title: Pars 3, Cap. 3

source_text:
<!-- page 232 -->

### Capitulum III. *De primorum parentum transgressione.*

De *culpa* vero primorum parentum haec tenenda sunt, quod mulier, consentiens tentationi diabolicae, appetiit *scientiam* et *excellentiam* ad modum Dei, appetiit nihilominus experiri *suavitatem ligni* vetiti; et tandem incidit in *transgressionem* praecepti. — Nec hoc contenta, offerendo fructum ligni vetiti, induxit virum, qui, nolens delicias suas contristare, mulierem non corripuit, sed potius consensum praebuit male suadenti; et oblatum pomum gustando, factus est transgressor divini mandati[^p232-8].

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia; cum a primo principio, ut supra[^p232-9] dictum fuit, datus esset homini duplex *sensus* et *appetitus* respectu duplicis *libri* et respectu duplicis *boni*, ut secundum libertatem arbitrii homo posset ad utrumque converti; mulier, audita suggestione serpentis exteriori, non recurrit ad librum *interiorem*, qui legibilem se praebet recto iudicio rationis; sed *sensum* suum circa *exteriorem* librum tenuit et circa *exterius bonum* negotiari coepit. Et quia *sensus* eius non accessit ad verum infallibile, *appetitus* eius converti coepit ad bonum commutabile. *Appetiit* ergo quod diabolus promisit, et ideo consensit, ut faceret quod suggessit.

<!-- page 233 -->

Appetendo igitur excellentem *scientiam*, erecta est in *superbiam*, et erecta in *superbiam*, hoc ipso illecta est ad *gulam*; ac per hoc tertio prostrata est per *inobedientiam*. Primum fuit in *mente*, secundum in *sensualitate*, tertium in *operatione*[^p233-1]. — Et sicut *tentatio*, ab *inferiori* incipiens, pervenit usque ad summum, quia ab auditu per appetitum venit ad consensum; sic e converso *deordinatio*, a *superiori* incipiens, pervenit usque ad imum et fecit unum peccatum consummatum, quod in humana natura omnis peccati initium est et origo malorum.

Nam mulier illecta illexit virum, qui similiter ad *librum exteriorem* conversus et ad *bonum commutabile*, nimis appretiando mulieris consortium et suae societatis solatium, nec mulierem voluit *corripere* nec proprias delicias *contristare*. Et quoniam debuit eam *corripere* et non corripuit, idcirco imputatur ei peccatum mulieris. Quia vero noluit suas delicias *contristare*, a se repellendo mulierem; incepit nimium se ipsum diligere, ac per hoc recedens a divina amicitia incidit in *gulam* et *inobedientiam*.

Fuit ergo transgressio praecepti utrique communis, licet ex alia et alia causa, quia non vir, sed *mulier seducta fuit*[^p233-2]; in utroque tamen, scilicet viro et muliere, fuit deordinatio a summo usque ad imum, quia primo in *mente* sive in ratione, deinde in *sensualitate* et postremo in *opere*. Ideo enim uterque prostratus fuit per *inobedientiam* et illectus per *gulam*, quia uterque erectus fuit in *superbiam*, mulier quidem appetendo et ambiendo quod nondum acceperat, vir nimis amando et appretiando quod iam habebat; unde mulier manducando credidit sublimari, Adam vero, existimans se aliquid magnum et Deo carum, minus graviter puniri. Nondum enim expertus fuerat rigorem divinae severitatis[^p233-3]. — Et sic uterque, dum inordinate se erexit *supra se*, cecidit miserabiliter *infra se* a statu innocentiae et gratiae ad statum culpae et miseriae.

---

english:
### Chapter III. *On the transgression of the first parents.*

Concerning the *guilt* of the first parents, however, these things are to be held: that the woman, consenting to the diabolical temptation, desired *knowledge* and *excellence* after the manner of God, and desired nonetheless to experience the *sweetness of the* forbidden *tree*; and at last fell into the *transgression* of the precept. — Nor content with this, by offering the fruit of the forbidden tree she led on the man, who, unwilling to sadden his own delights, did not rebuke the woman but rather gave consent to her who was persuading him to evil; and by tasting the apple offered him, became a transgressor of the divine command[^p232-8].

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since, when from the first principle, as was said above[^p232-9], there had been given to man a twofold *sense* and *appetite* in respect of a twofold *book* and in respect of a twofold *good*, so that according to the freedom of choice man might be able to turn to either; the woman, having heard the outward suggestion of the serpent, did not have recourse to the *inner* book, which offers itself legible to the right judgment of reason; but held her *sense* about the *outer* book and began to traffic about the *outward good*. And because her *sense* did not attain to the infallible truth, her *appetite* began to be turned to the changeable good. She *desired*, therefore, what the devil promised, and therefore consented, so as to do what he suggested.

<!-- page 233 -->

Desiring, then, excellent *knowledge*, she was raised up into *pride*, and being raised up into *pride*, by that very fact she was enticed to *gluttony*; and thereby, in the third place, she was laid low through *disobedience*. The first was in the *mind*, the second in the *sensuality*, the third in the *deed*[^p233-1]. — And just as the *temptation*, beginning from the lower, arrived as far as the highest, because from the hearing it came through the appetite to consent; so conversely the *disordering*, beginning from the higher, arrived as far as the lowest and made one consummated sin, which in human nature is the beginning of every sin and the origin of evils.

For the woman, enticed, enticed the man, who likewise, turned to the *outer book* and to the *changeable good*, valuing too much the woman's companionship and the solace of her society, willed neither to *rebuke* the woman nor to *sadden* his own delights. And since he ought to have *rebuked* her and did not rebuke her, on that account the woman's sin is imputed to him. But because he was unwilling to *sadden* his delights by driving the woman from himself, he began to love himself too much, and thereby, withdrawing from the divine friendship, fell into *gluttony* and *disobedience*.

The transgression of the precept was therefore common to both, though from one cause and another, since it was not the man but the *woman* who *was seduced*[^p233-2]; yet in both, namely in the man and in the woman, there was a disordering from the highest as far as the lowest, because first in the *mind* or in reason, then in the *sensuality*, and last in the *deed*. For therefore each was laid low through *disobedience* and enticed through *gluttony*, because each was raised up into *pride* — the woman indeed by desiring and courting what she had not yet received, the man by loving and valuing too much what he already had; whence the woman by eating believed she would be exalted, but Adam, reckoning himself something great and dear to God, believed he would be punished less gravely. For he had not yet experienced the rigor of the divine severity[^p233-3]. — And thus each of them, while inordinately raising himself *above himself*, fell miserably *below himself*, from the state of innocence and grace to the state of guilt and misery.

---

la: Cfr. II. Sent. lit. Magistri, d. XXII. c. 1-4, et Comment. a. 1.

en: Cf. II *Sent.*, the Master's text, d. XXII, c. 1-4, and the Commentary on the same, a. 1.

la: Partis II. c. 11. — Inferius post *sed* edd. cum aliquot codd. addunt *potius*, et verbo *negotiari* E praemittit *evagari vel* (H *vagari* pro *negotiari*).

en: Of Part II, c. 11. — Below, after *sed*, the editions together with some codices add *potius*, and to the word *negotiari* E prefixes *evagari vel* (H has *vagari* for *negotiari*).

la: Plures codd. et edd. *opere*. Aliquanto inferius voci *malorum* A praefigit *omnium*, et pro *illexit* M N *allexit*.

en: Several codices and the editions have *opere*. Somewhat below, before the word *malorum* A places *omnium*, and for *illexit* M N have *allexit*.

la: Epist. I. Tim. 2, 14: Et Adam non est seductus, mulier autem seducta in praevaricatione fuit. — Inferius pro *fuit in superbiam* K L M P Q U V *per superbiam*.

en: I Timothy 2:14: And Adam was not seduced, but the woman, being seduced, was in the transgression. — Below, for *fuit in superbiam* K L M P Q U V have *per superbiam*.

la: August., XIV. de Civ. Dei, c. 11. n. 2: Inexpertus divinae severitatis [Adam] in eo falli potuit, ut veniale crederet esse commissum... Etsi credendo [serpentis verbo] non sunt ambo decepti, peccando tamen ambo sunt capti et diaboli laqueis implicati. — Edd. *divinae iustitiae et severitatis*, quae etiam paulo ante *credidit se puniendum* pro *puniri*. Pro *aliquid magnum* A Q et 2 *aliquem magnum*. Mox plures codd., inter quos A L M S T, omittunt *inordinate*, et D L O Q T U *in statum* pro *ad statum*.

en: Augustine, *City of God* XIV, c. 11, n. 2: "Inexperienced in the divine severity, [Adam] could be deceived in this, that he believed what was committed to be venial... Although in believing [the serpent's word] both were not deceived, yet in sinning both were taken captive and entangled in the devil's snares." — The editions read *divinae iustitiae et severitatis*, which also a little before have *credidit se puniendum* for *puniri*. For *aliquid magnum* A Q and 2 have *aliquem magnum*. Shortly after, several codices, among them A L M S T, omit *inordinate*, and D L O Q T U have *in statum* for *ad statum*. ---

translators_notes:
**Page span, established positively.** Cap. III opens in the **right** column of p. 232, under the heading `Cap. III. / De primorum parentum transgressione.`, immediately below the close of Cap. II. It fills the rest of that column, breaking **mid-word** at `…Appetendo igitur excellentem scien-`, and resumes at the head of p. 233's **left** column (`tiam, erecta est in superbiam…`). It closes in that same left column at `…ad statum culpae et miseriae.`, well above the column foot. **The end is fixed positively by the `Cap. IV. / De primorum parentum punitione.` heading standing at the head of p. 233's right column** — not by the white space below the left column's last line, which is exactly the ★★ trap that cost `bon-brev-p2-c4` a paragraph. Cap. III therefore claims no text in p. 233's right column at all. The running head of p. 233 reads `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. IV.`, naming the page's **last** capitulum per the standing rule.

**Gutter.** p. 232 was measured at **x≈1337** (60 px low-ink run) by `bon-brev-p3-c2`; its bands were reused unchanged. **p. 233 measured x≈1211 (52 px run, page 2571×3823)**, auto-measured by `colcrop.py vol5 233` with no constant passed, and confirmed visually — both columns crop clean with no bleed either way, and the run width is comfortably above the ~15 px failure threshold. No parity reasoning was used (the parity model is spent), and 1211 would in any case have been unpredictable from p. 232's 1337.

**Raw-quality verdict, split by region and by page.**
- **p. 232 — body CLEAN, footer USABLE BUT FLATTENED.** Already established by `p3-c2`; this chunk's share of the page (Cap. III's first two paragraphs, and footer nn. 8–9) confirmed the same: the body carried only ordinary garbles (`inulier`, `exccUciitium`, `iiKMlum`, `contrist:iri`, `poinuin`, `mandali`, `Iiomini`, `iiulicr`, `sernentis`, `hbrum`, `iid Imnuin`), while the footer flattened `H` to `II` in n. 9 exactly as forwarded.
- **p. 233 — body USABLE BUT NOTICEABLY DEGRADED, footer USABLE BUT FLATTENED.** p. 233's body is a step worse than p. 232's: not cascade-fragmented (so it still served as a base with the bands as the check), but with heavy character loss — `oi'ecla esl in ■viperbiam`, `l)ervenit iisqne`, `1'iiiniiin tiiit in rwentev`, `djk'nUionc`, `alaudita`-class dropouts, `Qiiomodo librum crleriorem`, `apprctiando`, `i^ocietatis`, `impntatiir`, `mnlier`, `existimaBS`, `habelMt`, `.\dam`, `fueral`. **Every reading below was settled on the band, not on the raw.** Its footer flattens sigla in the familiar way (`\` for `A`, `(j` for `Q`, `0` for `O`, `lOo` for `105`, `li` for `14`, `II` for `11`).

