a superbia`¹ — **left** column of the closing paragraph.
- p. 241 n. **2** on `in saecula saeculorum. Amen`² — **right** column of the closing paragraph, the last word of Pars III.

**★ FOOTER-BLOCK LAYOUT — p. 240 IS THE FIRST *CLEAN* PAGE IN PARS III: the block split and the column split coincide EXACTLY, and the split still falls inside a note.** p. 240's **left** block holds nn. **1–4**, with n. 4 broken off at a word boundary at `…Ibid. III. c. 3. n. 7:`; the **right** block opens with n. 4's **unnumbered continuation** (`Nihil tam in nostra potestate quam ipsa voluntas est. …`) and then carries nn. **5–9**. Anchors: nn. 1–4 left, nn. 5–9 right — **the block division and the anchor division agree**. That is the p. 238 shape (coincidence + split-inside-a-note) and **not** the p. 239 shape (overrun + split-inside-a-note) one leaf later. **It is a coincidence again and worth nothing for the next page. Read anchors, only anchors.**
**p. 241's register is split by CAPITULUM, not by block**: its left block holds nn. **1–5** and closes complete, its right block holds nn. **6–10** and closes complete — but **nn. 1–2 anchor in Pars III's last paragraph and nn. 3–10 anchor in Pars IV, Cap. I.** The block boundary and the *pars* boundary are unrelated. Only one footnote series runs on each page; the ordinals ascend in reading order across both columns and every entry is reachable by an anchor above it.
**The printer's signature `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` stands at the foot of p. 241's LEFT footer block, below n. 5. It is not an entry and is not counted** (the last was on p. 233; p. 240 carries none).

**Runover findings — ONE POSITIVE, three negative.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 240 — **POSITIVE**, and it is this chunk's to render and to log.* p. 240's left block ends at n. 4's `August., I. de Lib. Arb. c. 12. n. 26: Quid enim tam in voluntate quam ipsa voluntas sita est? Ibid. III. c. 3. n. 7:` — **broken after a colon**, mid-citation — and the right block's first line opens **UNNUMBERED** with `Nihil tam in nostra potestate quam ipsa voluntas est.` n. 4 is rendered joined above. Both ends read at 450 dpi and re-checked under direct zoom. **★ A THIRD DISTINCT BREAK POSITION IN THREE CONSECUTIVE LEAVES: p. 238 broke MID-WORD (`fu-`/`giens`), p. 239 broke at a WORD boundary (`ubi etiam`), p. 240 breaks at a PUNCTUATION boundary, after the colon that introduces a quotation.** The break position carries no information at all; only the next block's first line does. **Ledger: `p3-c11  p.240 n.4:gutter`.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 240 → p. 241 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 240's last entry, n. 9, closes complete (`Edd. cum aliquot codd. praefigunt peccatis.`), and p. 241's left footer block opens with a numbered entry `¹`. No unnumbered fragment stands at its head.
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 241 — **NEGATIVE**, closed from both sides.* p. 241's left block closes complete at n. 5 (`…quae etiam inferius post repararet addunt reparanda.`), followed only by the printer's signature; its right block opens with a numbered entry `⁶`. **This test was performed here because p. 241's bands were read here, but it is NOT logged on this chunk's ledger line: nn. 5 and 6 both anchor in Pars IV, so the p. 241 gutter belongs to `bon-brev-p4-c1`'s accounting.** It is recorded here so that chunk does not have to re-derive it — **but the p. 241 → p. 242 page-crossing test is still open and is `bon-brev-p4-c1`'s to run.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 239 → p. 240* was closed NEGATIVE by `bon-brev-p3-c10` and is **not re-logged**; it was re-confirmed here from p. 240's side (its left block opens numbered `¹`).