**Apparatus (5 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** p. 232 carries **9** footer notes; only **nn. 8 and 9** anchor in this capitulum — `divini mandati`⁸ and `ut supra`⁹, both verified on the p. 232 right footer band rather than taken on trust, and both falling after the `Cap. III.` heading. p. 233 carries **5** footer notes. Anchors on the band: `operatione`¹, `mulier seducta fuit`², `divinae severitatis`³ — all three in the **left** column, all three inside Cap. III — then `fecerunt sibi perizomata`⁴ and `relabatur`⁵, both in the **right** column and both inside Cap. IV. p. 233's split is therefore **3 mine / 2 forwarded**.

**★ The left footer block again overran the column division.** p. 233's **left** footer block holds nn. **1–4** — and n. 4's anchor (`perizomata`, Gen. 3, 7) is in the **right** column, inside Cap. IV. This is the fourth occurrence of the standing finding (pp. 220, 221, 226, now 233): the left block fills first, numbering follows reading order across the page, and a note's anchor column can never be inferred from which block holds it. The two pages of Pars III that looked like a clean left/right correspondence (231, 232) were coincidence, as `p3-c2` warned.

**Runover findings — three tests, one POSITIVE, closed from both sides.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 232 → p. 233 (the test `p3-c2` left open, and this chunk's to close).* p. 232's last entry, n. 9, closes on a complete clause (`…(H vagari pro negotiari).`), **and p. 233's left footer opens with a numbered entry `¹`** — no unnumbered fragment stands at its head. **NEGATIVE; the test is now closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 233, my own last entry.* n. 3 closes complete (`…D L O Q T U in statum pro ad statum.`) and is followed in the same left block by a numbered `⁴`. **NEGATIVE.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 233, **POSITIVE**: **p. 233 n. 4 runs over the gutter**.* The left block's last entry, n. 4, breaks at `…alii cum edd. substituunt primorum parentum (omisso inflicta).` and the **right** footer block opens with an **unnumbered** continuation, `Inferius pro resolutionis in cinerem R incinerationis (Q ib addit vel incinerationis), qui etiam inferius pro scilicet ligni vetiti esus substituit inobedientiae primorum parentum (D addit ibi vel inobedientiae primorum parentum). Pro licet fuerit multi codd. licet esset.`, before the numbered `⁵` (Boeth., IV. de Consol. prosa 6). Confirmed from both sides. **The note itself belongs to `bon-brev-p3-c4`, but the event is logged on this chunk's line in `manual-review/vol5-runover-ledger.tsv` because it was found here — c4 must NOT log it a second time.** ⚠ The printer's signature line `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` sits between n. 4's left-block text and the foot of the left column; it is *not* an entry and does not interrupt the runover.
- Only one footnote series runs on each page: ordinals ascend in reading order across the page, none falls out of column order, and every entry's content is reachable by an anchor in the body above it.

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands.**
- **p. 233 n. 1 — the siglum is `A`.** The raw prints a bare backslash and the band's glyph is a Λ whose crossbar is largely inked out at 450 dpi (zoom-checked). Read as **A**: the Breviloquium's sigla are letters, Λ is not among them, and the same footer's n. 3 prints `A Q et 2` and `A L M S T` with the crossbar intact. Recorded here rather than flagged, because the reading rests on the siglum set, not on the ink.
- **p. 233 n. 2 — `Epist. I. Tim. 2, 14`.** The band's `14` prints like `1i`/`4`; the citation's own sense settles it — 1 Tim. 2:14 *is* `Et Adam non est seductus, mulier autem seducta in praevaricatione fuit`, which the note then quotes in full.
- **p. 233 n. 2 — `K L M P Q U V`.** Read on the band; `K`, not the raw-chronic `R`.
- **p. 233 n. 3 — `XIV. de Civ. Dei, c. 11. n. 2`.** The raw prints `c. II.`; the band prints digits. *De civitate Dei* XIV.11 is the chapter that argues Adam was not deceived but yielded, which is exactly the passage quoted, so the number tests right against its own sense.
- **p. 233 n. 3 — `D L O Q T U`.** Raw `D L 0 (j T U`; band gives O and Q.
- **p. 233 n. 4 (forwarded) — `Alex. Hal., S. p. II. q. 105.`, `ibid. v. 17`, `ibid. v. 16`.** Raw gives `q. lOo` and `S. p. 11.`; band read for c4's benefit.
- **p. 232 nn. 8–9 — `d. XXII. c. 1-4`, `Partis II. c. 11.`, `H vagari`.** All re-verified on the band exactly as `p3-c2` forwarded them, including the `H` the raw flattens to `II`.
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Body readings settled off the bands.** `appetiit scientiam et excellentiam ad modum Dei` (raw `exccUciitium ad iiKMlum`); `nolens delicias suas contristare` (raw `contrist:iri`); `oblatum pomum gustando` (raw `poinuin`); `transgressor divini mandati` (raw `inandali`); `datus esset homini duplex sensus` (raw `Iiomini`); `audita suggestione serpentis` (raw `sernentis`); `erecta est in superbiam` (raw `oi'ecla esl in ■viperbiam`); `Primum fuit in mente` (raw `1'iiiniiin tiiit in rwentev`); `tertium in operatione` (raw `djk'nUionc` — the printed word is *operatione*, and n. 1 confirms it by recording *opere* as the variant); `nimis appretiando mulieris consortium` (raw `apprctiando`, `mnlieris`); `idcirco imputatur ei peccatum` (raw `impntatiir oi`); `existimans se aliquid magnum` (raw `existimaBS`); `quod iam habebat` (raw `habelMt`); `Adam vero` (raw `.\dam`); `expertus fuerat rigorem` (raw `fueral`).

**One thing deliberately preserved, not harmonised.** The printed text of the second paragraph reads `Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia; cum a primo principio…` — with a **semicolon** after *quia*, where the parallel sentence in Cap. II (p. 232) prints a comma. Both the band and the raw carry the semicolon here. Left as printed; a polish pass must not normalise it.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 232 R — "De peccato mulieris." · "De peccato viri." · "Ratio." · "Quomodo mulier peccavit." p. 233 L — "Via deordinationis." · "Quomodo vir peccaverit." · "De peccato utriusque."

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c2`:* p. 232 footer notes **8** and **9**, anchored on `divini mandati`⁸ and `ut supra`⁹ — both re-verified on the p. 232 right footer band, and both carried here as this chunk's first two entries. The page-crossing runover test c2 left open on n. 9 is **closed, negative**.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c4`:* p. 233 footer notes **4** and **5**, anchored on `fecerunt sibi perizomata`⁴ and `relabatur`⁵ in Cap. IV (*De primorum parentum punitione*), which opens at the head of p. 233's **right** column and is **not** complete on p. 233 — its body runs to the foot of that column and continues on p. 234. **n. 4's gutter-crossing runover is already established and already logged on this chunk's ledger line — do not re-test it as an open question and do not log it again.** p. 233's footer register is fully consumed by c3 + c4, so nothing else on that page is outstanding.


site: bonaventure

collection: Breviloquium

title: Pars 3, Cap. 4

title_alt:
De primorum parentum punitione
On the punishment of the first parents

author: St. Bonaventure

languages: en la

title: Opera Omnia (Quaracchi critical edition)

publisher: Collegii S. Bonaventurae

source_text:
<!-- page 233 -->

### Capitulum IV. *De primorum parentum punitione.*

De *poena* autem primis parentibus inflicta hoc tenendum est, quod vir et mulier statim post *culpam* senserunt *poenam* rebellionis et erubescentiae in carne; et ideo ad cooperiendum verenda *fecerunt sibi perizomata*[^p233-4]. — Post autem divino iudicio vir incurrit poenam *laboris* et angustiae, poenam *famis* et indigentiae, poenam *mortis* et resolutionis in cinerem; sicut dicit Scriptura: *Maledicta terra in opere tuo* etc. — *Mulieri* autem *duplicata* est poena, quia inflicta est ei poenalitas multiplicium *aerumnarum* in conceptu, poena *dolorum* in partu, poena quoque *subiectionis* ad virum in convictu; ac per hoc, secundum quod apparet, satis graviter punitum fuit illud peccatum, scilicet ligni vetiti esus, licet fuerit faciliter perpetratum.

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum primum principium sit providentissimum in gubernando et rectissimum in praesidendo, nihil prorsus in universo dimittit inordinatum; et quia culpa recte ordinatur in poena, ideo statim in primis parentibus *dedecus peccati* subsecutum est *decus iudicii*, ut quod inordinatum fuit cadendo ab ordine naturae caderet statim in ordinem iustitiae. Hic enim duplex ordo sic cuncta complectitur, ut quod ab uno ceciderit in alterum relabatur[^p233-5].

Quoniam ergo uterque parens, superbiendo in mente et gustando in carne, inobediens fuit suo superiori, iusto Dei iudicio factum est, ut sibi fieret *inobediens* suum inferius, et maxime quantum ad partes illas, secundum quas est coniunctio utriusque sexus, quae sunt membra deservientia virtuti generativae. Et quia hoc inerat eis non ex natura, sed ex propria culpa; ideo erubescebant et cooperiebant se.

<!-- page 234 -->

Rursus, quia vir, spreto summo delectabili, quaesivit in carne delectari; ideo iusto Dei iudicio inflictus est ei *labor* et *defectus famis et sitis*.

Postremo, quia propter bonum carnis separari elegit a bono mentis, ideo iusto Dei iudicio anima invita separatur a carne per *mortem* et *incinerationem*; ac per hoc, sicut Deus dederat homini secundum ordinem naturae corpus *subiectum* animae, *propagabile* sine libidine, *vegetabile* sine defectione, *immutabile* sine morte interveniente; sic, homine peccante, secundum ordinem iustitiae factum est[^p234-1], ut subtraheret cuncta praedicta et infligeret opposita; ut sic culpa non remaneret impunita et inordinata, quod nequaquam pati debet divina providentia.

Et quoniam a muliere peccatum sumsit exordium; ideo poena ipsius *geminatur*. Quia enim superbiens fuit in mente, incurrit *subiectionem*; quia vidit et appetiit lignum ad vescendum suave, incurrit *dolorem*; postremo, quia fregit iugum obedientiae, incurrit vinculum et pondus *multiplicis aerumnae*.

Et sic patet, quanto ordine divinae providentiae inflictae sunt multiplices poenae *viro* et duplicatae in *muliere*, ut sic « dedecus peccati non esset sine decore iustitiae[^p234-2] ».

---

english:
### Chapter IV. *On the punishment of the first parents.*

Concerning the *punishment* inflicted on the first parents, this is to be held: that the man and the woman, immediately after the *guilt*, felt the *punishment* of rebellion and of shame in the flesh; and therefore, to cover their shameful parts, *they made themselves girdles*[^p233-4]. — But afterwards, by the divine judgment, the man incurred the punishment of *labor* and of straitness, the punishment of *hunger* and of want, the punishment of *death* and of dissolution into ash; as Scripture says: *Cursed is the earth in thy work*, etc. — But for the *woman* the punishment was *doubled*, because there was inflicted on her the penalty of manifold *hardships* in conception, the punishment of *pains* in childbirth, and also the punishment of *subjection* to the man in their life together; and thereby, according as it appears, that sin — namely the eating of the forbidden tree — was punished gravely enough, although it was easily perpetrated.

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since the first principle is most provident in governing and most upright in presiding, it lets nothing at all in the universe go undisposed; and since guilt is rightly ordered into punishment, therefore straightway in the first parents the *disgrace of sin* was followed by the *comeliness of judgment*, so that what was disordered by falling from the order of nature should fall straightway into the order of justice. For this twofold order so embraces all things that whatever falls away from the one falls back into the other[^p233-5].

Since, therefore, each parent, by growing proud in mind and by tasting in the flesh, was disobedient to his superior, it was brought about by the just judgment of God that his own inferior should become *disobedient* to him, and most of all as regards those parts according to which there is the joining of either sex, which are the members serving the generative power. And because this was in them not from nature but from their own guilt, therefore they blushed and covered themselves.

<!-- page 234 -->

Again, because the man, having spurned the highest delightful thing, sought to be delighted in the flesh; therefore by the just judgment of God there was inflicted on him *labor* and the *failing of hunger and thirst*.

Last, because for the good of the flesh he chose to be separated from the good of the mind, therefore by the just judgment of God the soul is unwillingly separated from the flesh through *death* and *reduction to ashes*; and thereby, just as God had given to man, according to the order of nature, a body *subject* to the soul, *propagable* without lust, *capable of growth* without failing, *unchangeable* without the intervention of death; so, man having sinned, it was brought about according to the order of justice[^p234-1] that He should withdraw all the foresaid things and inflict their opposites; so that thus guilt should not remain unpunished and disordered, which the divine providence ought in no way to suffer.

And since from the woman the sin took its beginning; therefore her punishment is *doubled*. For because she was proud in mind, she incurred *subjection*; because she saw and desired the tree as sweet for eating, she incurred *pain*; last, because she broke the yoke of obedience, she incurred the bond and the weight of *manifold hardship*.

And thus it is clear with how great an order of divine providence the manifold punishments were inflicted on the *man* and doubled in the *woman*, so that thus « the disgrace of sin should not be without the comeliness of justice[^p234-2] ».

---

la: Gen. 3, 7. — Seq. locus est ibid. v. 17. Poena *mulieris* insinuatur ibid. v. 16. — Cfr. Alex. Hal., S. p. II. q. 105. per totam. — In principio cap. secuti sumus S, dum alii codd. omittunt vel *primis parentibus inflicta*, vel *primis parentibus*, alii cum edd. substituunt *primorum parentum* (omisso *inflicta*). Inferius pro *resolutionis in cinerem* R *incinerationis* (Q ib addit *vel incinerationis*), qui etiam inferius pro *scilicet ligni vetiti esus* substituit *inobedientiae primorum parentum* (D addit ibi *vel inobedientiae primorum parentum*). Pro *licet fuerit* multi codd. *licet esset*.

en: Genesis 3:7. — The following passage is in the same place, v. 17. The punishment of the *woman* is intimated in the same place, v. 16. — Cf. Alexander of Hales, *Summa*, p. II, q. 105, throughout. — At the beginning of the chapter we have followed S, while other codices omit either *primis parentibus inflicta* or *primis parentibus*, and others together with the editions substitute *primorum parentum* (omitting *inflicta*). Below, for *resolutionis in cinerem* R has *incinerationis* (Q there adds *vel incinerationis*), which likewise below substitutes for *scilicet ligni vetiti esus* the words *inobedientiae primorum parentum* (D there adds *vel inobedientiae primorum parentum*). For *licet fuerit* many codices have *licet esset*.

la: Boeth., IV. de Consol. prosa 6: Ordo enim quidam cuncta complectitur, ut quod ab assignata ordinis ratione discesserit, hoc idem, licet in alium, tamen in ordinem relabatur, ne quid in regno providentiae liceat temeritati. August., Epist. 140. (alias 120.) c. 2. n. 4: Qui enim iniuste se ordinat in peccatis, iuste ordinatur in poenis. Cfr. supra pag. 224, nota 8. et I. Sent. d. 46. q. 5. seq. — Secuti sumus A D E S, alii codd. et edd. *in* [Vat., 1 et 3 *statim in*] *alteram differentiam* [T *partem*] *relabatur*. H quaedam nullius momenti addit. Superius post *in poena* edd. cum uno alteroque cod. addunt: convenientius enim iniustus dolet [2 addit *tantum*] in supplicio, quam [A *qui*] laetatus [2: *quantum delectatus*] est in delicto, quoniam melius est dolere damnum salutis, quam laetari in damno aequitatis.

en: Boethius, *On the Consolation of Philosophy* IV, prose 6: "For a certain order embraces all things, so that whatever has departed from the assigned plan of order, this same thing — albeit into another — nevertheless falls back into an order, lest anything in the kingdom of providence be left to rashness." Augustine, *Letter* 140 (otherwise 120), c. 2, n. 4: "For he who orders himself unjustly in sins is justly ordered in punishments." Cf. above, p. 224, note 8, and I *Sent.*, d. 46, q. 5 f. — We have followed A D E S; other codices and the editions read *in* [the Vatican edition, 1 and 3: *statim in*] *alteram differentiam* [T: *partem*] *relabatur*. H adds some things of no moment. Above, after *in poena*, the editions together with one or two codices add: "for the unjust man more fittingly grieves [2 adds *only*] in his punishment than he rejoiced [A: *who rejoiced*; 2: *than he was delighted*] in his misdeed, since it is better to grieve at the loss of salvation than to rejoice at the loss of equity."

la: Plurimi codd. et 2 omittunt *factum est, ut*, quae lectio eligi posset, si etiam in codd. mox substitueretur *subtraxit* et *inflixit*. [Pro *homine peccante* F *homini peccanti*, B M *ab homine peccante*]. Inferius vocibus *divina providentia* Q U interserunt *sapientia et* [U *vel*], et pro *ipsius geminatur* edd. cum uno alteroque cod. *eius debuit duplicari* [Q addit *et geminari*, 2 substituit *multiplicari*].

en: Very many codices and 2 omit *factum est, ut*, which reading could have been chosen if in the codices as well *subtraxit* and *inflixit* were then substituted. [For *homine peccante* F has *homini peccanti*, B M *ab homine peccante*.] Below, between the words *divina providentia* Q U insert *sapientia et* [U *vel*], and for *ipsius geminatur* the editions together with one or two codices have *eius debuit duplicari* [Q adds *et geminari*, 2 substitutes *multiplicari*].

la: Secundum August.; vide supra pag. 224, nota 8. — Edd. solae addunt: *Tanta est enim beatitudo iustitiae, ut nemo ab ea nisi ad miseriam possit abscedere.*

en: According to Augustine; see above, p. 224, note 8. — The editions alone add: *For so great is the blessedness of justice that no one can depart from it except unto misery.* ---

translators_notes:
**Page span, established positively.** Cap. IV opens at the head of p. 233's **right** column, under the heading `Cap. IV. / De primorum parentum punitione.` — the same heading by which `bon-brev-p3-c3` fixed its own end. It fills that whole right column, ending it at `…ideo erubescebant et cooperiebant se.`, and resumes at the head of p. 234's **left** column (`Rursus, quia vir, spreto summo delectabili…`). **It closes in that same left column, at `« dedecus peccati non esset sine decore iustitiae² ».`, and the end is fixed positively by the `Cap. V. / De originalis peccati corruptione.` heading standing immediately below it in the SAME left column** — not by any white space. Cap. V therefore opens on p. 234's left column, not at the head of a fresh column or page, and Cap. IV claims **no** text in p. 234's right column at all. The break between the two pages is at a paragraph boundary, not mid-word. Running heads: p. 233 `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. IV.`, p. 234 `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. V.` — each naming its page's **last** capitulum, per the standing rule.

**Gutter.** p. 233 was measured at **x≈1211** (52 px low-ink run) by `bon-brev-p3-c3`; re-run here by `colcrop.py vol5 233` with no constant passed and it returned the same value. **p. 234 measured x≈1341 (63 px run, page 2571×3823)**, auto-measured by `colcrop.py vol5 234`, no constant passed, and confirmed visually — both columns crop clean, no bleed either way, and 63 px is comfortably above the ~15 px failure threshold. No parity reasoning was used: the parity model is spent, 1341 sits inside the ~1230–1370 overlap zone, and it was in no way predictable from p. 233's 1211 one page earlier.

**Raw-quality verdict, split by region and by page.**
- **p. 233 — body USABLE BUT NOTICEABLY DEGRADED, footer USABLE BUT FLATTENED.** The verdict `p3-c3` recorded for the left column holds for the right column too: not cascade-fragmented, so still serviceable as a base with the bands as the check, but with heavy character loss (`\h' poena antem priiiiis paronliliiis indicla lioc`, `senscriint`, `('rubescenliac`, `C(x)|)erieiidum`, `perizormta`, `iinlicio`, `iiiciiirit`, `rcsoliitionis`, `Scrii^liira`, `autism duplicula`, `mullipliciiiin`, `pocnalitas`, `punitnm fuit itliid ijeccatum`, `Uic cnim duplex ordo`, `iiierat *is`, `erubescclKint`). Every reading below was settled on the band. Its footer flattens sigla and digits in the familiar way (`It` for `R`, `II` for `H`, `((.` for `q.`, `UO` for `140`, `22t` for `224`).
- **p. 234 — body CLEAN, footer CLEAN.** A sharp step back up from p. 233 in both regions, and the strongest evidence yet for the standing rule that raw quality is a **per-page, per-region** fact in this volume and never a volume-wide one. p. 234's body carries only ordinary garbles (`deleclabili`, `quaeslvil iri carne`, `?norteHi`, `?ie»2;acper`, `bomini`, `suhiectum`, `propagahile`, `immulabile`, `estS'`, `dlum`, `geminutur`, `duplicalae`, `mulicre`); its footer required **no** band correction at all — the only thing the raw dropped there was, as always, the numerals themselves.