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands** (450 dpi bands throughout; both footer registers on p. 240 and p. 241's left block re-read under direct high-factor zoom).
- **`De hoc cap. cfr. II. Sent. d. 43. per totam` (p. 240 n. 1)** — the raw agrees, and the reading is independently right in sense: Lombard's II *Sent.* **d. 43** is precisely *de peccato in Spiritum sanctum, quod irremissibile dicitur*. The plate's `4` and `3` are distinct sorts here (flag-and-bar vs. double bowl).
- **★ `Cfr. supra p. I. c. 6.` (p. 240 n. 3) — the raw's `p. 1.` is the FLATTENING, not the reading.** The plate prints the fully serifed roman `I` (symmetric head and foot serifs), i.e. **Pars I**, against the flagged serif upright it uses for the edition-siglum digit `1` elsewhere in the very same register (n. 5's `Vat., 1 et 3`). Independently right in sense: Breviloquium **p. I. c. 6** is *De appropriatione* — where *potentia / sapientia / voluntas* are appropriated to the three Persons, which is the doctrine this sentence leans on. **This is the twelfth leaf on which the `1` vs `I` split appears, and the first on which both sorts stand inside one footnote's neighbourhood in an unmistakably contrastive pair.**
- **★ `Gregor., XXV. Moral. c. 11. n. 28` (p. 240 n. 3) — the raw's `c. II.` is the same flattening in the other direction.** The plate prints two flagged serif uprights, i.e. the digits `11`, not the roman numeral `II`; the roman `XXV` two words earlier prints with full serifs and is plainly a different sort. Read **`c. 11.`**
- **`Isidor., II. Sent. sive de Sum. Bono, c. 17. n. 3. seqq.` (p. 240 n. 3)** — the raw's `c. 1-7.` is Quaracchi's serif `1` broken by the hyphenation slot; the plate reads `17` as one number. Read **`c. 17.`** The roman `II.` before `Sent.` is the fully serifed sort — a book number, correctly.
- **★ THE `II`→`H` FLATTENING — TWELFTH ATTESTATION.** p. 240 n. 4's `Pro *et mere* ⟨E⟩ ⟨two bare uprights⟩ ⟨S⟩ *et merum*` (raw `E U S`, the band showing two crossbar-less uprights) is the same sort as p. 237 n. 7's `D H T`, p. 238 n. 7's `cum H T` and p. 239 n. 7's `A C E H` — read **`E H S`**. There is no codex `II` and no codex `U` in the Breviloquium siglum set; E, H and S are all standing. **Unlike pp. 238 and 239, p. 240 prints NO crossbarred `H` anywhere in its register, so the page offers no internal contrast — the call rests on the siglum set alone, which is exactly what the standing rule requires.**
- **`Vat., 1 et 3` (p. 240 n. 5)** — the flagged serif uprights are the EDITION sigla `1` and `3`, standing beside `Vat.`; the raw flattens the first to `I` (`Vol., I el 3`). Read **`1 et 3`**.
- **`Psalm. 24, 10: Universae viae Domini [ita etiam B] misericordia etc.` (p. 240 n. 8)** — the raw's `[ila etiam IJ]` is a broken `B`; the band shows a clean, closed double-bowl `B`. Read **`B`**. (Cf. the `H M 0 Q` zero-for-O on p. 239 — the same class of raw-side letter damage.)
- **`Cfr. IV. Sent. d. 46. a. 2. q. 3.` (p. 240 n. 8)** — `46` read clean; the `4` is the serif form Quaracchi also use for a genuine four, and the `6` is unmistakable.
- **`Epist. I. Tim. 1, 17. Ibid. 2, 5` (p. 241 n. 2)** — the `I.` before `Tim.` is the fully serifed roman (the epistle number), the `1` of `1, 17` is the flagged upright (the chapter), **both inside four printed characters of each other**. Independently right in sense: 1 Tim. 1:17 is *Regi autem saeculorum immortali… honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum. Amen* — the doxology Bonaventure has just quoted — and 1 Tim. 2:5 is the *unus et mediator* the note goes on to give. The raw's `2, o` for `2, 5` is a broken old-style `5`.
- **`Vide supra c. 9.` (p. 241 n. 1)** — read clean, and independently right: Pars III **Cap. IX** is *De origine et distinctione capitalium peccatorum*, where *superbia* is established as the root of all sin (`Eccli. 10, 15: Initium omnis peccati est superbia`, that chapter's own n. 2). The cross-reference is internal to Pars III, so the last note of the pars points back into it.
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Preserved as printed, not harmonised.**
- **`praesumtio` and `praesumtio`, never `praesumptio`.** The plate spells it without the `p` at both occurrences (the six differentiae, and `impunitatis praesumtio`), as it does `consummationem` with two `m`. Transcribed as printed.
- **`Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia,` carries the COLON**, as in Capp. IX and X — third consecutive attestation, confirming p. 237's full stop as a one-off. Checked on the band.
- **The em-dash articulation is asymmetric here.** The three theses of the opening are punctuated with ` — ` before the **second and third** (symmetric, as in Cap. X); but the *Aut enim impugnant… / Si in comparatione ad unitatem Ecclesiae… / — Si in comparatione ad Deum… / — Si vero impugnat…* series takes the dash before the **second and third** members only, with the first running on from its own introduction. **Transcribed, not regularised.**
- **`in Patrem` / `in Filium` / `in Spiritum sanctum` are ITALIC on their first appearance and again on their second, but the surrounding `peccatum in Spiritum sanctum` of the running argument is ROMAN** — Quaracchi italicise the phrase only where it is the term being divided. Preserved as printed.
- **`facultatis` / `rationis` / `voluntatis` are italic, but `Patris` / `Filii` / `Spiritus sancti` are roman**, in the same clause. Preserved.
- **`quia rationis`, not `ratione rationis`, in the body** — the editions' `ratione rationis` is recorded in n. 2 and NOT adopted; the body prints `Patris, ratione facultatis; Filii, quia rationis; Spiritus sancti, quia voluntatis`, with the construction changing after the first member. **A body/apparatus divergence that is the whole point of the note; not to be harmonised.**