**Apparatus (4 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** p. 233 carries **5** footer notes and p. 234 carries **9**; this chunk owns four of the fourteen. Anchors verified on the bands, never inferred from page coverage:
- p. 233 n. **4** on `fecerunt sibi perizomata`⁴ and n. **5** on `relabatur`⁵ — both in p. 233's **right** column, inside Cap. IV. p. 233's split is **3 to `p3-c3` / 2 mine**, and p. 233's register is now fully consumed.
- p. 234 n. **1** on `secundum ordinem iustitiae factum est`¹ and n. **2** on `sine decore iustitiae`² — both in p. 234's **left** column, inside Cap. IV.
- p. 234 nn. **3–9** all anchor in Cap. V (n. 3 on `tertio modus curationis`³ and n. 4 on `natura filius irae`⁴, both still in the **left** column; nn. 5–9 in the **right** column). **All seven are forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c5`.** p. 234's split is therefore **2 mine / 7 forwarded**.

**Footer-block layout on p. 234 — the left block UNDERRAN the column division, the mirror image of p. 233.** p. 234's **left** footer block holds nn. **1–3** and its **right** block holds nn. **4–9** — but n. 4's anchor (`filius irae`, Eph. 2, 3) is in the **left** column, three lines into Cap. V. So on p. 234 the left block stopped short of its own column's notes, exactly as on pp. 220/221/226/233 it ran past them. Both directions are now attested, which settles the standing method note in its strongest form: **the blocks merely fill in turn; numbering follows reading order across the page; a note's anchor column can never be inferred from which block holds it, in either direction.** No printer's signature line falls on p. 234 (p. 233 carried one — `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` plus the sheet number `30` — and it was correctly excluded from that page's count of 5).

**Runover findings — three tests, all NEGATIVE, each closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 233 (the CONFIRMED POSITIVE inherited from `p3-c3`).* p. 233 n. 4's unnumbered continuation heading the right footer block is rendered JOINED into the p. 233 n. 4 entry above, and was re-verified on both bands. **This event was found and logged on `bon-brev-p3-c3`'s ledger line and is deliberately NOT logged again here** — re-logging it is precisely the double-count the ledger exists to prevent. It is not counted among this chunk's three tests.
- *Page-crossing, p. 233 → p. 234 (the open test `p3-c3` handed forward, and this chunk's to close).* p. 233's last entry, n. 5, closes on a complete clause (`…quam laetari in damno aequitatis.`), **and p. 234's left footer block opens with a numbered entry `¹`** — no unnumbered fragment stands at its head. **NEGATIVE; closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 234.* The left block's last entry, n. 3 (`De his agitur hic et 2 seqq. capp.`), is complete, and the **right** block opens with a numbered `⁴`. **NEGATIVE.**
- *This chunk's own last entry.* p. 234 n. 2 is not p. 234's last entry — n. 3 follows it in the same block, numbered — so nothing is left open on my side. **NEGATIVE.**
- Only one footnote series runs on each page: ordinals ascend in reading order across the page, none falls out of column order, and every entry's content is reachable by an anchor in the body above it.

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands.**
- **p. 233 n. 5 — `I. Sent. d. 46. q. 5. seq.`** The raw prints `d. 46. ((. 3. sei(.`; the band, zoom-checked at 450 dpi, prints an unambiguous **5**. This is the chronic serif `3`/`5` family, caught here exactly where the incoming hand-off had already read it as 5.
- **p. 233 n. 5 — `August., Epist. 140. (alias 120.)`** Raw `Ejiist. UO.`; both numbers open with the serif `1` that prints like a `4`. Zoom-checked, and the citation's own sense settles it: Augustine's *Epist.* 140 (*De gratia Novi Testamenti*) **is** the letter numbered 120 in the older series, and c. 2 n. 4 is where *Qui enim iniuste se ordinat in peccatis, iuste ordinatur in poenis* stands.
- **p. 233 n. 5 — `Cfr. supra pag. 224, nota 8.`** Raw `pag. 22t`; band gives 224. Independently right: p. 234 n. 2 sends the reader to the *same* note for the *same* Augustinian tag, so the two citations corroborate each other.
- **p. 233 n. 5 — `R incinerationis`, `H quaedam nullius momenti addit`, `A D E S`, `[Vat., 1 et 3 statim in]`, `[T partem]`, `[A qui]`.** Raw gives `It incinerationis` and `II quaedam` — the settled `II`→`H` correspondence, now a fifth time — and flattens the bracketed `1 et 3`. All read on the band.
- **p. 233 n. 4 — `Alex. Hal., S. p. II. q. 105.`, `ibid. v. 17`, `ibid. v. 16`.** Raw `S. p. 11. q. lOo`; band read. Both verse numbers sense-check: Gen. 3:17 is *Maledicta terra in opere tuo*, which the body quotes on the very next line, and Gen. 3:16 is the woman's sentence, which the note is naming.
- **p. 234 nn. 1–2 — no band correction needed.** `F homini peccanti`, `B M ab homine peccante`, `Q U interserunt`, `[U vel]`, `[Q addit et geminari, 2 substituit multiplicari]`, `pag. 224, nota 8.` all print cleanly in the raw and were confirmed rather than corrected on the band.
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Body readings settled off the bands** (p. 233's right column only; p. 234's body needed none). `De poena autem primis parentibus inflicta` (raw `\h' poena antem priiiiis paronliliiis indicla`); `senserunt poenam rebellionis et erubescentiae` (raw `senscriint`, `('rubescenliac`); `ad cooperiendum verenda` (raw `C(x)|)erieiidum`); `fecerunt sibi perizomata` (raw `perizormta`); `divino iudicio vir incurrit` (raw `iinlicio`, `iiiciiirit`); `resolutionis in cinerem` (raw `rcsoliitionis`); `Mulieri autem duplicata est poena` (raw `Muiieri autism duplicula`); `poenalitas multiplicium aerumnarum` (raw `pocnalitas`, `mullipliciiiin`); `punitum fuit illud peccatum` (raw `punitnm fuit itliid ijeccatum`); `Hic enim duplex ordo` (raw `Uic cnim`); `hoc inerat eis` (raw `iiierat *is`); `erubescebant et cooperiebant se` (raw `erubescclKint`).

**Cross-reference worth carrying, not a divergence inside this chunk.** Cap. IV's closing quotation, `« dedecus peccati non esset sine decore iustitiae »`, is the same Augustinian tag whose *iustitiae*/*vindictae* divergence `bon-brev-p2-c7` preserved and flagged: p. 234 n. 2 does not restate the true words but sends the reader to **p. 224, nota 8**, which is exactly the note that records them. Nothing is harmonised here — the body prints *iustitiae* and the note prints only its pointer, and both stand as printed.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 233 R — "Poena 1." · "Poena 2. multiplex." · "Poena mulieri duplicata." · "Ratio." · "Poena reordinat." · "De poena 1." p. 234 L — "De poena 2. multiplici." · "De poena mulieris."

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c3`:* p. 233 footer notes **4** and **5**, anchored on `fecerunt sibi perizomata`⁴ and `relabatur`⁵ in p. 233's right column — both re-verified on the p. 233 footer bands, both carried here, and n. 4 rendered JOINED with its unnumbered gutter-crossing continuation. The runover event itself stays logged on `p3-c3`'s ledger line. The page-crossing test c3 left open on n. 5 is **closed, negative**.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c5`:* p. 234 footer notes **3 through 9** (seven entries), anchored in Cap. V (*De originalis peccati corruptione*), which opens **in p. 234's left column**, immediately below Cap. IV's last line, and continues into p. 234's right column and beyond. n. 3 = `De his agitur hic et 2 seqq. capp.` (on `tertio modus curationis`³) and n. 4 = `Eph. 2, 3` + Anselm/Bede cross-references (on `natura filius irae`⁴) both anchor in the **left** column but n. 4 sits in the **right** footer block — check that split on the band rather than assuming it. Nothing else on either page is outstanding: p. 233's register is fully consumed by c3 + c4, and p. 234's by c4 + c5.

method: LLM-assisted translation from the Quaracchi Latin, verified chunk-by-chunk against the printed plates (apparatus roster, cross-references, page/gutter boundaries).

license_source: Public Domain Mark 1.0

license_translation: CC BY-NC 4.0

license_apparatus: CC BY-NC 4.0


title: Pars 3, Cap. 5

title_alt:
De originalis peccati corruptione
On the corruption of original sin

source_text:
<!-- page 234 -->

### Capitulum V. *De originalis peccati corruptione.*

Post lapsum primi parentis dicenda sunt aliqua de *traductione* peccati originalis. Circa quod primo considerandus est modus *corruptionis*, secundo modus *traductionis*, tertio modus *curationis*[^p234-3].

Modus autem, quo genus humanum per originale peccatum *corrumpitur*, hic est. Nam quilibet per concubitum generatus nascitur natura *filius irae*[^p234-4], quia privatus rectitudine originalis iustitiae; propter cuius absentiam incurrimus quantum ad *animam* quadruplicem poenam, scilicet *infirmitatem*, *ignorantiam*, *malitiam* et *concupiscentiam*; quae quatuor inflicta sunt propter originale peccatum; quas sane poenas spirituales comitatur in *corpore* multiplex poenalitas, multiplex defectus, multiplex labor, multiplex morbus et multiplex dolor. Ad has poenas subsequitur poena *mortis* et *incinerationis*, poena *carentiae visionis Dei* et amissionis gloriae caelestis, non solum in adultis, verum etiam in parvulis non baptizatis; qui quidem parvuli « poena mitissima[^p234-5] » inter ceteros puniuntur, quia solam poenam *damni* habent sine poena *sensus*.

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum primum principium omnia agat *a se* et *secundum se* et *propter se*; necesse est, ipsum esse optimum et rectissimum, ac per hoc piissimum et iustissimum; et inde est, quod *universae viae eius misericordia et veritas*[^p234-6] sive iudicium. Si autem Deus *a principio* hominem in tantis miseriis condidisset, nec pietas esset nec iustitia, quod scilicet tanta opus suum opprimeret miseria, nulla praecedente culpa. Similiter, si tantis miseriis repleret *nos* vel repleri permitteret sine culpa, nec pie nec iuste gubernaret nos divina providentia. Si igitur certissimum est, primum principium et in *producendo* et in *providendo* rectissimum et clementissimum esse; necesse est, quod taliter genus humanum *fecerit*, ut a principio nulla esset in eo nec *culpa* nec *miseria*; necesse est etiam, quod taliter *administret*, ut non permittat in nobis esse miseriam nisi propter aliquam culpam praeambulam. Quoniam igitur certissimum est, quod a nostra origine multiplicem contrahimus miseriam *poenae*; certum est, quod omnes nascimur *natura filii irae*, ac per hoc privati rectitudine originalis iustitiae, quam privationem vocamus *culpam originalem*[^p234-7].

Et quia omnis *culpa* dicit recessum a bono incommutabili et accessum ad bonum commutabile[^p234-8]; et *recedere* a bono incommutabili est recedere a summa virtute, veritate et bonitate; *accedere* autem ad bonum commutabile est plus debito tendere in illud per amorem: hinc est, quod perdens originalem iustitiam incurrit *infirmitatem*, *ignorantiam*, *malitiam* et *concupiscentiam*.

Rursus, quia deserens bonum incommutabile propter bonum commutabile efficitur indignus utroque: hinc est, quod ratione carentiae originalis iustitiae perdit anima[^p234-9] quietem temporalem in *corpore* per multiplicem *corruptionem* et *mortem*, et tandem separatur a visione lucis aeternae, amittendo *felicitatem gloriae* tam in anima quam in corpore.

<!-- page 235 -->

Postremo, quia *carentia* huius iustitiae in nascentibus non est per motum voluntatis propriae nec per actualem delectationem; hinc est, quod originali peccato non debetur post hanc vitam poena *sensus* in gehenna, pro eo quod non supra condignum, sed citra punit divina iustitia, quam semper comitatur superabundans misericordia. — Hoc credendum est sensisse beatum Augustinum[^p235-1], licet verba eius exterius propter detestationem erroris Pelagianorum, qui aliqualem felicitatem eis concedebant, aliud sonare videantur. Ut enim eos reduceret ad medium, abundantius declinavit ad extremum.

---

english:
### Chapter V. *On the corruption of original sin.*

After the fall of the first parent, some things are to be said concerning the *transmission* of original sin. Concerning which, first the manner of its *corrupting* is to be considered, second the manner of its *transmission*, third the manner of its *cure*[^p234-3].

Now the manner in which the human race is *corrupted* through original sin is this. For everyone generated through intercourse is born by nature a *son of wrath*[^p234-4], because deprived of the rectitude of original justice; on account of the absence of which we incur, as regards the *soul*, a fourfold punishment, namely *weakness*, *ignorance*, *malice* and *concupiscence*; which four were inflicted on account of original sin; and these spiritual punishments are accompanied, in the *body*, by manifold penalty, manifold failing, manifold labor, manifold disease and manifold pain. Upon these punishments there follows the punishment of *death* and of *reduction to ashes*, the punishment of the *lack of the vision of God* and of the loss of heavenly glory, not only in adults, but also in little ones not baptized; who indeed, the little ones, are punished among the rest with « the mildest punishment[^p234-5] », because they have only the punishment of *loss* without the punishment of *sense*.

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since the first principle does all things *from itself* and *according to itself* and *for the sake of itself*, it is necessary that it be best and most upright, and thereby most loving and most just; and hence it is that *all his ways are mercy and truth*[^p234-6], that is, judgment. But if God had *from the beginning* founded man in such great miseries, there would be neither loving-kindness nor justice — namely that so great a misery should oppress his own work, with no guilt preceding. Likewise, if he filled *us* with such great miseries, or permitted us to be filled, without guilt, the divine providence would govern us neither lovingly nor justly. If, therefore, it is most certain that the first principle is, both in *producing* and in *providing*, most upright and most clement; it is necessary that it made the human race in such wise that from the beginning there should be in it neither *guilt* nor *misery*; it is necessary also that it so *administers* that it does not permit misery to be in us except on account of some antecedent guilt. Since, therefore, it is most certain that from our origin we contract manifold misery of *punishment*; it is certain that we are all born *by nature sons of wrath*, and thereby deprived of the rectitude of original justice, which privation we call *original guilt*[^p234-7].

And because every *guilt* bespeaks a withdrawing from the unchangeable good and an approaching to the changeable good[^p234-8]; and *to withdraw* from the unchangeable good is to withdraw from the highest power, truth and goodness; while *to approach* the changeable good is to tend into it by love more than is due: hence it is that he who loses original justice incurs *weakness*, *ignorance*, *malice* and *concupiscence*.

Again, because he who deserts the unchangeable good for the sake of the changeable good is made unworthy of both: hence it is that, by reason of the lack of original justice, the soul loses[^p234-9] its temporal rest in the *body* through manifold *corruption* and *death*, and at last is separated from the vision of the eternal light, losing the *happiness of glory* both in soul and in body.

<!-- page 235 -->

Last, because the *lack* of this justice in those being born is not through a motion of their own will nor through an actual delight; hence it is that to original sin there is not owed, after this life, the punishment of *sense* in gehenna, for the reason that the divine justice punishes not beyond what is deserved, but short of it, and that justice is always accompanied by a superabounding mercy. — This is to be believed to have been the mind of blessed Augustine[^p235-1], although his words outwardly, on account of his detestation of the error of the Pelagians, who conceded them some measure of happiness, seem to sound otherwise. For in order to lead them back to the middle, he inclined more abundantly to the extreme.

---

la: De his agitur hic et 2 seqq. capp.

en: These are treated here and in the 2 following chapters.

la: Eph. 2, 3: Eramus natura filii irae, sicut et ceteri. — Quomodo peccatum originale secundum Anselmum consistat in privatione originalis iustitiae, explicatur II. Sent. d. 30. a. 2. q. 1. — De quadruplici poena secundum Bedam vide ibid. d. 22. dub. 2.

en: Ephesians 2:3: "We were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest." — How original sin, according to Anselm, consists in the privation of original justice is explained in II *Sent.*, d. 30, a. 2, q. 1. — On the fourfold punishment according to Bede, see the same place, d. 22, dub. 2.

la: Ut dicit August., Enchirid. c. 93. n. 23. Cfr. II. Sent. d. 33. a. 3. q. 1. seq.

en: As Augustine says, *Enchiridion* c. 93, n. 23. Cf. II *Sent.*, d. 33, a. 3, q. 1 f.

la: Vide II. Sent. d. 30. a. 1. q. 1. seq.

la: Cfr. supra pag. 231, nota 5.

en: Cf. above, p. 231, note 5.

la: B *homo*.

en: B [reads] *homo*.

la: In libro de Fide ad Petrum (inter opera August., est Fulgentii), c. 3. n. 36. et 27. n. 70, ubi docetur, parvulos sine baptismatis Sacramento decedentes « interminabilia gehennae supplicia sustinere » et « aeterni ignis supplicio sempiterno puniendos ». Cfr. II. Sent. d. 33. a. 3. q. 1. arg. 1. et 2. ad oppos. — August., I. contra Duas Epist. Pelagian. c. 22. n. 40: Novimus, quomodo non secundum Paulum Apostolum, sed secundum Pelagium haereticum ista dicatis, parvulis videlicet baptismum necessarium non propter remissionem peccatorum, sed tantummodo propter regnum caelorum. Datis enim eis extra regnum Dei locum *salutis et vitae aeternae*, etiam si non fuerint baptizati etc. — Inferius cum edd., excepta 2, et codd., exceptis A S, retinuimus *aliqualem* pro *aliquam*. Subinde ex codd. A E S T et 2 substituimus *sonare* pro *sentire* (D H *sonare vel sentire*). Verba *Ut enim… extremum* desiderantur in multis codd.

en: In the book *On the Faith, to Peter* (among the works of Augustine, it is Fulgentius's), c. 3, n. 36, and 27, n. 70, where it is taught that little ones departing without the Sacrament of baptism "sustain the interminable torments of gehenna" and "are to be punished with the everlasting torment of eternal fire." Cf. II *Sent.*, d. 33, a. 3, q. 1, arg. 1 and 2 to the contrary. — Augustine, *Against Two Letters of the Pelagians* I, c. 22, n. 40: "We know how it is not according to Paul the Apostle, but according to Pelagius the heretic, that you say these things — namely that baptism is necessary for little ones not for the remission of sins, but only for the kingdom of heaven. For you grant them, outside the kingdom of God, a place *of salvation and of eternal life*, even if they have not been baptized," etc. — Below, together with the editions, except 2, and the codices, except A S, we have retained *aliqualem* for *aliquam*. Thereupon, from the codices A E S T and 2, we have substituted *sonare* for *sentire* (D H: *sonare vel sentire*). The words *Ut enim… extremum* are wanting in many codices. ---

translators_notes:
**Page span, established positively.** Cap. V opens **inside p. 234's left column**, immediately below Cap. IV's last line (`« …sine decore iustitiae² ».`), under the heading `Cap. V. / De originalis peccati corruptione.` — the same heading by which `bon-brev-p3-c4` fixed its own end. It fills the rest of p. 234's left column, runs the whole of p. 234's right column, and **ends near the head of p. 235's left column at `…abundantius declinavit ad extremum.`** That end is fixed **positively** by the `Cap. VI. / De originalis peccati transfusione.` heading standing immediately below it **in the same left column of p. 235** — not by any white space, and not from the index (which gives 235 for c6 but says nothing about the column). Cap. V therefore claims **no** text in p. 235's right column, and Cap. VI, like Cap. V before it, opens mid-column rather than at a column head. Running heads: p. 234 `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. V.`, p. 235 `…PARS III. C. VI.` — each naming its page's **last** capitulum, per the standing rule.

**Page break, mid-paragraph.** The p. 234/235 division falls **inside** the final paragraph, after `…non est per motum voluntatis propriae nec` (last line of p. 234's right column) and before `per actualem delectationem;` (first line of p. 235's left column) — a clean word boundary, not mid-word. Following the precedent set by `bon-brev-p3-c3`, the `<!-- page 235 -->` marker is placed at the nearest paragraph boundary above rather than splicing a comment into the middle of a sentence; the true break is recorded here.

**Gutter.** **p. 235 measured x≈1210 (57 px low-ink run, page 2571×3823)**, auto-measured by `colcrop.py vol5 235` with no constant passed, and confirmed visually — both columns crop clean, no bleed either way, and 57 px is comfortably above the ~15 px failure threshold. p. 234's x≈1341 (63 px run) was re-derived here by the same tool, unchanged from `bon-brev-p3-c4`. No parity reasoning was used and none would have helped: 1210 for an odd page is close to p. 233's 1211 but was in no way predictable from p. 234's 1341, and the running series 1194 · 1337 · 1211 · 1341 · 1210 straddles the ~1230–1370 overlap zone.