**Enumerations preserved exactly.** The **six** differentiae of the sin against the Holy Spirit (*invidia fraternae gratiae, impugnatio veritatis agnitae, desperatio, praesumtio, obstinatio mentis, impoenitentia finalis*) — given once in the opening thesis and then re-derived in the same order, three pairs at a time, in the *Ratio*; the **three** theses (appropriation of sin to the Persons; the sense in which it is irremissible; the six differentiae); the **threefold** power of the soul (*irascibilis, rationalis, concupiscibilis*); the **three** defects and three genera of sin (*impotentia / ignorantia / malitia* answering *facultas / ratio / voluntas*); the **twofold** involuntary (*per violentiam / per ignorantiam*); and the **threefold** impugning (*in se / in comparatione ad Deum / in comparatione ad Ecclesiam*), which yields three pairs. None was renumbered or reordered, and the English keeps the Latin's order in every list. **Note that Bonaventure's derivation returns the six differentiae in a DIFFERENT order from the opening enumeration** (the *Ratio* gives them as invidia, impugnatio / desperatio, praesumtio / obstinatio, impoenitentia — pairing them by which of the three they impugn); both orders are printed as they stand.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 240 L — "Thesis 1." · "Thesis 2." · "Thesis 3." · "Ratio." · "Pro thesi 1." · "Tres defectus et tria genera peccati." · "Hinc appropriantur." p. 240 R — "Duplex involuntarium." · "Quid sit peccatum in Spiritum S." · "Pro thesi 2." · "Pro thesi 3." · "Impugnant tria." · "De primo." · "De secundo." · "De tertio." · "Duplex impoenitentia finalis." **p. 241 carries NO gloss beside Cap. XI's closing paragraph** — the first Pars III paragraph of any length to stand unglossed; the glosses resume with Pars IV's "Congruit reparabili tripliciter." further down the page, which is not this chunk's.