**Raw-quality verdict, split by region and by page.**
- **p. 234 — body DEGRADED in the Cap. V region, footer CLEAN.** ★ This is a **refinement of the verdict `bon-brev-p3-c4` recorded for the same page**, and it matters: c4 graded p. 234's body CLEAN, but c4 only used the top few lines of the left column. From the `Cap. V.` heading onward the same page's body is noticeably degraded — `genus iiumanum`, `origi-nale i)eccatum`, `bic est`, `natura .filius`, `pnvatus rectitudme originalis lustitiae`, `quanlum`, `infirmitatcm`, `matitiam`, `[iocnas spirituales comil^itur`, `poena morlis et tncinerationis`, `carcntiae visionis Dei el amissionis gloriae caclestis`, `[larvuli « poena milissima »`, `solam [wenam damni`, `sine poena seimis`, `cum pnmum [irmcipium omnia agat a se et secundum sc etpropter se`, `universae viac eius misericordiu ct verilas`, `in lantis miseriis`, `nec iuslitia`, `tanta o[)us suuin opprimeret miseria, imlla praecedente culpa`, `repleri [jcrmitteret`, `pri-inum princi[tium el in produccndo`, `reclissimum ct clementissimuin`, `genus bumanuin fecerit`, `nulla essct in eo nec ciilpa nec «Msena`, `quod taliter administrct, ut nou permittat`, `culpam [)racainbuiani`, `multiplieem contrabimus miseriam`, `omnes nascimur natura /ilii irae, ac [)er hoc [)rivati`, `quain privationem`, `oinnis culpa`, `recedere a i)ono iiicommutabili`, `summa virtute, veritate etbonitate; accederc autem`, `bonum coinmutabile est plus debito lendere iii illud per ainorem`, `qiiod [lerdens origina-lein iustitiam`, `deserens bonuin incoininutabile propter bonuin commulabile efTicitur`, `liinc est`, `originalis iusli-tiae perdit anima`, `quietein teinporalem`, `inultiplicem corruplioncm`, `lucis aeternac, ainittendo feiicilatem gloriae tam in anima quain in corpore`, `carcntia huius iustitiae in na-scentibus`, `per inotum voluntatis propriae`. Every reading above was settled on the band. **The lesson is that the raw's body grade moves WITHIN a single page, not merely page to page** — the standing "per-page, per-region" rule needs the region cut finer than "body vs footer". p. 234's footer, by contrast, is as clean as c4 found it: nn. 3–9 needed **no** band correction beyond the numerals themselves, which the raw never carries.
- **p. 235 — body DEGRADED, footer DEGRADED-BUT-USABLE / FLATTENED.** The thirteen body lines this chunk takes from p. 235's left column garble heavily (`per acluaiem delecUitionem`, `non dcbetur post lianc vit;iin (Ktena nemus in geiienna`, `non supra condi<,'num, scd citra punit`, `quam sein|)er comitatur superabundans niisericordia`, `sensisse beatum /Vugustmum`, `licct verba cius extc-rius`, `propter dcteslationem crroris Pelagianorum`, `aliqualem fclicitatem eis concedebant`, `aliud sonare vi-ileantur`, `Ut cnim eos reduceret ad mediiim`). p. 235's footer flattens in the usual way — `rle Fide oil Pctmm`, `Aiigust.`, `Ful-genlii`, `InleiTiiinabilia geliennae siip-plicia siistinore`, `aeterni ignis siipplicio sempilerno punien-dos`, `II. Senl,`, `l. ccjntra Duas Epist. Pelagian.`, `Pauluin Apostoluni`, `Pelagiiim liaereticum`, `pro[)ler remissionem peccatonim`, `tanlummodo propler regnuiil caelorum`, `locum salutLi ct vitac aclcrme`, `si non fiierint bapti/.ali`, `ciim cdd., excepla 2`, `exccptis A S, relinuimiis aliqualem pro aliqmm`, `sonare pro scntire` — but is legible enough to corroborate the band rather than to be trusted on its own. **None of this is a trend: p. 234's footer was the volume's first zero-correction footer and p. 235's is not, one page later.**

**Apparatus (8 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** p. 234 carries **9** footer notes and p. 235 carries **7**; this chunk owns eight of the sixteen. Every anchor was verified on the band; none was inferred from page coverage or from which footer block holds a note.
- p. 234 n. **3** on `tertio modus curationis`³ and n. **4** on `natura filius irae`⁴ — both in p. 234's **left** column, inside Cap. V.
- p. 234 n. **5** on `« poena mitissima »`⁵, n. **6** on `misericordia et veritas`⁶, n. **7** on `culpam originalem`⁷, n. **8** on `accessum ad bonum commutabile`⁸, n. **9** on `perdit anima`⁹ — all five in p. 234's **right** column, inside Cap. V. p. 234's split is therefore **2 to `p3-c4` / 7 mine**, and p. 234's register is now fully consumed.
- p. 235 n. **1** on `sensisse beatum Augustinum`¹ — in p. 235's **left** column, inside Cap. V.
- p. 235 nn. **2–7** all anchor in Cap. VI (n. 2 on `corrumpit personam`², in the left column; nn. 3–7 in the right column). **All six are forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c6`.** p. 235's split is **1 mine / 6 forwarded**.

**Footer-block layout — both pages confirm that block membership says nothing about anchor column.** p. 234's **left** block holds nn. **1–3** and its **right** block nn. **4–9**, while n. 4's anchor is in the **left** column: the left block UNDERRAN the division (c4's finding, re-verified here). p. 235's **left** block holds nn. **1–2** and its **right** block nn. **3–7**, and here the split does coincide with the column division — n. 2's anchor (`corrumpit personam`) is the last note anchored in p. 235's left column. That coincidence is exactly the trap `p3-c2` warned about and `p3-c3`/`p3-c4` sprang: it is not evidence of a rule. No printer's signature line falls on p. 234 or p. 235 (p. 233 carried the last one, `S. Bonav. — Tom. V.` with sheet number `30`; expect the next around p. 249).

**Runover findings — three tests, all NEGATIVE for this chunk; one POSITIVE event on p. 235 that belongs to `p3-c6`.**
- *Page-crossing, p. 234 → p. 235 (the open test `p3-c4` handed forward, and this chunk's to close).* p. 234's last entry, n. 9, is complete (`B homo.`), **and p. 235's left footer block opens with a numbered entry `¹`** — no unnumbered fragment stands at its head. **NEGATIVE; closed from both sides.**
- *Gutter-crossing within p. 234.* Already closed **NEGATIVE** by `p3-c4` (left block's last entry n. 3 complete, right block opens numbered `⁴`); re-verified here on both bands while reading nn. 3–9.
- *This chunk's own last entry.* p. 235 n. 1 is **not** p. 235's last entry — n. 2 follows it in the same left block, numbered — so nothing is left open on my side. **NEGATIVE.**
- *★ Gutter-crossing within p. 235 — POSITIVE, but NOT this chunk's to log.* p. 235's left block ends mid-sentence inside n. **2** (`Anselm., de Conceptu virgin. et orig. pecc. c. 23: Sic spoliavit persona naturam bono iustitiae in Adam, et natura`) and the note continues **UNNUMBERED** at the head of the **right** block (`egens facta omnes personas, quas ipsa de se procreat…`). n. 2 anchors in Cap. VI, so it is rendered by `bon-brev-p3-c6`, and **that chunk logs the event on its ledger line — this chunk must not, or the ledger double-counts** (the same discipline `p3-c4` applied to p. 233 n. 4 in the other direction). It is recorded here only so c6 does not have to rediscover it.
- Only one footnote series runs on each page: ordinals ascend in reading order across both columns, none falls out of column order, and every entry's content is reachable by an anchor in the body above it.

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands** (450 dpi bands throughout; the whole of both footers re-checked at 900 dpi, `pdftoppm -r 900` on PDF pp. 310–311, because this capitulum's apparatus is almost entirely numeric citation).
- **The serif `1` that prints like `4` accounts for every suspicious digit on p. 234's footer and is settled the same way each time — by re-reading the same glyph at 900 dpi and by the citation's own sense.** n. 4 `II. Sent. d. 30. a. 2. q. 1.` (band glyph reads `q. 4.`); n. 5 `II. Sent. d. 33. a. 3. q. 1. seq.`; n. 7 `Vide II. Sent. d. 30. a. 1. q. 1. seq.` (band `a. 4. q. 4.`); n. 8 `Cfr. supra pag. 231, nota 5.` (band `23`+serif-1); n. 6 `Psalm. 24, 10.` (band `2`+serif-4, then serif-1+`0`).
- **`Psalm. 24, 10.` is corroborated by the text it is attached to.** Vulgate Ps. 24:10 is *Universae viae Domini misericordia et veritas* — which is, word for word, the sentence the body quotes as *universae viae eius misericordia et veritas*. The reading cannot be 21 or 14.
- **`Enchirid. c. 93. n. 23` likewise.** Augustine's *Enchiridion* c. 93 is the chapter that says the punishment of those who added nothing to the sin they drew from their origin will be *mitissima omnium* — which is exactly the `« poena mitissima »` this note is annotating.
- **p. 235 n. 1 — `c. 3. n. 36. et 27. n. 70`, `d. 33. a. 3. q. 1. arg. 1. et 2.`, `c. 22. n. 40`** all read at 900 dpi; the `1`s again print as `4`s and the `q. 1. arg. 1.` pair is the clearest instance on the page, two identical glyphs one word apart.
- **p. 235 n. 1 — sigla `A S`, `A E S T`, `D H`.** The `A` in both sets prints as the crossbar-less Λ that `p3-c3` first documented on p. 233 (read as A because Λ is not in the siglum set). **`D H` is the sixth attestation of the settled `II`→`H` correspondence, and this time the flattening is in the PRINT, not only in the raw**: at 900 dpi the glyph is two bare serifed uprights with no visible crossbar, typographically indistinguishable from the Roman `II` six lines above it in the same note. It is read as **H** on the same ground `p3-c4` used for p. 233 n. 5 (`H quaedam nullius momenti addit`, whose glyph on p. 233 is identical) — there is no codex `II`, and H is a standing Breviloquium siglum (cf. p. 210 n. 2's `A B D E F H K M`). Recorded rather than flagged, but recorded explicitly because the evidence is inferential, not optical.
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Preserved as printed, not harmonised.** Cap. V's second sentence lists *modus corruptionis / traductionis / curationis* and n. 3 glosses it *De his agitur hic et 2 seqq. capp.* — i.e. the three modes map onto Capp. V, VI and VII. Quaracchi's own index, however, titles Cap. VI *De originalis peccati transfusione* (not *traductione*), while Cap. V's opening sentence and Cap. VI's opening sentence both say *traductio*. The wording divergence between heading and body stands as printed on both pages; nothing was aligned.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 234 L — "De culpa originali." · "De poena quoad animam." · "Quoad corpus." · "Poena mortis." p. 234 R — "Amissio gloriae." · "Deus fecit hominem sine culpa et miseria." · "Poena indicat culpam originalem." · "Poena quoad animam." · "Poenae aliae." · "Poena parvulorum." p. 235 L — "De opinione Augustini."

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c4`:* p. 234 footer notes **3 through 9** — seven entries, the largest hand-off in Pars III. All seven anchors were re-verified on the p. 234 bands rather than adopted from the hand-off note, and all seven placements it forwarded proved correct (nn. 3–4 anchored in the left column, nn. 5–9 in the right, with the 1–3 / 4–9 block split cutting across that). The page-crossing test c4 left open on p. 234 n. 9 is **closed, negative**. p. 234's register is now fully consumed by c4 + c5.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c6`:* p. 235 footer notes **2 through 7** (six entries), all anchored in Cap. VI (*De originalis peccati transfusione*), which opens **in p. 235's left column** immediately below Cap. V's last line and continues into p. 235's right column and beyond. **n. 2 runs over the gutter — its unnumbered continuation heads the right block — and c6 renders it joined and logs the event; this chunk deliberately did not.** Two readings on p. 235's right block need c6's own band check and are flagged here only as warnings, not resolved: n. 3 opens `Ita A B S` where the raw gives `A D S`, and continues `pro factum est A B et 2 fecit` where the raw gives `A H et 2` — the crossbar-less Λ and the B/D confusion are both live on that line, and **one note carrying two different siglum sets a clause apart is the exact hazard the standing rule warns about.** Nothing else on either page is outstanding.


title: Pars 3, Cap. 6

title_alt:
De originalis peccati transfusione
On the transmission of original sin

source_text:
<!-- page 235 -->

### Capitulum VI. *De originalis peccati transfusione.*

Modus autem *traductionis* peccati originalis hic est, quod licet *anima* non sit ex traduce, originalis tamen *culpa* ab anima Adae transit ad animas posterorum, mediante carne per concupiscentiam generata, ita quod, sicut ab anima peccante infecta fuit caro Adae et prona effecta ad libidinem, sic, per libidinem seminata et secum trahens infectionem vitiosam, inficit et vitiat animam; quae quidem infectio in anima non tantum est *poena*, verum etiam *culpa*. Et sic persona corrumpit naturam, et natura corrupta corrumpit personam[^p235-2], salva in omnibus divina iustitia, cui nullo modo potest imputari infectio animae, licet eam creando infundat et infundendo uniat cum carne infecta.