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c10`:* **NOTHING.** c10 forwarded no note, and p. 240's register was read here from n. 1. c10's recorded orientations were treated as hints and each re-verified: the `Cap. XI.` heading at the head of p. 240's left column is confirmed; **p. 240's gutter of 1338 is confirmed by independent re-measurement** (and its default-window failure at 1362/13 px reproduced exactly); p. 240's left block does open numbered `¹`. Of c10's provisional readings of p. 240's nn. 1–3, relayed from the raw and explicitly flagged as unsettled, **two were corrected**: n. 2's `excepta 2` (raw `excepta i`) and n. 3's `Cfr. supra p. I. c. 6.` (raw `p. 1.`), plus n. 3's `c. 11.` and `c. 17.` where c10's reading broke off.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p4-c1` (Pars IV, Cap. I, *De ratione, qua Verbum Dei debuit incarnari vel decuit*):* **p. 241 footer notes 3–10 — EIGHT entries, all of them Pars IV's.** Anchors verified on the band as falling in Cap. I's body, below the `PARS QUARTA` heading. Content, for orientation only — read each at 450 dpi and settle every digit yourself: n. 3 `Cfr. III. Sent. d. 1. a. 2. q. 1. 3; d. 20. q. 1. 2. et 6.`; n. 4 `August., de Verbis Apostoli, serm. 176. (alias 10.) c. 5. n. 5: Nemo recreat, nisi qui creat etc. Cfr. tom. III. pag. 28, nota 2. — Superius edd., excepta 2, voci principium praefigunt primum, et 1 Deus pro Deum.`; n. 5 `Cfr. Ioan. 1, 3. et 14. Vide tom. III. pag. 30, nota 5. — Pro curaret A W recrearet, Vat., 1 et 3 repararet…`; n. 6 `Vide Bernard., Serm. 3. in Vigilia Nativit. Domini, n. 8. et Serm. 2. in Nativit. Domini, n. 4. — Seq. ratio est secundum Irenaeum; cfr. tom. III. pag. 19, nota 2.`; n. 7 `Phil. 2, 7.`; n. 8 `D I L M V a primo principio…`; n. 9 `Ioan. 1, 14. Cfr. August., de Vera Relig. c. 16. n. 30. seqq. et c. 55. n. 110…`; n. 10 `Vide supra pag. 183, nota 3. — Edd., excepta 2, statum prioris excellentiae…`. **Every digit there is a serif `1`/`4`, `3`/`5` candidate — none is settled by this note**, and n. 8's `D I L M V` in particular mixes the codex-siglum `I` with letters the raw also flattens.
- *Recorded for `bon-brev-p4-c1`, from bands read here but not owned here:* **`PARS QUARTA / De incarnatione Verbi.` stands part-way down p. 241, NOT at the head of a page**, with Pars III's last paragraph above it and `Cap. I. / De ratione, qua Verbum Dei debuit incarnari vel decuit.` below it; Cap. I opens `Postquam aliqua praedicta sunt de Trinitate Dei, de creatura mundi et de corruptela peccati; restat nunc aliqua breviter dicere de incarnatione Verbi…`. **p. 241's bands already exist** (`raw/vision/vol5/p-241.png`); **use gutter 1228**, not the 1218 the default window reports — see the gutter note above. **p. 241's ten-note register HAS been band-read in full here and is in `KNOWN_TOTALS`; nn. 1–2 are consumed by this chunk and nn. 3–10 are a legitimate forwarded PENDING until `bon-brev-p4-c1` lands.** **p. 241's own gutter runover is NEGATIVE and closed from both sides here** (left block closes complete at n. 5, right block opens numbered `⁶`) — it belongs to `p4-c1`'s ledger line, and **the p. 241 → p. 242 page-crossing test is still open.**

method: LLM-assisted translation from the Quaracchi Latin, verified chunk-by-chunk against the printed plates (apparatus roster, cross-references, page/gutter boundaries).

license_source: Public Domain Mark 1.0

license_translation: CC BY-NC 4.0

license_apparatus: CC BY-NC 4.0