Ratio autem ad intelligentiam praedictorum haec est: quia, cum primum principium hominem fecerit ad suam imaginem propter sui ipsius expressionem; sic condidit eum ex parte *corporis*, ut omnes homines propagarentur a primo homine tanquam ab uno radicali principio; sic ex parte *animae*, ut propter expressam similitudinem, tam in essendo et durando quam intelligendo et amando, immediate emanarent omnes spiritus rationales ab ipso Deo tanquam a primo principio et immediato. Et quoniam *spiritus*, tanquam excellentior, magis accedit ad primum principium; sic condidit Deus hominem, ut spiritus corpori praeesset, et corpus subesset spiritui creato, quamdiu ille obediret[^p235-3] Spiritui increato; et econtra, si spiritus non obediret Deo, iusto Dei iudicio *corpus* suum inciperet sibi rebellare; quod et factum est, cum Adam peccavit.

Sicut igitur, si Adam stetisset, corpus suum obediens spiritui fuisset, et tale ad posteros transmitteret, et Deus illi animam infunderet, ita quod, unita corpori immortali et sibi obedienti, haberet ordinem iustitiae et immunitatem omnis poenae: sic, ex quo Adam peccavit, et caro facta est rebellis spiritui, oportet, quod talem ad posteros transmittat, et quod Deus animam infundat secundum institutionem primariam; anima vero, cum unitur carni rebelli, incurrit defectum ordinis naturalis iustitiae, quo debebat omnibus inferioribus imperare. Et quia anima carni unita est, oportet, quod ipsam trahat, vel trahatur ab ipsa; et quia ipsam non potest trahere tanquam rebellem, necesse est, ut ab ipsa trahatur et incurrat *morbum concupiscentiae*. Et sic incurrit simul *carentiam* debitae iustitiae et *morbum concupiscentiae*; ex quibus duobus tanquam ex aversione et conversione dicitur *integrari*, secundum Augustinum et Anselmum, peccatum originale[^p235-4].

Quoniam ergo ordinatissimum fuit, quod natura humana ita *conderetur*, et quod condita ita *propagaretur*, et quod peccans ita *puniretur*, sicut dictum est prius[^p235-5], ita quod in *conditione* servatur ordo sapientiae; in *propagatione*, ordo naturae; in *punitione*, ordo iustitiae: patet, quod non est contra divinam iustitiam, si ad posteros transmittitur culpa.

Rursus, quia *culpa* originalis in animam transfundi non posset, nisi *poena* rebellionis in carne praecederet; et *poena* non esset, nisi culpa praecessisset; nec *culpa* processit[^p235-6] a voluntate ordinata, sed inordinata, ac per hoc non a voluntate divina, sed humana: patet ergo, quod originalis peccati transfusio est a *peccato* primi hominis, non a Deo, non a natura condita, sed a vitio perpetrato. Et sic verum est quod dicit Augustinus[^p235-7], quod « peccatum originale non transmittit ad posteros propagatio, sed libido ».

---

english:
### Chapter VI. *On the transmission of original sin.*

Now the manner of the *transmission* of original sin is this: that although the *soul* is not from the seed, nevertheless the original *guilt* passes from the soul of Adam to the souls of his posterity, by the mediation of the flesh generated through concupiscence — in such wise that, just as the flesh of Adam was infected by the sinning soul and made prone to lust, so, being sown through lust and drawing along with itself the vicious infection, it infects and vitiates the soul; which infection indeed is in the soul not only a *punishment*, but also a *guilt*. And thus the person corrupts the nature, and the corrupted nature corrupts the person[^p235-2], the divine justice being in all things preserved intact, to which the infection of the soul can in no way be imputed, although it pours the soul in by creating it, and by pouring it in unites it with the infected flesh.

Now the reason for the understanding of the foresaid is this: since the first principle made man to its own image for the sake of the expression of itself, it so founded him on the side of the *body* that all men should be propagated from the first man as from one radical principle; and so on the side of the *soul* that, on account of the express likeness — both in being and enduring and in understanding and loving — all rational spirits should emanate immediately from God himself as from the first and immediate principle. And since the *spirit*, as the more excellent, comes nearer to the first principle, God so founded man that the spirit should preside over the body, and the body be subject to the created spirit, so long as that spirit obeyed[^p235-3] the uncreated Spirit; and conversely, that if the spirit did not obey God, by the just judgment of God his own *body* should begin to rebel against him — which also came to pass when Adam sinned.

Just as, therefore, if Adam had stood, his body would have been obedient to the spirit, and he would have transmitted it such to his posterity, and God would have poured a soul into it, so that, united to a body immortal and obedient to itself, it would have had the order of justice and immunity from every punishment: so, from the time that Adam sinned and the flesh was made rebellious to the spirit, it must be that he transmits it such to his posterity, and that God pours in the soul according to the primary institution; but the soul, when it is united to the rebellious flesh, incurs the defect of the natural order of justice, by which it ought to command all lower things. And because the soul is united to the flesh, it must be either that it draws the flesh, or that it is drawn by it; and because it cannot draw it, as being rebellious, it is necessary that it be drawn by it and incur the *disease of concupiscence*. And thus it incurs at once the *lack* of the justice owed and the *disease of concupiscence*; out of which two, as out of an aversion and a conversion, original sin is said to be *made up*, according to Augustine and Anselm[^p235-4].

Since, therefore, it was most orderly that human nature should be so *founded*, and that, once founded, it should be so *propagated*, and that, sinning, it should be so *punished*, as was said before[^p235-5] — in such wise that in its *founding* the order of wisdom is kept; in its *propagation*, the order of nature; in its *punishment*, the order of justice — it is clear that it is not against the divine justice if guilt is transmitted to posterity.

Again, because the original *guilt* could not be poured into the soul unless the *punishment* of rebellion in the flesh preceded; and there would be no *punishment* unless guilt had gone before; and the *guilt* proceeded[^p235-6] not from an ordered will, but from a disordered one, and thereby not from the divine will, but from the human: it is clear, therefore, that the transmission of original sin is from the *sin* of the first man, not from God, not from the nature as founded, but from the vice committed. And thus that is true which Augustine says[^p235-7], that « propagation does not transmit original sin to posterity, but lust does ».

---

la: Anselm., de Conceptu virgin. et orig. pecc. c. 23: Sic spoliavit persona naturam bono iustitiae in Adam, et natura egens facta omnes personas, quas ipsa de se procreat, eadem egestate peccatrices et iniustas facit. — De modo traductionis cfr. II. Sent. d. 31. per totam; quod originale peccatum non tantum sit poena, sed etiam culpa, ostenditur ibid. d. 30. a. 1. q. 2; de aequitate divini iudicii in infusione animae agitur ibid. d. 32. a. 3. — In principio, seq. cap. pro *hic est* 2 *est talis*, aliae edd. *videtur esse talis*.

en: Anselm, *On the Virginal Conception and Original Sin* c. 23: "Thus the person despoiled the nature of the good of justice in Adam, and the nature, having been made destitute, makes all the persons which it procreates of itself sinful and unjust with the same destitution." — On the manner of the transmission cf. II *Sent.*, d. 31, throughout; that original sin is not only a punishment but also a guilt is shown in the same place, d. 30, a. 1, q. 2; on the equity of the divine judgment in the infusion of the soul the same place, d. 32, a. 3, treats. — At the beginning of the following chapter, for *hic est* 2 has *est talis*, other editions *videtur esse talis*.

la: Ita A B S, alii codd. et edd. *subesset*, Q *obediret et subesset*. Inferius pro *factum est* A B et 2 *fecit*; post *stetisset* edd., excepta 2, addunt *in obedientia Dei*; pro *fuisset* edd. cum pluribus codd. *esset*, et pro *transmitteret* P *transmisisset*.

en: So A B S; the other codices and the editions have *subesset*, Q *obediret et subesset*. Below, for *factum est* A B and 2 have *fecit*; after *stetisset* the editions, except 2, add *in obedientia Dei*; for *fuisset* the editions together with several codices have *esset*, and for *transmitteret* P has *transmisisset*.

la: Vide II. Sent. d. 30. a. 2. q. 1, ubi sententia August. et Anselmi conciliatur.

en: See II *Sent.*, d. 30, a. 2, q. 1, where the opinion of Augustine and that of Anselm are reconciled.

la: Hic et cap. praeced. nec non p. II. c. 11.

en: Here and in the preceding chapter, and also in p. II, c. 11.

la: Codd. et edd. *praecessit*; sed est error.

en: The codices and the editions have *praecessit*; but it is an error.

la: Potius Fulgentius in libro de Fide ad Petrum, c. 2. n. 16 Cfr. supra pag. 170, nota 3.

en: Rather Fulgentius, in the book *On the Faith, to Peter*, c. 2, n. 16. Cf. above, p. 170, note 3. ---

translators_notes:
**Page span, established positively — this capitulum is confined to ONE printed page.** Cap. VI opens **inside p. 235's left column**, immediately below Cap. V's last line (`…abundantius declinavit ad extremum.`), under the heading `Cap. VI. / De originalis peccati transfusione.` — the same heading by which `bon-brev-p3-c5` fixed its own end. It fills the rest of p. 235's left column, runs the whole of p. 235's right column, and **ends at the foot of that right column at `…sed libido ».`** That end is fixed **positively**, and deliberately not from the white space that stands below the last line of p. 235's right column: **p. 236 was extracted and banded for this purpose, and `Cap. VII. / De originalis peccati curatione.` stands at the very HEAD of p. 236's left column.** Cap. VI therefore claims **no** text and **no** footer note on p. 236. Running heads: p. 235 `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. VI.`; p. 236 `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. VII. VIII.` — the p. 236 head names **two** capitula, which is independent confirmation that Cap. VI closes on p. 235.

**Gutter.** **p. 236 measured x≈1331 (61 px low-ink run, page 2571×3823)**, auto-measured by `colcrop.py vol5 236` with no constant passed, and confirmed visually — both columns crop clean, no bleed either way, and 61 px is comfortably above the ~15 px failure threshold. p. 235's x≈1210 (57 px run) was re-derived here by the same tool, unchanged from `bon-brev-p3-c5`. No parity reasoning was used and none would have helped: the running series is now 1194 · 1337 · 1211 · 1341 · 1210 · **1331**, which straddles the ~1230–1370 overlap zone, and 1331 was in no way predictable from 1210 one page earlier.

**Raw-quality verdict, per page AND per region AND per column-run** (following `bon-brev-p3-c5`'s correction, which this chunk confirms and extends).
- **p. 235, left column, Cap. VI region — body DEGRADED-BUT-USABLE, and NOTICEABLY LESS DAMAGED than the same page's Cap. V region.** `bon-brev-p3-c5` graded p. 235's body DEGRADED on the strength of the thirteen Cap. V lines above the `Cap. VI.` heading (`per acluaiem delecUitionem`, `non dcbetur post lianc vit;iin (Ktena nemus in geiienna`, …). From the heading down, the same column's raw is materially cleaner — `Motlus autem traduclimU`, `pcrsona`, `infeclio`, `e&lpoena`, `infundcndo "uniat`, `natio.` (for the marginal *Ratio.*), `ciim`, `magls`, `bominem` — heavy enough to require the band on every line, light enough to serve as a base. **This is the same lesson `p3-c5` drew, running the other way: the grade improves within a page as readily as it worsens. Grade the run you are actually setting from.**
- **p. 235, right column — body DEGRADED, a step worse than the left.** `S[)irilus`, `cnrpus suum inci[ieret`, `steti.ssct`, `obeuiens spiritiii fmssct`, `iinita corpori iminortali`, `iinmunitalcin`, `[icccavit`, `fact;i cst rebellis`, `qnoil talem`, `Deiis ariimam iiifiindat`, `inslitiUioncm`, `qiio debcbat omnibus inferioribus im(ierare`, `o[iortet, quotl ipsam trahat`, `[lotest Irahere`, `morlmm concupucenliae`, `care/(«m?n debitae iustitiae etmorbum`, `duobns`, `conversioRC dicitur inlegrari`, `qiiod natura humana ita condcretur`, `natiirae`, `cst contra`, `[lostcros`, `qnia culpa`, `posSet`, `reliellionis`, `foena`, `voliintate`, `inordinaLa`, `pcr lioc`, `[leccati transfusio`, `[leccatum originale`. Every reading was settled on the band.
- **p. 235 footer — FLATTENED, exactly as `p3-c5` found it.** In this chunk's six entries specifically: `Anselm.` line reads `natiiram bono iustitiae` and `pccialiues et iniuslas facit`; `d. 31. pertotam;quodoriginale` (word-joins); `acquitote divini iiidicii`, `agilur`, `0. 3.` for `a. 3.`; `liic est 2 esl talijs`; **n. 3's sigla are WRONG in the raw in two separate places** (see below); `II. Scnt. d. 30. a. 2. q. I`; `praeccd. nec non p. II. c. II.`; `Potlus Fnlgentius`, `Pelrum`.

**Apparatus (6 entries), ownership from anchors on the bands.** p. 235 carries **7** footer notes; this chunk owns **nn. 2–7**, and p. 235 n. 1 belongs to `bon-brev-p3-c5`. p. 235's register is therefore now **fully consumed** by c5 + c6. Every anchor was verified on the band; none was inferred from page coverage or from which footer block holds a note.
- n. **2** on `corrumpit personam`² — in p. 235's **left** column.
- n. **3** on `quamdiu ille obediret`³, n. **4** on `peccatum originale`⁴, n. **5** on `sicut dictum est prius`⁵, n. **6** on `nec culpa processit`⁶, n. **7** on `quod dicit Augustinus`⁷ — all five in p. 235's **right** column.
- **p. 236 contributes nothing.** Its footer register was read off the bands anyway, to close the page-crossing test and to hand a verified count forward: **p. 236 holds 7 notes**, none of them reachable by any anchor in Cap. VI. That total is now recorded in `tools/check-vol5-apparatus.py`'s `KNOWN_TOTALS`.

**Footer-block layout.** p. 235's **left** block holds nn. **1–2** and its **right** block nn. **3–7**; the split coincides with the column division here, which `p3-c5` already recorded as coincidence rather than rule (pp. 220/221/226/233 show the left block overrunning the division, p. 234 shows it underrunning). No printer's signature line falls on p. 235 or p. 236 (p. 233 carried the last one; expect the next around p. 249). Only one footnote series runs on p. 235: ordinals ascend in reading order across both columns, none falls out of column order, and every entry is reachable by an anchor in the body above it.

**Runover findings — one POSITIVE (rendered here and logged on this chunk's ledger line), two NEGATIVE, one POSITIVE forwarded.**
- *★ Gutter-crossing within p. 235, note 2 — **POSITIVE**.* p. 235's left footer block ends **mid-sentence** inside n. 2, at `Sic spoliavit persona naturam bono iustitiae in Adam, et natura`, and the note continues **UNNUMBERED** at the head of the **right** block with `egens facta omnes personas, quas ipsa de se procreat…`. The break falls at a word boundary, not mid-word. `bon-brev-p3-c5` found the event but deliberately did not log it, since n. 2 anchors in Cap. VI; **this chunk renders n. 2 joined and carries the event on its own ledger line.** Both halves were read at 450 dpi and the join re-checked at 900 dpi.
- *Page-crossing, p. 235 → p. 236 (the open test `p3-c5` handed forward, and this chunk's to close).* p. 235's last entry, n. 7, closes complete (`…Cfr. supra pag. 170, nota 3.`), **and p. 236's left footer block opens with a numbered entry `¹`** (`Edd. Postremo, diligenter attende…`) — no unnumbered fragment stands at its head. **NEGATIVE; closed from both sides.**
- *This chunk's own last entry.* p. 235 n. 7 is the page's last entry and is complete on its own page, with the following page's register opening numbered. **NEGATIVE.**
- *⚠ Gutter-crossing within p. 236 — **POSITIVE**, but NOT this chunk's to log.* p. 236's left block holds nn. **1–4** and ends mid-clause inside n. 4 at `— Superius edd., excepta 2, pro motus autem substituunt actus`, continuing **UNNUMBERED** at the head of the right block with `autem sive motus, et subinde per baptismum omittitur a pluribus codd.`. n. 4 anchors in Cap. VII, so `bon-brev-p3-c7` renders it and logs it. Recorded here only so c7 does not have to rediscover it.

**Digits and sigla settled off the bands** (450 dpi bands throughout; p. 235's whole right footer block re-read at 900 dpi, `pdftoppm -r 900` on PDF p. 311, because five of this chunk's six entries are almost purely numeric citation).
- **The serif `1` that prints like `4` accounts for every suspicious digit here.** n. 2 `ibid. d. 30. a. 1. q. 2` (band glyph reads `a. 4.`); n. 4 `II. Sent. d. 30. a. 2. q. 1` (band `q. 4`); n. 5 `p. II. c. 11.` (band `c. 44`); n. 7 `c. 2. n. 16` (band `n. 46`) and `pag. 170` (band `470`). `d. 31.`, `d. 32.`, `a. 3.` and `c. 23` carry no serif-1 and read straight.
- **★ n. 3 carries TWO different siglum sets one clause apart, and the raw gets BOTH of them wrong — the exact hazard the standing rule names, and `bon-brev-p3-c5` flagged it here without resolving it.** The band gives `Ita **A B S**` where the raw gives `A D S`, and `Inferius pro factum est **A B** et 2 fecit` where the raw gives `A H et 2`. At 900 dpi both `A`s are the crossbar-less Λ that `p3-c3` first documented on p. 233 (read A because Λ is not in the siglum set), and both second letters are unmistakably **B** — a closed upper bowl and a closed lower bowl on a single stem, nothing like the raw's `D` or its `H`. `Q`, `P` and `S` in the same note are clean. **Resolution: `A B S` and `A B et 2`, twice over, against the raw twice over.**
- **A citation's own sense checks the digits again.** n. 7's `de Fide ad Petrum, c. 2. n. 16` is corroborated by p. 235 n. 1, which cites the same work by chapter and number for the same Pelagian-adjacent argument one column to the left; and `pag. 170, nota 3` points inside this same volume, where the *propagatio / libido* tag was first annotated.
- **No `[?]` flags.**

**Preserved as printed, not harmonised.**
- **n. 7 is printed with NO stop between `n. 16` and `Cfr.`** — the line breaks after `16` and the next line opens `Cfr. supra pag. 170, nota 3.` with no period, dash or comma intervening. Checked at 900 dpi; the space after `16` is bare. Rendered exactly as printed. The English supplies the sentence break that English punctuation requires, and the divergence is recorded here rather than silently normalised. A polish pass must not insert a stop into the Latin.
- **The heading/body wording divergence carried over from Cap. V still stands.** The chapter is headed *De originalis peccati **transfusione*** while its own first sentence reads *Modus autem **traductionis** peccati originalis*, and n. 2 glosses the passage under the rubric *De modo **traductionis***. Cap. V's divisio likewise announced *modus traductionis*. Both words are on the bands, in the places printed; nothing was aligned. `bon-brev-p3-c5` recorded the same divergence from the other side.
- **`bono iustitiae`, not `bonum iustitiae`,** in the Anselm quotation of n. 2 — the ablative of separation with *spoliavit*, printed as such and left as such.

**Marginalia** (Quaracchi editorial side-glosses, trimmed from the body per corpus convention; logged here in body order). p. 235 L — "Mediante carne fit transfusio originalis." · "Notandum." · "Ratio." · "Origo corporum et animarum." p. 235 R — "Iustitia originalis." · "Transmittenda ad posteros." · "Item defectus eius transmittitur." · "Duo in peccato originali." · "Concluditur."

**Hand-offs.**
- *Picked up from `bon-brev-p3-c5`:* p. 235 footer notes **2 through 7** — six entries. All six anchors were re-verified on the p. 235 bands rather than adopted from the hand-off note, and all six placements it forwarded proved correct (n. 2 anchored in the left column, nn. 3–7 in the right). The gutter runover on n. 2 that c5 identified but deliberately left unlogged is rendered joined here and logged on this chunk's ledger line. **The two readings c5 flagged as needing an independent band check are both RESOLVED AGAINST THE RAW** — see n. 3 above. The page-crossing test c5 left open on p. 235 n. 7 is **closed, negative**. p. 235's register is now fully consumed by c5 + c6.
- *Forwarded to `bon-brev-p3-c7`:* **nothing.** Cap. VI is complete on p. 235 and inherits no page from it; p. 236's register is untouched and belongs entirely to Capp. VII and VIII. This is the second chunk in the Breviloquium to forward no note at all (cf. `bon-brev-p2-c10`, which inherited and forwarded nothing on either side).
- *Recorded for `bon-brev-p3-c7`, from bands read here but not owned here:* **⚠ `Cap. VII.` opens at the HEAD of p. 236's left column and `Cap. VIII.` (*De origine peccatorum actualium*) opens PART-WAY DOWN p. 236's RIGHT column — both capitula open on the same page**, and the running head `BREVILOQUII PARS III. C. VII. VIII.` says so. **p. 236 holds 7 footer notes**, band-derived, now in `KNOWN_TOTALS`; nn. 1–4 sit in the left block (n. 1 on `hic est`¹, n. 2 on `gratiam singularem`², n. 4 on `quantum ad actum`⁴ — n. 3's anchor was not located by this chunk and must be read), nn. 5–7 in the right block, with **n. 6 anchored on `ipse procedebat`⁶ inside Cap. VII's Anselm quotation and n. 7 on `secundum illud Iacobi primo`⁷ inside Cap. VIII** — so p. 236 will split across c7 and c8, and n. 5's anchor column must be established on the band before the split is fixed. **n. 4 runs over p. 236's gutter (positive, described above) and is c7's to render and to log.**